Question

In: Accounting

Michelle owned a building which she orally contracted to sell to Colleen, who was to remove...

Michelle owned a building which she orally contracted to sell to Colleen, who was to remove it from its concrete foundation, put it on skids, and drag it away. Before removal, Michelle repudiated the deal. Michelle defends her action by asserting the statute of frauds. (The statute of frauds provisions specify which contracts must be in writing in order to be enforceable). Was this a contract for land or for a good? Does the statute of frauds section of Article 2 apply to this contract? See UCC § 2-105 and § 2-107(1).

Solutions

Expert Solution

Statute of Frauds under UCC §2-201

Section 2-201 only applies when there’s a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more and has many exceptions, such that many contracts can be concluded without a writing. Remember that Article 2 applies to all sales transactions, not just ones with merchants. Where applicable, §2-201 requires: (i) written evidence indicating that a contract for sale has been made; and (ii) the writing must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Under §2-201, though, a writing is not insufficient even if it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon by the parties. However, such an incorrect writing is not enforceable beyond the quantity of goods shown in the writing.

There are four exceptions to the writing requirement of UCC §2-201, including: (i) a confirmation between merchants that is not objected to within 10 days of receipt; (ii) specially manufactured goods that are not suitable for sale to others in the ordinary course of the seller’s business and the seller has either made a substantial beginning of the manufacturer or commitments for the procurement of the goods; (iii) admissions in pleadings that a contract for sale has been made; and (iv) contracts with respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted.

Section 2-105

"Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (article 8) and things in action. "Goods" also includes the unborn young of animals and growing crops and other identified things attached to realty as described in the section on goods to be severed from realty (section 2-107).

Goods must be both existing and identified before any interest in them can pass. Goods which are not both existing and identified are "future" goods. A purported present sale of future goods or of any interest therein operates as a contract to sell.

Section 2-107.

(1) A contract for the sale of minerals or the like (including oil and gas) or a structure or its materials to be removed from realty is a contract for the sale of goods within this article if they are to be severed by the seller but until severance a purported present sale thereof which is not effective as a transfer of an interest in land is effective only as a contract to sell.

(2) A contract for the sale apart from the land of growing crops or other things attached to realty and capable of severance without material harm thereto but not described in subsection (1) or of timber to be cut is a contract for the sale of goods within this article whether the subject matter is to be severed by the buyer or by the seller even though it forms part of the realty at the time of contracting, and the parties can by identification effect a present sale before severance.

(3) The provisions of this section are subject to any third-party rights provided by the law relating to realty records, and the contract for sale may be executed and recorded as a document transferring an interest in land and shall then constitute notice to third parties of the buyer's rights under the contract for sale.

  • 1. Subsection (1). Notice that this subsection applies only if the minerals or structures "are to be severed by the seller". If the buyer is to sever as given in our case study such transactions are considered contracts affecting land and all problems of the statute of frauds and of the recording of land rights apply to them.

  • 2. Subsection (2). "Things attached" to the realty which can be severed without material harm are goods within this article regardless of who is to effect the severance. The word "fixtures" has been avoided because of the diverse definitions of this term, the test of "severance without material harm" being substituted.


