In: Statistics and Probability
A consumer agency is investigating the blowout pressures of Soap Stone tires. A Soap Stone tire is said to blow out when it separates from the wheel rim due to impact forces usually caused by hitting a rock or a pothole in the road. A random sample of 28 Soap Stone tires were inflated to the recommended pressure, and then forces measured in foot-pounds were applied to each tire (1 foot-pound is the force of 1 pound dropped from a height of 1 foot). The customer complaint is that some Soap Stone tires blow out under small-impact forces, while other tires seem to be well made and don't have this fault. For the 28 test tires, the sample standard deviation of blowout forces was 1356 foot-pounds.
(a) Soap Stone claims its tires will blow out at an average
pressure of 20,000 foot-pounds, with a standard deviation of 1026
foot-pounds. The average blowout force is not in question, but the
variability of blowout forces is in question. Using a 0.1 level of
significance, test the claim that the variance of blowout pressures
is more than Soap Stone claims it is.
Classify the problem as being a Chi-square test of independence or
homogeneity, Chi-square goodness-of-fit, Chi-square for testing or
estimating σ2 or σ, F test
for two variances, One-way ANOVA, or Two-way ANOVA, then perform
the following.
One-way ANOVAF test for two variances Chi-square test of independenceChi-square for testing or estimating σ2 or σChi-square test of homogeneityChi-square goodness-of-fitTwo-way ANOVA
(i) Give the value of the level of significance.
State the null and alternate hypotheses.
Ho: σ2 = 1052676; H1: σ2 > 1052676Ho: σ2 = 1052676; H1: σ2 ≠ 1052676 Ho: σ2 < 1052676; H1: σ2 = 1052676Ho: σ2 = 1052676; H1: σ2 < 1052676
(ii) Find the sample test statistic. (Use two decimal
places.)
(iii) Find the P-value of the sample test statistic. (Use
four decimal places.)
(iv) Conclude the test.
Since the P-value is greater than or equal to the level of significance α = 0.10, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value is less than the level of significance α = 0.10, we reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value is less than the level of significance α = 0.10, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value is greater than or equal to the level of significance α = 0.10, we reject the null hypothesis.
(v) Interpret the conclusion in the context of the application.
At the 10% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance is not greater than claimed.At the 10% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance is greater than claimed. At the 10% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance is not greater than claimed.At the 10% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance is greater than claimed.
(b) Find a 90% confidence interval for the variance of blowout
pressures, using the information from the random sample. (Use one
decimal place.)
< σ2 < square foot-pounds
Sample Standard deviation, s = 1356
Sample size, n = 28
Test used: Chi-square for testing or estimating σ2 or σ
a) i) Level of significance, α = 0.1
Null and alternative hypothesis:
Hₒ : σ² = 1052676
H₁ : σ² > 1052676
ii) Test statistic:
χ² = (n-1)s² / σ² = (28-1)*1356² / 1026² = 47.1616
Degree of freedom:
Df = n -1 = 27
iii) p-value = CHISQ.DIST.RT(47.1616, 27) =
0.0095
iv) Conclusion:
Since the P-value is less than the level of significance α = 0.10, we reject the null hypothesis.
v) Interpret:
At the 10% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance is greater than claimed.
b) 90% confidence interval:
χ²1-α/2 = 16.1514, χ²α/2 = 40.1133