Question

In: Economics

(2) Assume there are 2 firms a monopolist (incumbent) (Firm A) and an entrant (Firm B)....

(2) Assume there are 2 firms a monopolist (incumbent) (Firm A) and an entrant (Firm B). Firm b could enter the market or not and firm A could fight or accommodate. The total Profit in this market is a $100. If firm B enters and A decides to accommodate they will share equally ($50 and $50). Assume that Firm A incurs in a cost (advertising for example) if it decides to fight firm B of $30. Assume that this cost is incurred at the beginning of the game regardless if Firm B enters or not. This game is played only once and both players move at the same time a. Write the game in Normal form b. Obtain the Nash equilibrium. (2) Assume there are 2 firms a monopolist (incumbent) (Firm A) and an entrant (Firm B). Firm b could enter the market or not and firm A could fight or accommodate. The total Profit in this market is a $100. If firm B enters and A decides to accommodate they will share equally ($50 and $50). Assume that Firm A incurs in a cost (advertising for example) if it decides to fight firm B of $30. Assume that this cost is incurred at the beginning of the game regardless if Firm B enters or not. This game is played only once and both players move at the same time a. Write the game in Normal form b. Obtain the Nash equilibrium.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A).

Consider the given problem here there are two firms “firm A” is the “Incumbent” and “firm B” is the “Entrant”. So, here both the firms have two strategies. SO, the normal form game is given below.

So, here if “Incumbent” choose to “Accommodate” then will get “$100” if “Entrant” decide to “not to enter” in the market and will get “$50” if “Entrant” decide to “enter” in the market. Similarly, if “Incumbent” choose to “Fight” then will get “$100-$30=$70” in either case.

B).

Now, if “Entrant” decides to “enter” into the market then the optimum choice for “Incumbent” is to “Fight”, because under “Fight” “incumbent” will get more profit. Similarly, if “Incumbent” decides to “Fight”, => the “Entrant” is indifferent between “E” and “NE”, => here is one “Nash Equilibrium” which is given by “Fight, Enter” with pay off “$70, $0”.

Now, if “Entrant” decides to “not to enter” into the market then the optimum choice for “Incumbent” is to “Accommodate”, because under “Accommodate” “incumbent” will get more profit. Similarly, if “Incumbent” decides to “Accommodate”, => the “Entrant” will decide to “Enter”, => there is no “Nash”

So, here there is only one NE which is “Fight, Enter” with profit “$70, $0


Related Solutions

An industry consists of an incumbent (firm 1) and a potential entrant (firm 2). Each firm...
An industry consists of an incumbent (firm 1) and a potential entrant (firm 2). Each firm can produce output at a constant marginal cost of $3 per unit. The incumbent has already incurred a sunk cost F but the potential entrant must pay it if it enters. The inverse demand curve is P(Y ) = 12 − Y , where Y is total output. The firms compete in quantities. Firm 1 choose its quantity q1 first. Firm 2 observes q1...
Entry Deterrence. Suppose there is one incumbent monopolist and one potential entrant in a given market....
Entry Deterrence. Suppose there is one incumbent monopolist and one potential entrant in a given market. If the potential entrant stays out, then the monopolist will receive monopoly profits of 100, while the potential entrant will receive profits of 10 from other endeavors. On the other hand, if the potential entrant enters, then the incumbent can ACCOMODATE, or RETALIATE. If he accommodates, then the incumbent and entrant each receive profits of 40. But if the incumbent retaliates, then each receive...
Consider the following two-stage entry-pricing game between an incumbent firm and a potential entrant: 2 players:...
Consider the following two-stage entry-pricing game between an incumbent firm and a potential entrant: 2 players: {incumbent, entrant} Two-stage game: Stage-1: Potential entrant makes its entry decision by choosing from {Enter, Do not enter}; Stage-2: The incumbent and the new entrant engage in simultaneous-move pricing game. If the potential entrant chooses to enter, she must incur a one-time fixed cost of entry, f, prior to engaging in price competition. This cost includes the advertising and marketing expenses which must be...
Let us assume the following regarding 2 firms: Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs...
Let us assume the following regarding 2 firms: Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 4 1 3 1 6 0 4 0 8 1 Please calculate the total abatement costs for both firms (see empty boxes in the table above, what are the corresponding values?) 2 What are the total abatement costs for the firms...
.Suppose that the market demand curve facing the incumbent firm is p = 460 -0.5y.The firms...
.Suppose that the market demand curve facing the incumbent firm is p = 460 -0.5y.The firms total cost curve is c(y) = 100y.The incumbent firm is threatened by a potential entrant, which faces a fixed entry cost K in addition to the variable cost. The entrant’s total cost is therefore c(y) = K + 100y. Find the limit output yL
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 75...
Suppose there are two firms: Firm A and Firm B. These firms are each emitting 75 tons of pollution. Firm A faces marginal abatement cost MACA = 3A and Firm B faces marginal abatement cost MACB = 9A where A is tons of pollution abatement. The government’s control authority wishes the firms to reduce their total emissions by 60 tons using a Cap and Trade system and will initially auction off the permits 1a How many allowances will the control...
Suppose that the industry demand curve is given by P = 120 – 2Q. The monopolist/incumbent...
Suppose that the industry demand curve is given by P = 120 – 2Q. The monopolist/incumbent faces MCM=ACM=40. a) a) Solve for the profit-maximizing level of monopoly output, price, and profits. b) Suppose a potential entrant is considering entering, but the monopolist has a cost advantage. The potential entrant faces costs MCPE=ACPE=60. Assuming the monopolist/incumbent continues to produce the profit-maximizing quantity from part a), solve for the residual demand curve for the entrant. c) Assume the potential entrant follows the...
Assume that there are 2 firms locating in Hotelling’s linear city of length 1. Each firm...
Assume that there are 2 firms locating in Hotelling’s linear city of length 1. Each firm has a constant marginal cost of c. Consumers are uniformly distributed and have identical preferences represented by U=V-Pi-t(x*-xi)2 . where V-is consumer’s reservation value (consumer surplus from consuming her ideal product at zero price), Pi is the price of firm i’s product, x* is consumer’s location, 0≤x 1 and xi is firm i’s location. a) If both firms are required to locate in the...
Assume a monopolist firm with diminishing marginal product. Graph the marginal cost curve. Graph the firm...
Assume a monopolist firm with diminishing marginal product. Graph the marginal cost curve. Graph the firm level demand curve. Graph the firm level marginal revenue curve. Identify the profit maximizing quantity to produce and the corresponding price. What does the price function look like if the monopolist can engage in perfect price discrimination?
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA =...
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA = 4AA and MCB = AB, where AA and AB are the tons of emissions abated by firm A and B, respectively. a. Calculate the total cost if each firm is required to abate 50 tons of emissions. b. Would this policy be cost effective and why? c. What if the government set the total abatement to be 100 tons with tradable allowances, what is...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT