Question

distinguish between the various service organization controls (SOC) reporting options available to auditors who evaluate cloud computing service providers.

Answer 1

Answer :

As a service organization, you are familiar with audit requests from clients who are required to meet specific compliance and audit requirements. You have most likely been asked whether your organization is SOC 1 Compliant or SOC 2 Compliant. What are the differences between a SOC 1 and SOC 2? Which SOC report should I get? Do I need both? These are questions we, as auditors, are frequently asked. Let’s take a look at the differences between the two, and why you could be asked for either, or both, as you continue to grow your business

A Service Organization Control 1, or SOC 1 engagement, is an audit of the internal controls at a service organization which have been implemented to protect client data. SOC 1 engagements are performed in accordance with the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16 (SSAE 16). A SOC 1 assessment is comprised of control objectives, which are used to accurately represent internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). In other words, if you are hosting financial information that could affect your client’s financial reporting, then a SOC 1 audit report makes the most sense for your organization to pursue, and will likely be requested of you.

If you are hosting or processing other types of information for your clients that does not impact their financial reporting, then you may be asked for a SOC 2 audit report. In this instance, your clients are likely concerned whether you are handling their data in a secure way, and if it is available to them in the way you have contracted it to be. A SOC 2 report, similar to a SOC 1 report, evaluates internal controls, policies, and procedures. However, the difference is that a SOC 2 reports on controls that directly relate to the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy at a service organization. These criteria are known as the Trust Services Principles, and are the foundation of any SOC 2 audit engagement.

If you have clients that fall under both categories, then there is a chance you may be asked for both. In some circumstances, you may determine that you need a SOC 1 and a SOC 2 report in order to effectively ensure that your controls meet the demands of a variety of clients and stakeholders. Fortunately, KirkpatrickPrice utilizes a unique Online Audit Manager that allows you to combine a SOC 1 and SOC 2 into one audit process resulting in two deliverables.

So which report makes the most sense for your organization? Should you pursue a SOC 1 or a SOC 2? Do you need both? Determining what your business objectives are is a vital first step in deciding which SOC audit you should pursue. KirkpatrickPrice can provide free consulting services to help you determine which SOC report makes the most sense for your organization and assist in determining the scope of your engagement. Think you may need multiple reports? We can help with that too. KirkpatrickPrice’s Online Audit Manager was designed to help take the stress away from meeting multiple audit demands by streamlining them into one efficient audit process.