Question

In: Electrical Engineering

Find the data hazards in the following code segment lw $t1,0($t1) addi $t1,$t1,100 or $t2,$t3,$t1 add...

Find the data hazards in the following code segment

   lw $t1,0($t1) 
   addi $t1,$t1,100
   or $t2,$t3,$t1
   add $a0,$a1,$t2
   ori $a0,$a0,42
   add $t5,$a0,$t2
 

Reorder the following code segment to remove the data hazards. Assume that data forwarding takes place:

   lw  $t0,24($a0)
   sub $t4,$t4,$t0
   sub $t8,$t8,$t3
   add $t6,$t6,$t5
   mul $t7,$t7,$t1
 

What is the CPI for the reordered sequence of instructions in the preceding problem?

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

The following is the original code, (add, t1, 3, 5) (assign, a, t1) (add, t2, 3,...
The following is the original code, (add, t1, 3, 5) (assign, a, t1) (add, t2, 3, 5) (sub, t3, t2, z) (assign, b, t3) Constant folding is applied to give the following, (assign, t1, 8) (assign, a, t1) (assign, t2, 8) (sub, t3, t2, z) (assign, b, t3) After the constant folding is applied, the (assign, t2, 8) becomes redundant. What optimizations should take place in order to remove this redundancy in the constant folded code? Also show the optimized...
Consider the following history H: T2:R(Y), T1:R(X), T3:R(Y), T2:R(X), T2:W(Y), T2:Commit, T1:W(X), T1:Commit, T3:R(X), T3:Commit Assume...
Consider the following history H: T2:R(Y), T1:R(X), T3:R(Y), T2:R(X), T2:W(Y), T2:Commit, T1:W(X), T1:Commit, T3:R(X), T3:Commit Assume that each transaction is consistent. Does the final database state satisfy all integrity constraints? Explain.
Three instructors in a coordinated course, T1, T2, and T3 evaluates axam papers. T1 evaluates 20%...
Three instructors in a coordinated course, T1, T2, and T3 evaluates axam papers. T1 evaluates 20% of the exam papers, T2 pevaluates 30% and T3 evaluates 50%. The three theachers make the following proportions of errors (E) while evaluating the exam papers: 0.008, 0.008, and 0.003 respectively. If a randomly selected exam paper has an error (E), what is the probability it is from instructor T1?
Convert in machine code for MIPS LW S5, 33(S2); Add R1, T3, S5; Sub T4, S3,...
Convert in machine code for MIPS LW S5, 33(S2); Add R1, T3, S5; Sub T4, S3, R3; SW T4, 124(T7);
Consider the three transactions T1, T2, and T3, and the schedules S5 and S6 given below....
Consider the three transactions T1, T2, and T3, and the schedules S5 and S6 given below. Show all conflicts and draw the serializability (precedence) graphs for S5 and S6, and state whether each schedule is serializable or not. If a schedule is serializable, write down the equivalent serial schedule(s). T1: r1(x); r1(z); w1(x); T2: r2(z); r2(y); w2(z); w2(y); T3: r3(x); r3(y); w3(y); S5: r1(X); r2(Z); r1(Z); r3(X); r3(Y); w1(X); c1; w3(Y); c3; r2(Y); w2(Z); w2(Y); c2; S6: r1(X); r2(Z); r1(Z);...
Category T0 T1 T2 T3 Investment -$3,605,000 Net working capital change -$   236,000 $   236,000 Operating...
Category T0 T1 T2 T3 Investment -$3,605,000 Net working capital change -$   236,000 $   236,000 Operating cash flow $1,483,000 $1,483,000 $1,483,000 Salvage $   287,000 Should Brawn accept or reject this project at an adjusted WACC of 7.347.34​%, 9.349.34​%, or 11.3411.34​%?
M (g)   M (kg)   Delta t1(s)   Delta t2(s)   Delta t3(s)   Delta t(s) avg.   T (s)   T2...
M (g)   M (kg)   Delta t1(s)   Delta t2(s)   Delta t3(s)   Delta t(s) avg.   T (s)   T2 (s2)   60 0.06 6.53 6.55 6.31 6.46 0.646 0.42 80 0.08 6.63 6.60 6.64 6.62 0.662 0.44 100 0.10 6.99 6.87 7.08 6.98 0.698 0.49 120 0.12 8.12 8.36 8.46 8.31 0.831 0.69 140 0.14 8.35 8.11 8.15 8.20 0.820 0.67 find the slope (4pi^2)/k calculate the intercept ((4pi^2)/3k)m Equate the value of the slope found at point 5 with (4pi^2)/k and solve for...
Category T0 T1 T2 T3 Investment −​$9,910,109 Net working capital change -$667,000 ​$667,000 Operating cash flow...
Category T0 T1 T2 T3 Investment −​$9,910,109 Net working capital change -$667,000 ​$667,000 Operating cash flow ​$3,467,000 ​$4,050,000 ​$4,708,000 Salvage ​$359,000 a) What is the IRR of the​ project? b) At what adjusted WACCs will the company accept this​ project?
Consider the following code: lb $t0, 1($t1) sw $t0, 0($t2) Assume the followings. • The register...
Consider the following code: lb $t0, 1($t1) sw $t0, 0($t2) Assume the followings. • The register $t1 contains the content 0x1000,0000. • The word at memory address 0x1000,0000 is 0xAABB,CCDD. What value of the word is stored at the memory address pointed to by register $t2? Show the value of the word in hexadecimal.
We have three light bulbs with lifetimes T1,T2,T3 distributed according to Exponential(λ1), Exponential(λ2), Exponential(λ3). In other...
We have three light bulbs with lifetimes T1,T2,T3 distributed according to Exponential(λ1), Exponential(λ2), Exponential(λ3). In other word, for example bulb #1 will break at a random time T1, where the distribution of this time T1 is Exponential(λ1). The three bulbs break independently of each other. The three light bulbs are arranged in series, one after the other, along a circuit—this means that as soon as one or more light bulbs fail, the circuit will break. Let T be the lifetime...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT