In: Accounting
Alvis Construction Supply Company has a department that manufactures wood trusses (wood frames used in the construction industry). The following information is for the production of these trusses for the month of February:
Work-in-process inventory, February 1 | 4,700 | trusses | |||||||||
Direct materials: 100% complete | $ | 11,180 | |||||||||
Conversion: 40% complete | $ | 15,958 | |||||||||
Units started during February | 18,700 | trusses | |||||||||
Units completed during February and transferred out | 17,700 | trusses | |||||||||
Work-in-process inventory, February 29 | |||||||||||
Direct materials: 100% complete | |||||||||||
Conversion: 20% complete | |||||||||||
Costs incurred during February | |||||||||||
Direct materials | $ | 59,740 | |||||||||
Conversion | $ | 92,792 | |||||||||
Required
Using the FIFO method, calculate the following:
1-a. Costs per equivalent unit. (Round your answers to 4 decimal places.)
1-b. Cost of goods completed and transferred out. (Do no round your intermediate calculations. Round your final answer to the nearest whole dollar.)
1-c. Costs remaining in the Work-in-Process Inventory account. (Do no round your intermediate calculations. Round your final answer to the nearest whole dollar.)
2. Assume that you are the company’s controller. The production department’s February equivalent unit cost is higher than expected. If the manager of the first department asks you to do him a favor by increasing the ending inventory completion percentage from 20 to 40% to lower the unit costs, how much would unit cost be affected by this request? (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.)
1-a. | Direct materials | Conversion | |
Work in process, february 1 (4,700 , Conversion -60% ) | - | 2,820 | |
Units Started & Completed ( 17,700 - 4,700 ) | 13,000 | 13,000 | |
Work in process, february 28 (5,700 , Material 100% ,Conversion -20% ) | 5,700 | 1,140 | |
Equivalent Units | 18,700 | 16,960 | |
Direct materials | Conversion | ||
Cost incurred during the February | 59,740 | 92,792 | |
/ Equivalent Units | 18,700 | 16,960 | |
Cost per equivalent units $ | 3.1947 | 5.4712 | |
1-b. | Amount $ | ||
Cost of work in process, february 1 ( 11,180 + 15,958 ) | 27,138 | ||
Add: Cost incurred on Work in process , february 1 in February | |||
Conversion ( 2,820 x 5.4712 ) | 15,429 | ||
Add: Cost of units started & Completed in February | |||
Direct materials ( 13,000 x 3.1947 ) | 41,531 | ||
Conversion ( 13,000 x 5.4712 ) | 71,126 | ||
Cost of goods completed & transferred out | 1,55,223 | ||
1-c.) | Amount $ | ||
Direct materials ( 5,700 x 3.1947 ) | 18,210 | ||
Conversion ( 1,140 x 5.4712 ) | 6,237 | ||
Cost of remaining work in process inventory | 24,447 | ||
2.) | Direct materials | Conversion | |
Work in process, february 1 (4,700 , Conversion -60% ) | - | 2,820 | |
Units Started & Completed ( 17,700 - 4,700 ) | 13,000 | 13,000 | |
Work in process, february 28 (5,700 , Material 100% ,Conversion -40% ) | 5,700 | 2,280 | |
Equivalent Units | 18,700 | 18,100 | |
Direct materials | Conversion | ||
Cost incurred during the February | 59,740 | 92,792 | |
/ Equivalent Units | 18,700 | 18,100 | |
Cost per equivalent units $ | 3.1947 | 5.1266 | |
Direct materials | Conversion | ||
Cost per equivalent units ( at 20% completion of ending inventory ) | 3.1947 | 5.4712 | |
Less :Cost per equivalent units ( at 40% completion of ending inventory ) | 3.1947 | 5.1266 | |
Unit cost affected by this request -Lower as compare to previous one ($) | - | 0.3446 | |