Related Solutions

A property owner wished to sell a small apartment building that she owned. She consulted a...
A property owner wished to sell a small apartment building that she owned. She consulted a local real estate agent and listed her property. Because she was about to leave on her lengthy winter vacation, she provided the agent with authority to sell the property on her behalf if the terms of any offer received met the terms set out in the listing agreement. A prospective buyer inspected the property during the period of time that the property was listed...
Thrasher Construction Co. was contracted to construct a building for $975,000. The building is owned by...
Thrasher Construction Co. was contracted to construct a building for $975,000. The building is owned by the customer throughout the contract period. The contract provides for progress payments. Thrasher’s accounting year ends 31 December. Work began under the contract on 1 July 20X5, and was completed on 30 September 20X7. Construction activities are summarized below by year: 20X5 Construction costs incurred during the year, $180,000; estimated costs to complete, $630,000; progress billings during the year, $153,000; and collections, $140,000. 20X6...
BUSINESS LAW!!! Mary Slough contracted with Castlerock Building Inc., which was owned by Max Nitzer, to...
BUSINESS LAW!!! Mary Slough contracted with Castlerock Building Inc., which was owned by Max Nitzer, to remodel a house. Nitzer estimated the cost at $500,000. Eventually, however, Mary paid Nitzer more that $1.3 million. Mary sought to be reimbursed but Nitzer could not provide an accounting for the project. Specifically, he could not explain double and triple charges, nor whether the amount Mary pad had actually been spent on the house. Meanwhile, Nitzer had commingled personal and corporate funds. As...
Joyce has just contracted to sell a small parcel of land that she inherited a few...
Joyce has just contracted to sell a small parcel of land that she inherited a few years ago. The buyer is willing to pay R28 000 at the closing of the transaction or will pay the amounts shown in the following table at the beginning of each of the next five years. Because Joyce doesn’t really need the money today, she plans to let it accumulate in an account that earns 10% annual interest. Given her desire to buy a...
Luke sold a building and the land on which the building sits to his wholly owned...
Luke sold a building and the land on which the building sits to his wholly owned corporation, Studemont Corp. at fair market value. The fair market value of the building was determined to be $502,500; Luke built the building several years ago at a cost of $375,000. Luke had claimed $56,500 of depreciation expense on the building. The fair market value of the land was determined to be $254,000 at the time of the sale; Luke purchased the land many...
2.         Kitty, who is single, sells her principal residence, which she has owned and occupied for 8...
2.         Kitty, who is single, sells her principal residence, which she has owned and occupied for 8 years, for $375,000. The adjusted basis is $64,000 and selling expenses are $22,000. She purchases another principal residence three months later for $200,000. a.         What is Kitty’s recognized gain/loss, if any, on the sale of her old principal residence?    b.        What is Kitty’s basis in her new principal residence?
Nell, Nina, and Nora Sanders, who are sisters, sell their principal residence (owned as tenants in...
Nell, Nina, and Nora Sanders, who are sisters, sell their principal residence (owned as tenants in common) in which they have lived for the past 25 years. The youngest of the sisters is age 60. The selling price is $960,000, selling expenses and legal fees are $63,000, and the adjusted basis is $120,000 (the fair market value of the residence when inherited from their parents 25 years ago; they made no capital inprovements during the time they held the residence)....
3/       Hattie was an elderly widow who lived in Prince George. She owned a cabin...
3/       Hattie was an elderly widow who lived in Prince George. She owned a cabin on Vancouver Island. Percy, who lived in Saanich, British Columbia, was interested in purchasing the cabin and land owned by Hattie. On September 10, he wrote a letter to Hattie in which he offered to purchase the cabin and land for $125,000. Hattie received the letter on September 15, and immediately faxed a letter to Percy offering to sell the cabin and land to...
Hattie was an elderly widow who lived in Prince George. She owned a cabin on Vancouver...
Hattie was an elderly widow who lived in Prince George. She owned a cabin on Vancouver Island. Percy, who lived in Saanich, British Columbia, was interested in purchasing the cabin and land owned by Hattie. On September 10, he wrote a letter to Hattie in which he offered to purchase the cabin and land for $125,000. Hattie received the letter on September 15, and immediately faxed a letter to Percy offering to sell the cabin and land to him for...
Ava owned a building held for investment worth $800,000 in which her basis was $545,000. Ava...
Ava owned a building held for investment worth $800,000 in which her basis was $545,000. Ava owed a $320,000 mortgage on the building. She exchanged the building for a warehouse owned by Caddy Corp. which she intends to use in her business. Caddy assumed Ava’s mortgage. Caddy used the warehouse in its business and it intends to use Ava’s land in its business. Caddy’s basis in the warehouse was $482,000. Caddy owed a $365,000 mortgage on the building that Ava...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT