Question

In: Psychology

In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a...

In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a handsome pay. Prior to this job, he worked successfully as an assistant programmer in Gem Computers (Gem). Arshad felt that ICL offered better career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Gem, which was a relatively small company.

Although Arshad had enjoyed working there (at Gem), he realized that to grow further in his field, he would have to join a bigger company, and preferable one that handled international projects. He was sure he would excel in his position at ICL, just as he had done in his old job at Gem.

ICL had international operations and there was more than a slim chance that he would be sent to USA or the UK on a project. Knowing that this would give him a lot of exposure, besides looking good on his resume, Arshad was quite excited about his new job.

Arshad joined Gunjan’s five-member team at ICL. He had met Gunjan during the orientation sessions, and was looking forward to working under her. His team members seemed warm and friendly, and comfortable with their work. He introduced himself to the team members and got to know more about each of them.

Wanting to know more about his boss, he casually asked Rehman, one of the team members, about Gunjan. Rehman said, “Gunjan does not interfere with our work. In fact, you could even say that she tries to ignore us as much as she can.” Arshad was surprised by the comment but decided that Gunjan was probably leaving them alone to do their work without any guidance, in order to allow them to realize their full potential.

At Gem, Arshad had worked under Sultan and had looked up to him as a guide and mentor – always guiding, but never interfering. Sultan had let Arshad make his own mistakes and learn from them. He had always encouraged individual ideas, and let the team discover the flaws, if any, through discussion and experience. He rarely held an individual member of his team responsible if the team as a whole failed to deliver – for him the responsibility for any failure was collective. Arshad remembered telling his colleagues at Gem that the ideal boss would be someone who did not interfere with his/her subordinate’s work. Arshad wanted to believe that Gunjan too was the non-interfering type. If that was the case, surely her non-interference would only help him to grow.

In his first week at work, Arshad found the atmosphere at the office a bit dull. However, he was quite excited. His team had been assigned a new project and was facing a few glitches with the new software. He had thought about the problem till late in the night and had come up with several possible solutions. He could not wait to discuss them with his team and Gunjan. He smiled to himself when he thought of how Gunjan would react when he will tell her that he had come up with several possible solutions to the problem. He was sure she would be happy with his having put in so much effort into the project, right from day one.

He was daydreaming about all the praise that he was going to get when Gunjan walked into the office. Arshad waited for her to go into her cabin, and after five minutes, called her up, asking to see her. She asked him to come in after tem minutes. When he went in, she looked at him blankly and asked, “Yes?” Not sure whether she had recognized him, Arshad introduced himself. She said, “Ok, but why did you want to meet me?” Arshad started to tell her about the problems they were having with the software. But before he could even finish, she told him that she was busy with other things, and that she would send an email with the solution to all the members of the team by the end of the day, and that they could then implement it immediately. Arshad was somewhat taken aback. However, ever the optimist, he thought that she had perhaps already discussed the matter with the team.

Arshad came out of Gunjan’s cabin and went straight to where his team members sat. He thought it would still be nice to bounce ideas off them and also to see what solutions others might come up with. He told them of all the solutions he had in mind. He waited for the others to come up with their suggestions but not one of them spoke up. He was surprised, and asked them point-blank why they were so disinterested.

Aftab, one of the team members, said, “What is the point in our discussing these things? Gunjan is not going to have time to listen to us on discuss anything. She will just give us the solution she thinks is best, and we will just do what she tells us to do; why waste everyone’s time?”

Arshad felt his heart sink. Was this the way things worked over here? However, he refused to lose heart and thought that maybe, he could change things a little. But as the days went by, Arshad realized that Gunjan was the complete opposite of his old boss.

While she was efficient at what she did and extremely intelligent, she had neither the time nor the inclination to groom her subordinates. Her solutions to problem were always correct, but she was not willing to discuss or debate the merits of any other ideas that her team might have. She did not hold the team down to their deadlines not did she ever interfere. In fact, she rarely said anything at all. If work did not get finished on time, she would just blame her team, and totally disassociate herself from them.

Time and again, Arshad found himself thinking of Sultan his old boss, and of how he had been such a positive influence. Gunjan, on the other hand, even without actively doing anything, had managed to significantly lower his motivation levels.

Arshad gradually began to lose interest in his work – it had become too mechanical for his taste. He didn’t really need to think; his boss had all the answers. He was learning nothing new, and he felt his career was going nowhere. As he became more and more discouraged, his performance suffered. From being someone with immense promise and potential Arshad was now in danger of becoming just another mediocre techie.

Questions:

Q1. What, according to you, were the reasons for Arshad’s disillusionment? Answer the question using Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.

Solutions

Expert Solution

  • Since the boss did not pay attention to the employees needs and did not interact with them that lead to low motivation in Arshad.She was not an approachable boss and neither democratic in nature who valued her employees and their opinions. This has lead to experiencing a lack of belongingness need in Arshad as the boss is not making him feel a part of the group and neither does she appreciate anything or any work but only blames her employees.
  • This has also lowered his self esteem needs and made him feel not good about himself as he is not being recognized for his achievements which is obviously hindering his growth in his work and experiencing no sense of personal fulfillment at work.(self actualization)
  • As a boss she needs to be a leader who needs to realise that employees work to meet people and have a personal challenge and sense of achievement ( relatedness needs). Others work to gain experience to get promotion (growth needs). Showing respect,giving recognition,communication,involving people in decision making,encouraging ideas,praising employees for their good work,getting to know your employees,team building and celebrating success is important to keep the employees motivated.

Related Solutions

In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a...
In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a handsome pay. Prior to this job, he worked successfully as an assistant programmer in Gem Computers (Gem). Arshad felt that ICL offered better career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Gem, which was a relatively small company. Although Arshad had enjoyed working there (at Gem), he realized that to grow further in his field, he would have to join a bigger company,...
Case Study In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer,...
Case Study In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a handsome pay. Prior to this job, he worked successfully as an assistant programmer in Gem Computers (Gem). Arshad felt that ICL offered better career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Gem, which was a relatively small company. Although Arshad had enjoyed working there (at Gem), he realized that to grow further in his field, he would have to join a...
Case Study In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer,...
Case Study In December 2016, Arshad Ali joined Imperial Computers Ltd. (ICL) as a Senior Programmer, with a handsome pay. Prior to this job, he worked successfully as an assistant programmer in Gem Computers (Gem). Arshad felt that ICL offered better career prospects, as it was growing much faster than Gem, which was a relatively small company. Although Arshad had enjoyed working there (at Gem), he realized that to grow further in his field, he would have to join a...
Stepfall Ltd had the following ratios at 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016: 2017 2016...
Stepfall Ltd had the following ratios at 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016: 2017 2016 Gross profit margin 27% 31% Return on capital employed 15% 22% Current ratio 1.1:1 0.7:1 Acid test ratio 0.8:1 0.6:1 Trade receivable days 33 days 48 days Inventory holding days 42 days 57 days Which ONE of the following statements is TRUE? a) The company’s profitability, working capital management and liquidity have improved. b) The company’s profitability and working capital management have deteriorated but...
on december 31 2016, p226 ltd purchased bonds of cz775 ltd. the bonds mature at a...
on december 31 2016, p226 ltd purchased bonds of cz775 ltd. the bonds mature at a value of 5,000,000. The stated interest is 3%. Interest paid each june 30 and December 31. The bonds were purchased to yield 3.4%. The bond will be accounted foras FVTPL and p226 follows IFRS 9. a) What is the price of the Bond b) Provide the 2017 Journal entries for June 30 and Dec 31 for P226. Use the net method and the standard...
Melbourne Ltd acquired 100% of Sydney Ltd on 11 December 2016. On 1 January 2017, Sydney...
Melbourne Ltd acquired 100% of Sydney Ltd on 11 December 2016. On 1 January 2017, Sydney Ltd sold a machine to Melbourne Ltd for $80,000 and recorded a profit of $20,000. Melbourne Ltd will depreciate this machine on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 8 years. You, the group accountant, have just finished preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2020. Mrs Jones, CEO of Melbourne Ltd, is not an accountant and she doesn’t...
The statement of financial position of Dai Sing Ltd as at 31 December 2016 showed a...
The statement of financial position of Dai Sing Ltd as at 31 December 2016 showed a balance in Accounts Receivable of $1,753,800, and a credit balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of $210,456. During the financial year ended 31 December 2017, the following transactions occurred: sales on account $5,566,300; sales returns $340,000; collections from customers $5,072,800; accounts written off $209,000; discount allowed $8,800; and collection of previously written off accounts of $57,000. Required a      ‘The direct write-off method of accounting...
A partial statement of financial position of Carla Vista Ltd. on December 31, 2016, showed the...
A partial statement of financial position of Carla Vista Ltd. on December 31, 2016, showed the following property, plant, and equipment assets accounted for under the cost model (accumulated depreciation includes depreciation for 2016): Buildings $300,000 Less: accumulated depreciation 100,000 $200,000 Equipment $131,000 Less: accumulated depreciation 51,000 80,000 Carla Vista uses straight-line depreciation for its building (remaining useful life of 20 years, no residual value) and for its equipment (remaining useful life of 8 years, no residual value). Carla Vista...
Shamsud Ltd. operates on a calendar-year basis. At the beginning of December 2016, the company had...
Shamsud Ltd. operates on a calendar-year basis. At the beginning of December 2016, the company had the following current liabilities on its books: Accounts payable $85,000 Rent payable 10,000 Warranty provision 12,000 Unearned revenue 14,000 In December, the following events occurred: 1.Shamsud purchased a new computer system on account at a cost of $28,000, payable on January 15, 2017. In addition to this, $4,000 was paid in cash to have the new system installed and customized to the company's requirements....
At 31 December 2016, the trial balance of ABC Ltd containedthe following amounts before adjustment:...
At 31 December 2016, the trial balance of ABC Ltd contained the following amounts before adjustment:                                                                        Debits                          Credits                        Accounts Receivable                  $400 000                        Allowance for Doubtful Debts                                        $5 200                        Sales                                                                            $950 000Required:(1) Based on the information given which method of accounting for bad debts is ABC Ltd using—the direct write-off method or the allowance method, and why?(2) Prepare the adjusting entry at 31 December 2016 for bad debts expense assuming that the ageing schedule indicates that $10 500 of accounts receivable...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT