Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are given below. Let μA, μB, and μC represent the mean daily sales using bottle designs A, B, and C, respectively.

a. State the null and alternative hypotheses

  1. What is the test statistic?
  2. Using a .05 significance level, what is the decision rule?
  3. Show the test statistic and essential calculations.
  4. Interpret you results
  5. Should you conduct a Post Hoc Tukey on this data? Why.
  6. Based on your answer for part f conduct a Post Hoc Tukey

Bottle Design Study Data

A

B

C

16

33

23

18

31

27

19

37

21

17

29

28

13

34

25

Solutions

Expert Solution

A B C Total
Sum 83 164 124 371
Count 5 5 5 15
Mean, Sum/n 16.6 32.8 24.8
Sum of square, Ʃ(xᵢ-x̅)² 21.2 36.8 32.8

Number of treatment, k = 3

Total sample Size, N = 15

df(between) = k-1 = 2

df(within) = N-k = 12

df(total) = N-1 = 14

SS(between) = (Sum1)²/n1 + (Sum2)²/n2 + (Sum3)²/n3 - (Grand Sum)²/ N = 656.1333

SS(within) = SS1 + SS2 + SS3 = 90.8

SS(total) = SS(between) + SS(within) = 746.9333

MS(between) = SS(between)/df(between) = 328.0667

MS(within) = SS(within)/df(within) = 7.566667

F = MS(between)/MS(within) = 43.3568

p-value = F.DIST.RT(43.3568, 2, 12) = 0.0000

a)

Null and Alternative Hypothesis:

Ho: µ1 = µ2 = µ3

H1: Not all means are equal.

b)

We will use One way ANOVA test

Test statistic:

F = 43.36

c)

Critical value Fc = F.INV.RT(0.05, 2, 12) = 3.885

Rejection region: Reject Ho if F > 3.885

d) Essential calculation are shown above.

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Between Groups 656.1333 2 328.0667 43.3568 0.0000
Within Groups 90.8000 12 7.5667
Total 746.9333 14

e)

As F > Fc, we reject the null hypothesis.

There is enough evidence to conclude that the not all means are equal.

f)

Yes, a post-Hoc tukey test should be performed as the null hypothesis is rejected.

g)

At α = 0.05, k = 3, N-K = 12, Q value = 3.78

Critical Range, CV = Q*√(MSW/n) = 3.78*√(7.5667/5) = 4.65

Comparison Diff. = (xi - xj) Critical Range Results
x̅1-x̅2 -16.2 4.65 Means are different
x̅1-x̅3 -8.2 4.65 Means are different
x̅2-x̅3 8 4.65 Means are different

Related Solutions

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 17...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 17...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 18...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 19...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 13...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 15...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT