In: Economics
Solve the game below, assuming that both players A & B play simultaneously. What is the dominant strategy for A and for B. (payoffs shown are A, B).
B
B1 B2
A A1 3, 3 7, 2
A2 1, 7 6, 6
If the players could collude, would this alter the outcome? How so?
Payoff matrix:
B | |||
B1 | B2 | ||
A | A1 | (3, 3) | (7, 2) |
A2 | (1, 7) | (6, 6) |
(a) Dominant strategy is the strategy chosen by one player irrespective of strategy chosen by the other player.
Player A will choose A1 for whichever strategy Player B chooses, since payoff are higher (3 > 1, 7 > 6). So Player 1's dominant strategy is A1.
Player B will choose B1 for whichever strategy Player A chooses, since payoff are higher (3 > 2, 7 > 6). So Player 2's dominant strategy is B1.
(b) Nash equilibrium is obtained as follows.
When Player A chooses A1, Player B's best strategy is B1 since payoff is higher (3 > 2).
When Player A chooses A2, Player B's best strategy is B1 since payoff is higher (7 > 6).
When Player B chooses B1, Player A's best strategy is A1 since payoff is higher (3 > 1).
When Player B chooses B2, Player A's best strategy is A1 since payoff is higher (7 > 6).
Therefore, Nash equilibrium is: (A1, B1) [see below].
(c) If players collude, they will seek to maximize individual payoff and joint payoff, so Player A will choose A2 and Player B will choose B2 [(6 + 6) = 12 > (3 + 3) = 6, and 6 > 3, 6 > 3].