Question

In sociology we say that culture is very important for human societies since culture gives us a framework to make sense of our lives and social interactions in society. How culture has developed since prehistorical times, how do you think it has contributed to human social development and human evolution? Today human cultures are diverse and different across the planet. Why in sociology we encourage cultural relativism and we challenge ethnocentrism?

Can you please give me 300 words for these questions?

Answer 1

Below is an absolutely accurate answer.

Part 1)

Culture has developed since prehistorically in following ways-

Cultural limits as changes: Culture, social transmission, and social advancement emerge from hereditarily developed mental changes for procuring thoughts, convictions, values, rehearses, mental models, and strategies from others via belief and deduction. Subsequently, the initial section in speculating is to make use of the motive of normal determination to create theories approximately the development and pastime of our social learning limits.

-Cultural development: These psychological adjustments provide ascent to a hearty second association of legacy (social improvement) that works by means of diverse transmission policies than hereditary legacy, and would as a consequence be able to deliver marvels now not noticed in specific less social species. Guessing about these processes requires taking what we consider human social learning and insight, installing them into transformative models that contain social cooperation, and inspecting their developing houses with the objective of making observational forecasts.

Culture-first-rate coevolution: The 2d association of legacy made via social improvement can alter each the social and physical conditions looked by advancing qualities, prompting a technique termed culture-high-quality coevolution. For instance, seemingly the act of cooking spread via social mastering in familial human populaces.

Section 2)

Sociology encourage cultural relativism and challenges ethnocentrism because in-

Ethnocentrism frequently includes the conviction that one's personal race or ethnic gathering is the most giant or that a few or all elements of its manner of life are higher than those of various gatherings.

Inside this notion system, human beings will skip judgment on specific gatherings in line with their own unique ethnic collecting or culture, particularly with worry to language, conduct, customs, and religion.

Where as

-Cultural relativism is the conviction that the thoughts and estimations of a culture can't be completely transformed into, or completely comprehended in, unique dialects; that a specific social antique (e.G., a custom) need to be comprehended as some distance as the bigger representative association of which it's miles a section.

-Cultural relativism is the guideline that a wonderful individual's convictions and exercises have to be comprehended by using others as far as that person's very own manner of lifestyles.