Question

In: Accounting

managerial accounting question Sweet Harmony Ltd is a sole distributor of a reputable brand of headphones...

managerial accounting question

Sweet Harmony Ltd is a sole distributor of a reputable brand of headphones in this region. It imports completely knocked down kits (CKD) from an international headphone manufacturer and then assembles and packs these into finished products (earphones) before transferring them to the finished goods store for distributions in the region.

The CKD are issued and utilised at the beginning of the assembly process. The other assembly costs are incurred evenly throughout that process. When the assembly process is complete, the packing process is undertaken.

Overhead is applied into the assembly and the packing, at a rate of 100% and 20% of direct labour cost respectively.
It is considered normal for some earphones to be spoiled during assembly and packing. Quality control inspection is applied at the end of the packing process to determine whether units are spoiled.

It is accepted that spoilage is normal if spoiled units are no more than 5% of the completed good units produced.
Despite vigilant security measures, it is common that some units are lost, probably by pilferage. The cost of lost units is written off as a loss of the period in which it occurs. This cost is measured at the cost of the CKD kits plus the assembly process, but no packing cost is charged.


Sweet Harmony Ltd uses FIFO system of costing.
The following data summarize the firm’s activities during May.

Opening WIP
CKD kits $120,000
Direct labour cost (assembly) to 30 Apr $50,000
No. of units (60% assembled) 100,000 units


Cost incurred during May
CKD kits $240,000
Direct labour cost (assembly) $80,000
Direct labour cost (packing) $60,000


Production data for May
CKD kits received into assembly 224,000 units
Good earphones completed from packing 180,000 units
Spoiled units 20,000 units
Lost units 4,000 units

None of the opening work in process had at that stage entered the packing process. Similarly, there is no closing work in process at the end of the month in the packing process. However, the units in the closing work in process were on average, 25% complete as to assembly.

Required:
(a) Using the four-step approach:
(i) Calculate the number of units in the closing work in process for assembly and packing.


(ii) Calculate the number of equivalent units processed in May, distinguishing between assembly process and packing process.


(ii) Calculate the costs per equivalent units for each product cost category processed in May for the assembly process and the packing process, the costs of units transferred from the assembly process to the packing process, the cost of completed units from the packing process, the costs of abnormal spoilage, lost units and closing WIP.

Solutions

Expert Solution

(i)Unitflowcomputation.

Assembly ($)

Packing

Opening inventory in process

100,000

0

Goods started in May

224,000

204,000

Goods completed and Transfer out

204,000

180,000

Normal spoilage

0

11,000

Abnormal Spoilage

0

9,000

Loss unit

0

4,000

Closing inventory in work in progress

120,.000

Note.

Good completed and transferred out of one process will be transferred in of the next process

(ii) Equaling unit computation.

Computation of equaling units in may assembly Department.

Equivalent units for Direct Material

Equivalent units for Direct Material = Started completed during the year + Ending Working progress spoiled +Loss.

Started and completed in this year = Total completed units – Beginning work in progress.

                                        =204,000-100,000 =104,000

Equivalent units of direct Material = 104,000+120,000=224000

Equivalent units for Conversion Cost (Assembly)

Equaling units for Conversion Cost= portion of binging work in progress to completed this year +Started and completed this year + portion of ending work in progress completed this year.
       Equaling units for Conversion Cost=(100,000*40%) + 104,000+(120,000*25%)

      Equaling units for Conversion Cost= 40,000+104,000+30,000 = 174,000

Equivalent unit in packing process.

AS there is no work in progress with packing process the equaling units will be

Good units completed + spoiled unit + Loss for both Direct Material And Conversion.

180,000+20000+4000 = 204000

(iii)Equaling unit Cost computation.

Assembly unit.

