Question

In: Psychology

When two people are trying to make a deal -- whether they’re competing or cooperating --...

When two people are trying to make a deal -- whether they’re competing or cooperating -- what’s really going on inside their brains? Behavioral economist Colin Camerer shows research that reveals how badly we predict what others are thinking. Bonus: He presents an unexpected study that shows chimpanzees might just be better at it.?

Solutions

Expert Solution

when two people are trying to make a deal , various factors like cooperation, compitition, bargaining are influencing the mind of these people, game of hide and seek and poker.the product that you would like to sell is not much availble in market, then you do not want to sell early because of missing profit.but when everyone sell the product in market, then people also do not late to sell it for trigeering the crush.so there will be little bit compitition but not to far ahead.there are two different theories which helps to understand what people thinks or going on the brain .one is cognitive hierchy theory and equablirium analysis. in using game theory, lot of people say they do not know what by people are going to ,pick.they are not being really strategic at all.when they will pick two third of 50, that is 33.that is a start.O.in cognitive hierchy theory, it indicates a kind of heirarchy along with some assumption how many people stops at different steps and these steps of thinking are affected by lots of intersting variable and varient people.in another theory eqablirium analysis, an equablirium is mathamatical state in which every body has figured out exactly what everyone else do.it is usefull concept but behaviourlly it may not explain what people actually do in playing such type economics game.in this case equablirium make bold prediction.everyone wants to be below everyone else.therefore they will play zero.where are these things happening in the brain,one study corecelli give interesting answer, where they people had play this game, while they are scanned by FMRI and two condition some trials they are told people are playing with another person who playing right now and we are going to match up behaviour at the end. in other trail, just play the computer and choosing randomly,, so what you seen is substraction and area which more brain activity when playing people comapre to playing computer.

human being share 98.5% genes with chimpanzees.how chimpanzee and human behave differently might tell us lots of revoulation.so this is amazing ,meomory test from nagoya japan.a trained chimpanzee correctly doing sqaure solve by training. not only they do very well but also they do in sort of lazy way.chimpanzee are most faster and stronger and more statute obessed.they can preserve brain acetivities and practice them in development which really important to them to negotiate status and win. which is something like strategic thinking during compitition.chimpanzee playing actual game by touching two touch screen which is chimpanzee actuall interacting with computer.they press left and right.one chimp is called matcher.chimpanzee palying game better than human.they replicate quite nicely.people seemed to limited strategic thinking using theory of mind.people only do one or two step of strateguc thinking but chimpanzee have good strategic thinking and think diversified way.so chimpanzee is bettter compittitor than human as judged by the game theory.


Related Solutions

You are trying to decide whether to make an investment of $498.7million in a new technology...
You are trying to decide whether to make an investment of $498.7million in a new technology to produce Everlasting Gobstoppers. There is a 61% chance that the market for these candies will produce profits of $98.9 million​ annually, a(n) 22% chance the market will produce profits of$50.1 ​million, and​ a(n) 17% chance that there will be no profits. The size of the market will become clear one year from now.​ Currently, the cost of capital of the project is 11.47%per...
The Rogers Construction Company is trying to decide whether to make a bid on a project...
The Rogers Construction Company is trying to decide whether to make a bid on a project against 4 competitors. The lowest bid will win the contract and be paid the amount they bid. It believes it will cost the company £10,000 to complete the project (if it wins the contract) and £350 to prepare the bid. Based on historical data, Rogers believes each competitor’s bid has a normal distribution with mean £15,000 and standard deviation £1,500. a) Set up a...
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether...
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance-enhancing drug. If one athlete takes the drug and the other does not, the one who takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neither take the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking the drug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a loss of XX dollars. Complete the following payoff matrix describing the decisions the athletes...
The UP events office is trying to make a rough estimate of how many people will...
The UP events office is trying to make a rough estimate of how many people will attend graduation ceremonies on campus this spring. Help them out! Estimate the 95% confidence interval for the probable number of attendees / visitors at UP graduation ceremonies based on this random sample of graduation attendance figures from recent years. 9596 9831 1391 2892 6674 1938 4906 4009 6127
Assume that there are two firms competing with each other (duopoly) and make their output decisions...
Assume that there are two firms competing with each other (duopoly) and make their output decisions at the same time. a) If a collusion occurs between both firms, will it be better or not? Explain your answers. Please proof by using a mathematical equation that explain before and after a collusion. (10 points) b) What advantages the first firm as a first mover will have if this firm sets its output first than the other firm? Explain and support your...
Executives must consider the benefits and risks of competing internationally when making decisions about whether to...
Executives must consider the benefits and risks of competing internationally when making decisions about whether to expand overseas. Executives also need to determine the likelihood that their companies will succeed when they compete in international markets by examining demand conditions, factor conditions, related and supporting industries, and strategy, structure, and rivalry among its domestic competitors. For these executives that may face many uncertainties in a global marketplace, assess the three possible risks that may be faced by decision-makes seeking to...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A or replace it with new equipment that will have lower operating costs. The following information is available: The new equipment will cost $55,000. Disposal value at the end of its 5-year useful life will be $6,000. The old equipment was purchased 3 years ago for $24,000. It can be sold immediately for $5,000 but will have zero disposal value in 5 years. Maintenance work,...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A or replace it with new equipment that will have lower operating costs. The following information is available: The new equipment will cost $45,000. Disposal value at the end of its 6-year useful life will be $6,000. The old equipment was purchased 3 years ago for $20,000. It can be sold immediately for $10,000 but will have zero disposal value in 6 years. Maintenance work,...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A or replace it with new equipment that will have lower operating costs. The following information is available: The new equipment will cost $45,000. Disposal value at the end of its 6-year useful life will be $7,000. The old equipment was purchased 3 years ago for $21,000. It can be sold immediately for $5,000 but will have zero disposal value in 6 years. Maintenance work,...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A...
X Company is trying to decide whether to continue using old equipment to make Product A or replace it with new equipment that will have lower operating costs. The following information is available: The new equipment will cost $48,000. Disposal value at the end of its 6-year useful life will be $7,000. The old equipment was purchased 3 years ago for $25,000. It can be sold immediately for $5,000 but will have zero disposal value in 6 years. Maintenance work,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT