Question

In: Accounting

A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are...

A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are below:

HHS1; new this year and never audited                                   $ 880,000

HHS2; audited last year, no major findings                                        770,000

Department of Transportation 65,000 Department of Agriculture                          485,000

Total Expenditure of Federal Funds                                                    $2,200,000

A. Does the Single Audit Act standard apply here? Why or why not?

B.   What is the Single Audit Act and how does it differ from GAGAS?

C.       Which programs would the auditor be required to audit, explain your reasoning and show your computations.

D         Which Programs would the auditor be required to audit, assuming that all the programs are low risk, explain your reasoning and show your computations?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. Does the Single Audit Act standard apply here? Why or why not?

Yes , the Single Audit Act Standard applies to the question.
The Single Audit Act applies when a Non-Federal Entity had an Expenditure of Federal Funds/Grants/Awards of $ 750,000 or more in their fiscal year.

Non-Federal Entity includes:

1. State and Local Governmnets
2. NPO (Not for Profit Organizations)
3. Indian Tribes
4. Higher Education Institutions

Therefore the Total Expenditure recorded by Local Government is $ 2,200,000. So Single Audit Act find its applicability.

HHS1; new this year and never audited $                                 880,000.00
HHS2; audited last year, no major findings $                                 770,000.00
Department of Transportation $                                   65,000.00
Department of Agriculture $                                 485,000.00
$                             2,200,000.00

B.   What is the Single Audit Act and how does it differ from GAGAS?

Single Audit Act is used by Federal Governments as a tool to determine whether or not the Entity has complied with Direct and Material Compliance Requirements for each program. It ensures adherence of Federal Governments Requirement with respect to fund usage and compliance to ensure Sound Financial Management, bringing about uniform guidelines for audits and effective and effective utilisation of available resources.

This Act is called Single Audit Act because it Merges various audit requiremnts for different Federal Grants/Awards into a Single Audit.

How Does it Differs from GAGAS ?

Both Single Audit and GAGAS (Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards Audits) or Yellow Book Audits go simultaneously.

Single Audit is an Audit of Management and Usage of Funds by the Receiver and other compliances attached with such Grant/Reward. It covers both Financial and Compliance Requirements.

On the other hand GAGAS Audits or Yellow Book Audits is an Overall Audit aimed at forming and expressing an opinion over Financial Statements of Government Organisations/Entities.

So the basic difference is that Single Audit is Audit of a Part of Financial Statements i.e. Federal Funds/Grants Expended while GAGAS Audit is a complete Audit i.e. Entity as a whole of its Financial Statements.

For any Single Audit performed a GAGAS Audit follows.

C.Which programs would the auditor be required to audit, explain your reasoning and show your computations.

An Auditor is First required to identify or Categorize the Programs in TYPE A or TYPE B.

Therefore the condition applicable would be " Total Federal Awards expended during the Year is equal to or Exceeds $ 750,000 but Equal to ot less than $ 25,000,000 . Then any Program expending more than $ 750,000 is a TYPE A Program.

All else programs which do not satisfies the criteria for TYPE A Program is considered as TYPE B Program.

Program Expenditure Type
HHS1; new this year and never audited $                                 880,000.00 A
HHS2; audited last year, no major findings $                                 770,000.00 A
Department of Transportation $                                   65,000.00 B
Department of Agriculture $                                 485,000.00 B
$                             2,200,000.00

A Risk Assessment of TYPE B or TYPE B Programs needs to be done to identify the Low Risk or High Risk Programs.

HIgh Risk TYPE A Program : HHS1 (This is because it has not been audited at least once in Past 2 Years)

Low Risk TYPE A Program : HHS2 (It has been audited once last year and no material weakness or any Modified Opinion or Questioned Costs excedding 5% of Total Federal Expenditure has been Reported)

For TYPE B Programs, Minimum 25% of Number Low Risk TYPE A Programs are considered as High Risk TYPE B Programs i.e.,  

Low Risk TYPE A Program : 1

MInimum 25% of TYPE A Program = 25% *1 = 0.25 or 0 (Rounded Off)

In Assessing the Risk of TYPE B Programs Auditor Should use Professional Judgement and Guidance.

Low Risk TYPE B Program : Department of Transportation

Low Risk TYPE B Program : Department of Agriculture

Therefore Auditor is Require to Audit TYPE A Program HHS1 only.


Related Solutions

A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are...
A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are below: HHS1; new this year and never audited                                   $ 880,000 HHS2; audited last year, no major findings                                        770,000 Department of Transportation 65,000 Department of Agriculture                          485,000 Total Expenditure of Federal Funds                                                    $2,200,000 Which Programs would the auditor be required to audit, assuming that all the programs are low risk, explain your reasoning and show your computations?
A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are...
A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are below: HHS1; new this year and never audited                                   $ 880,000 HHS2; audited last year, no major findings                                        770,000 Department of Transportation 65,000 Department of Agriculture                          485,000 Total Expenditure of Federal Funds                                                    $2,200,000 Which Programs would the auditor be required to audit, assuming that all the programs are low risk, explain your reasoning and show your computations?
A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are...
A local government has four federal programs. Expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2020, are below: HHS1; new this year and never audited                                   $ 880,000 HHS2; audited last year, no major findings                                        770,000 Department of Transportation 65,000 Department of Agriculture                          485,000 Total Expenditure of Federal Funds                                                    $2,200,000 A. Does the Single Audit Act standard apply here? Why or why not? B.   What is the Single Audit Act and how does it differ from GAGAS? C.      ...
During the year ended 30 June 2020, Resources Ltd explored four different areas of interest and...
During the year ended 30 June 2020, Resources Ltd explored four different areas of interest and spent $102,700 in each. The results of E&E activities suggested that Areas A, B and C may contain mineral reserves so the company acquired leases over these three areas. The leases cost $151,000, $202,300 and $176,400 respectively. During the year ended 30 June 2021, Resources Ltd commenced a drilling program to evaluate Areas A, B and C. Eight exploratory wells were drilled, five in...
In which case did the taxpayer derive assessable income during the year ended 30 June 2020?...
In which case did the taxpayer derive assessable income during the year ended 30 June 2020? a. Fridge World sells refrigerators. On 30 June 2020, it sells a refrigerator for $2,000. The customer enters into a lay-by arrangement by paying an initial deposit of $400. For the next four weeks, the customer continues to make $400 payments until the final $200 instalment is paid on 2 August 2020; b. Learn to Dance is a dancing school. On 30 June 2020,...
During the year ended 30 June 2020, Starhub Ltd acquired the following investments in shares issued...
During the year ended 30 June 2020, Starhub Ltd acquired the following investments in shares issued by other companies: M3 Ltd $480 000 (42% of issued capital) Republic Ltd $680 000 (35% of issued capital) Starhub Ltd is unsure how to account for these investments and asked you for some professional advice. Specifically, Starhub Ltd is concerned that it may need to prepare consolidated financial statements under AASB 10. The company provided the following information about the two investee companies:...
(a) Prepare a Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 30 June 2020 using the...
(a) Prepare a Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 30 June 2020 using the direct method, ignoring GST. Show all workings on the Workings page. (b) Using the relevant information from the question above, identify two (2) specific items (including their values) which causes a difference between Net Profit and Net Cash from Operating Activities and analyse why it causes a difference. The following financial statements relate to Clarke Ltd for the financial year ended 30 June 2020....
During an audit of the inventory records of Winthrop Ltd for the year ended June 30,...
During an audit of the inventory records of Winthrop Ltd for the year ended June 30, 2019, the auditor discovered that the ending inventory balance was overvalued by $180,000. On further investigation, it was discovered that the ending inventory for the previous year was correctly counted and valued, but that the inventory balance as at June 30, 2017, was undervalued by $500,000. Spurred on by the concern for errors undetected in previous periods, a thorough investigation was carried out as...
The following information relates to a company ABC Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020:...
The following information relates to a company ABC Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020: Transaction totals for the year ended 30 June 2020 R Credit purchases of raw materials 503750 Freight on raw materiasl purchased (on credit) 99833 Sales of finished producgts 11440000 Direct Labour: Factory wages 828600 Pension fund contributions paid by employer 172500 Medical aid paid by employer 227200 UIF Contributions paid by employer 8144 Indirect Labour 500250 Electricity Factory 211450 Administration offices 127900 Rent Expenses...
Rupert Ltd is preparing a Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 30 June 2020. The...
Rupert Ltd is preparing a Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 30 June 2020. The following information is available: 2020 2019 Cash at Bank 788 556 Accounts Receivable 775 610 Inventory 834 867 Accounts Payable 521 501 Salaries Payable 90 360 The Income Statement contained the following data as at 30 June: 2020 Credit sales 6,583 Cost of sales 3,400 Wages expense 1,070 Other expenses 1,920 Required: Using the direct method, prepare the Operating Activities section of the Cash...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT