In: Accounting
Blazer Chemical produces and sells an ice-melting granular used on roadways and sidewalks in winter. It annually produces and sells about 100 tons of its granular. In its nine-year history, the company has never reported a net loss. However, because of this year's unusually mild winter, projected demand for its product is only 65 tons. Based on its predicted production and sales of 65 tons, the company projects the following income statement (under absorption costing).
Sales (65 tons at $20,500 per ton) | $ | 1,332,500 | |||
Cost of goods sold (65 tons at $15,500 per ton) | 1,007,500 | ||||
Gross margin | 325,000 | ||||
Selling and administrative expenses | 345,800 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (20,800 | ) | ||
Its product cost information follows and consists mainly of fixed cost because of its automated production process requiring expensive equipment.
Variable direct labor and material costs per ton | $ | 4,115 | |
Fixed cost per ton ($740,000 ÷ 65 tons) | 11,385 | ||
Total product cost per ton | $ | 15,500 | |
Selling and administrative expenses consist of variable selling
and administrative expenses of $320 per ton and fixed selling and
administrative expenses of $325,000 per year. The company's
president is concerned about the adverse reaction from its
creditors and shareholders if the projected net loss is reported.
The operations manager mentions that since the company has large
storage capacity, it can report a net income by keeping its
production at the usual 100-ton level even though it expects to
sell only 65 tons. The president was puzzled by the suggestion that
the company can report income by producing more without increasing
sales.
Required:
1. Can the company report a net income by
increasing production to 100 tons and storing the excess production
in inventory? Complete the following income statement (using
absorption costing) based on production of 100 tons and sales of 65
tons. (Round your answers to the nearest whole
dollar.)
|
Production volume | ||
65 tons | 100 tons | |
production expenses : | ||
variable cost @ 4115 per ton | 267475 | 411500 |
Fixed production expenses (Given) | 740000 | 740000 |
Cost of production | 1007475 | 1151500 |
opening stock | 0 | 0 |
closing stock (1151500/100*35)(Cost of production/produced units*closing stock) | 0 | 403025 |
Cost of goods sold | 1007475 | 748475 |
No. of sold units in tons | 65 | 65 |
Cost of goods sold per unit | 15500 | 11515 |
Safety chemical | |||
Income statement - absorption method | |||
Production volume | |||
sales volume - 65 tons | 65 tons | 100 tons | |
Revenue from operation | 1332500 | 1332500 | |
less | production expenses : | ||
variable cost @ 4115 per ton | 267475 | 411500 | |
Fixed production expenses (Given) | 740000 | 740000 | |
Cost of production | 1007475 | 1151500 | |
add | opening stock | 0 | 0 |
less | closing stock (1151500/100*35) | 0 | 403025 |
Cost of goods sold | 1007475 | 748475 | |
less | selling and administrative expenses : | ||
variable part | 20800 | 20800 | |
fixed part | 325000 | 325000 | |
Total selling and administrative expense | 345800 | 345800 | |
Net income and loss (COGS - Selling & Adm. Expenses) | -20775 | 238225 |
yes, Under absorption costing, a company report a higher net income amount by producing more units than they sell.
Please check with your answer and let me know.