Question

Builder Products, Inc. manufactures a caulking compound that goes through three processing stages prior to completion. Information on work in the first department, cooking, is given below for May:

Production data:
Units in process, May 1: 100% complete as to materials and 80% complete as to labour and overhead		15,400
Units started into production during May		114,000
Units completed and transferred out		104,000
Units in process, May 31: 60% complete as to materials and 20% complete as to labour and overhead		?
Cost data:
Work-in-process inventory, May 1:
Materials cost	$	2,200
Labour cost		2,720
Overhead cost		6,400
Cost added during May:
Materials cost		168,000
Labour cost		27,200
Overhead cost		74,800

Materials are added at several stages during the cooking process, whereas labour and overhead costs are incurred uniformly. The company uses the weighted average cost method. The company combines labour and overhead into a single cost category—conversion cost.

Required:
Prepare a production report for the cooking department for May. Use the following three steps in preparing your report:

1. Prepare a quantity schedule and a computation of equivalent units.

2. Compute the costs per equivalent unit for the month. (Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)

3. Using the data from parts (1) and (2), prepare a cost reconciliation. (Round "Cost per equivalent unit" to 3 decimal places and the rest to the nearest dollar amount.)

Note: There is difference of "$122" in both the values due to rounding and we feel a note which reads: "Due to rounding, your "Cost accounted for" may not be equal to "Cost to account for"".

4. Prepare a production report for the cooking department for May. Assuming the company uses the FIFO method. Follow parts (1) to (3). (Leave no cells blank, enter "0" wherever required. Round "Cost per equivalent unit" to 3 decimal places and the rest to the nearest dollar amount.)

  
Quantity Schedule and Equivalent Units

Cost per Equivalent Unit

Cost Reconciliation

Note: There is difference of "$122" in both the values due to rounding and we feel a note which reads: "Due to rounding, your "Cost accounted for" may not be equal to "Cost to account for"".

Answer 1