Direct Material

Total cost incurrent in current period/Equaling units of Direct Material

Cost incurred = $240,000/224,000 =$1.07

Cost of conversion

Direct Labor = 80,000

Overhead Cost =80,000 (100% of Direct labor)

Total Conversion Cost = 80000+80000 =160,000

Number of Equaling units = $160,000/174000 = .91

Total Cost of goods transferred to Packing process

Direct Material = $1.07* 80000= 85,600

Conversion Cost = .91*(80000+40000) =$109,200

Total Cost Current year Transferred to Processing Department = $194,800 (Conversion cost + Material)

Cost transferred on beginning work in progress to packing Department = $120,000+$50,000 = $170,000

Total transfer out cost to packing department =   Current year cost + Binging inventory cost =$ 364,800

Per unit computation in Packing process

Total Conversion Cost

Direct labor =$60,000

Overhead = $12,000 (20% of direct labor)

Total Conversion Cost = $180,000

Cost per equaling unit =$180,000/204,000 =.88

Transfer in cost ($)

Process cost ($)

Total ($)

Cost allocated to good unit

322,200

158,400

480,600

Abnormal loss

19,690

9,680

29,370

Normal loss

16,110

7,920

24,030

Loss of unit

7,160

3,520

10,680

Final Cost

Cost of finished goods = Cost allocated to good unit+ Normal loss = $480,600+$24,030= $504,630

Abnormal loss = $29,370

Loss of unit = $10,680

Note.

All values are rounded to nearest integrals


Related Solutions

Sweet Harmony Ltd is a sole distributor of a reputable brand of headphones in this region....
Sweet Harmony Ltd is a sole distributor of a reputable brand of headphones in this region. It imports completely knocked down kits (CKD) from an international headphone manufacturer and then assembles and packs these into finished products (earphones) before transferring them to the finished goods store for distributions in the region. The CKD are issued and utilised at the beginning of the assembly process. The other assembly costs are incurred evenly throughout that process. When the assembly process is complete,...
managerial accounting question
A company produces and sells a product with the following information: Selling price per unit: $100 Variable cost per unit: $50 Fixed costs per month: $30,000 Expected sales volume per month: 1,000 units The company is considering a proposal to increase the selling price to $110 per unit, which is expected to reduce sales volume to 900 units per month. Alternatively, the company could reduce variable costs per unit to $45 by improving efficiency, which is expected to increase sales...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 9,000 9,500 10,000 Sales $ 945,000 $ 997,500 $ 1,050,000 Cost of goods sold 567,000 598,500 630,000 Gross margin 378,000 399,000 420,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 4,000 4,500 5,000 Sales $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 240,000 270,000 300,000 Gross margin 160,000 180,000 200,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 6,750 7,250 7,750 Sales $ 742,500 $ 797,500 $ 852,500 Cost of goods sold 445,500 478,500 511,500 Gross margin 297,000 319,000 341,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 4,000 4,500 5,000 Sales $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 240,000 270,000 300,000 Gross margin 160,000 180,000 200,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 9,000 9,500 10,000 Sales $ 945,000 $ 997,500 $ 1,050,000 Cost of goods sold 567,000 598,500 630,000 Gross margin 378,000 399,000 420,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 4,000 4,500 5,000 Sales $ 400,000 $ 450,000 $ 500,000 Cost of goods sold 240,000 270,000 300,000 Gross margin 160,000 180,000 200,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 7,500 8,000 8,500 Sales $ 712,500 $ 760,000 $ 807,500 Cost of goods sold 427,500 456,000 484,500 Gross margin 285,000 304,000 323,000 Selling and...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of...
Morrisey & Brown, Ltd., of Sydney is a merchandising company that is the sole distributor of a product that is increasing in popularity among Australian consumers. The company’s income statements for the three most recent months follow: Morrisey & Brown, Ltd. Income Statements For the Three Months Ended September 30 July August September Sales in units 4,000 4,500 5,000 Sales $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 Cost of goods sold 240,000 270,000 300,000 Gross margin 160,000 180,000 200,000 Selling and administrative expenses: Advertising...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT