Question

In: Statistics and Probability

To test compliance with authority, a classical experiment in social psychology requires subjects to administer increasingly...

To test compliance with authority, a classical experiment in social psychology
requires subjects to administer increasingly painful electric shocks to seemingly
helpless victims who agonize in an adjacent room.* Each subject earns a score
between 0 and 30, depending on the point at which the subject refuses to comply
with authority—an investigator, dressed in a white lab coat, who orders the
administration of increasingly intense shocks. A score of 0 signifies the subject’s
unwillingness to comply at the very outset, and a score of 30 signifies the subject’s
willingness to comply completely with the experimenter’s orders.

Ignore the very real ethical issues raised by this type of experiment, and assume
that you want to study the effect of a “committee atmosphere” on compliance with
authority. In one condition, shocks are administered only after an affirmative decision
by the committee, consisting of one real subject and two associates of the investigator,
who act as subjects but, in fact, merely go along with the decision of the real
subject. In the other condition, shocks are administered only after an affirmative
decision by a solitary real subject.

A total of 12 subjects are randomly assigned, in equal numbers, to the committee
condition (X1) and to the solitary condition (X2). A compliance score is obtained for
each subject. Use t to test the null hypothesis at the .05 level of significance.

COMPLIANCE SCORES
COMMITTEE SOLITARY
2 3
5 8
20 7
15 10
4 14
10 0

Solutions

Expert Solution

Assumed population mean(u)=10, because not given in the data,
Given that,
sample mean, x =8.1667
standard deviation, s =5.9365
number (n)=12
null, Ho: μ=10
alternate, H1: μ!=10
level of significance, α = 0.05
from standard normal table, two tailed t α/2 =2.201
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if to < -2.201 OR if to > 2.201
we use test statistic (t) = x-u/(s.d/sqrt(n))
to =8.1667-10/(5.9365/sqrt(12))
to =-1.0698
| to | =1.0698
critical value
the value of |t α| with n-1 = 11 d.f is 2.201
we got |to| =1.0698 & | t α | =2.201
make decision
hence value of |to | < | t α | and here we do not reject Ho
p-value :two tailed ( double the one tail ) - Ha : ( p != -1.0698 ) = 0.3076
hence value of p0.05 < 0.3076,here we do not reject Ho
ANSWERS
---------------
null, Ho: μ=10
alternate, H1: μ!=10
test statistic: -1.0698
critical value: -2.201 , 2.201
decision: do not reject Ho
p-value: 0.3076
we do not have enough evidence to support the claim that compliance with authority, a classical experiment in social psychology
requires subjects to administer increasingly painful electric shocks to seemingly
helpless victims who agonize in an adjacent room.


Related Solutions

14.11 To test compliance with authority, a classical experiment in social psychology requires subjects to administer...
14.11 To test compliance with authority, a classical experiment in social psychology requires subjects to administer increasingly painful electric shocks to seemingly helpless victims who agonize in an adjacent room. Each subject earns a score between 0 and 30, depending on the point at which the subject refuses to comply with authority—an investigator, dressed in a white lab coat, who orders the administration of increasingly intense shocks. A score of 0 signifies the subject’s unwillingness to comply at the very...
The “Robber’s Cave” experiment is important in social psychology. Tell what happened in the study. Explain...
The “Robber’s Cave” experiment is important in social psychology. Tell what happened in the study. Explain the significance of the study.
7 and 8 go together 7.  Two groups of subjects participated in an experiment designed to test...
7 and 8 go together 7.  Two groups of subjects participated in an experiment designed to test the effect of frustration on aggression.  The experimental group of 40 subjects received a frustrating puzzle to solve, while the control group of 70 subjects received a very easy version of the same puzzle.  Levels of aggression was measured for both groups where higher scores are indicative of higher levels of aggression.  The experimental group (high frustration) had a mean aggression score of 4.0 and a standard...
Summarize what can be learned from Zimbardo's prison experiment using the principles of social psychology. What...
Summarize what can be learned from Zimbardo's prison experiment using the principles of social psychology. What were 3 things you were surprised to learn? Was there a bias?
Consider n experiment to test the effect of caffeine on athletic performance. Twenty-five subjects were included...
Consider n experiment to test the effect of caffeine on athletic performance. Twenty-five subjects were included in the study. Each subject was initially given two tests, a swimming, and a running. The subject then consumed caffeine and then repeated the two tests. Score was recorded for each of the four series of tests. A) Suggest model with appropriate notation. B) Consider the null hypothesis that consumption of caffeine has no effect on either the mean swim score or the mean...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT