In: Accounting
Tulsa Company is considering investing in new bottling equipment and has two options: Option A has a lower initial cost but would require a significant expenditure to rebuild the machine after four years; Option B has higher maintenance costs, but also has a higher salvage value at the end of its useful life. Tulsa’s cost of capital is 11 percent. The following estimates of the cash flows were developed by Tulsa’s controller:
| Option A | Option B | |||||
| Initial investment | $ | 320,000 | $ | 454,000 | ||
| Annual cash inflows | 150,000 | 160,000 | ||||
| Annual cash outflows | 70,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| Costs to rebuild | 120,000 | 0 | ||||
| Salvage value | 0 | 24,000 | ||||
| Estimated useful life | 8 | years | 8 | years | ||
Required:
Calculate NPV. (Future Value of $1, Present Value of $1, Future Value Annuity of $1, Present Value Annuity of $1.) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign. Round your "Present Values" to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
  | 
| Option A | |||||||
| Year | Cash Flows | PV Factor @ 11% | Present Value | ||||
| Initial Investment | 0 | $ (320,000) | 1 | $ (320,000) | |||
| Annual Cash Flows | 1-8 | $ 80,000 | 5.146 | $ 411,680 | |||
| Cost to Rebuild | 4 | $ (120,000) | 0.6587 | $ (79,044) | |||
| Salvage | 8 | $ - | 0.4339 | $ - | |||
| Net Present Value | $ 12,636 | ||||||
| Option B | |||||||
| Year | Cash Flows | PV Factor @ 11% | Present Value | ||||
| Initial Investment | 0 | $ (454,000) | 1 | $ (454,000) | |||
| Annual Cash Flows | 1-8 | $ 85,000 | 5.146 | $ 437,410 | |||
| Cost to Rebuild | 4 | $ - | 0.6587 | $ - | |||
| Salvage | 8 | $ 24,000 | 0.4339 | $ 10,414 | |||
| Net Present Value | $ (6,176) | ||||||
| As we see NPV of option A is higher so we can go with option A | |||||||