In: Accounting
ABC inc. has 3 divisions which produced the following results
last year:
Division A: Historical Cost of Investment = $750k / Operating
Income $92250
Division B: Historical Cost of Investment = $720k / Operating
Income $90k
Division C: Historical Cost of Investment = $200k / Operating
income $26k
a) caclulate each divisions ROI and RI, assume 10% cost of
capital
b) Assume that the carrying amonut of the investments is half the
historical cost, calculate each divisions ROI and RI, assuming a
10% cost of capital, using the carrying amount.
c) Which measure, ROI or RI, is a better indicator of the
performance of each division?
Please show work.
a. ROI = Operating Income / Carrying Amount * 100
RI = Operating Income - ( Carrying Amount x Cost of Capital)
Division A | Division B | Division C | |
ROI | 12.3% | 12.5% | 13 % |
RI | $ 17,250 | $ 18,000 | $ 6,000 |
b. Using the carrying amount as half of the historical cost of the operating assets:
Division A | Division B | Division C | |
ROI | 24.6 % | 25% | 26% |
RI | $ 54,750 | $ 54,000 | $ 16,000 |
c. Residual income, being expressed in absolute values is a better performance indicator, as it tells you by how much shareholder wealth increases or decreases in absolute dollar terms. ROI on the other hand is a percentage measure.
Also, if ROI is used as a performance indicator, divisional managers may not be too open to new investments, if that would result in a decrease in ROI. On the other hand, if RI is used as a performance indicator, in spite of a fresh investment, there could be increase in RI for the division. So the manager may not be averse to new investments.