In: Economics
What is the most egregious example of rent-seeking (within the firm or division) you have seen in your professional experience?
The concept behind rent-seeking is ancient, though the coinage
itself is recent; some forty years ago seeking was added to convey
the effort to acquire such entitlement. What it was added to was
the concept of economic rents, the ability to charge more for a
factor of production than it would be worth under pure competition.
Rent-seeking is basically going after income derived from an unfair
advantage.
Rents, like all other forms of what we now refer to as
corruption--gatekeeping, collusion, restraint of trade, kickbacks,
graft, payola--the actual basis of feudal economics until Smith,
Say, Ricardo and other economists came along to explain that, no,
wealth comes from engaging in production and competition rather
than avoiding it.
For example, the privileged were awarded with "livings," whether it
was a parson given a parish and able to receive tithes or a duke
entitled to a share of the proceeds from working his land. When the
Puritans arrived in New England, they enforced instead the idea of
land held in common. A resident of a town could fish, fowl or
forage its fields and streams and other common areas for free but
not an outsider. If you wanted to do the same on a private holding,
the owner was at liberty to charge a fee, a rent. Suddenly, your
perch or partridge come at a cost.
Some rents--patents and copyrights, for example--are viewed as a
social good overall. Some just exist. Microsoft and Intel came to
hold de facto rents in some core products. Medieval guilds were an
extortion racket pure and simple. You wish to know a trade, spend a
lot of time and money to learn the craft, then, assuming you play
along, work comes your way. And modern unions continue the
practice. A public worker in 1960 averaged eighty percent the
earnings of an average private one, a sacrifice in return for job
security. That's when we got the first true bargaining
public-sector unions. Now, it's 144 percent not counting
million-dollar-a-decade taxpayer-guaranteed pensions while
retaining the job security. To be emphatic, that's not how much
they've gained but how much they've gained relative to private
workers--an extravagant level of rent-seeking.
Instead of creating wealth, a firm seeks to obtain financial
gains from others through alteration/ manipulation of the
environment where economic activities take place. A popular example
for rent-seeking is political lobbying by companies. These are
primarily done by companies in order to make economic gains through
government action.
This might be done by a company to get subsidy from the government
for the product which it produces or increasing tariff rates by the
government for its services, etc. Such a practice neither leads to
creation of new wealth, nor does it benefit the society.