In: Statistics and Probability
Please answer the following questions based on the given graph
YEAR | Year Number | Domestic |
1997 | 1 | 3210113 |
1998 | 2 | 3294244 |
1999 | 3 | 3150826 |
2000 | 4 | 3244421 |
2001 | 5 | 3358399 |
2002 | 6 | 3289148 |
2003 | 7 | 3326111 |
2004 | 8 | 3423024 |
2005 | 9 | 3772952 |
2006 | 10 | 4349081 |
2007 | 11 | 4937099 |
2008 | 12 | 5106860 |
2009 | 13 | 4704189 |
(1) Create a Time Series (Trend)Model for passengers on Domestic flights. (To zero decimal places) The predicted amount of passengers for 2010 on Domestic flights is ________.
(2) Create a Time Series (Trend)Model for passengers on Domestic flights. (To zero decimal places) On average, the number of passengers of domestic flights increase by ________each year, keeping all else equal.
(3)Create a GrowthModel for passengers on Domestic flights. (To zero decimal places) The predicted amount of passengers for 2010 on Domestic flights is ________.
(4)Create a Growth Model for passengers on Domestic flights. (To two decimal places) On average, the number of passengers of domestic flights increase by ________percent each year, keeping all else equal.
(5) Based on R-squared which model is better for predicting
passengers of domestic flights?
Time Series (Trend) Model
Growth Model
For part 1, the predicted amount of passengers for 2010 on Domestic flights is 4,914,712 passengers using the Trend function [=TREND(B2:B14,A2:A14,A15:A17)] in Excel 2007
For part 2, since it is a linear curve, the diffence in the trend will give increase in passengers per year, that is 161,811
For part 3, we use the Growth function [=GROWTH(C2:C14,B2:B14,B15)]
YEAR | Domestic |
1997 | 3210113 |
1998 | 3294244 |
1999 | 3150826 |
2000 | 3244421 |
2001 | 3358399 |
2002 | 3289148 |
2003 | 3326111 |
2004 | 3423024 |
2005 | 3772952 |
2006 | 4349081 |
2007 | 4937099 |
2008 | 5106860 |
2009 | 4704189 |
2010 | 4955973 |
4. We calculate the percentage [=(C16-C15)*100/C15] after extrapolating using the GROWTH function.
2011 | 5162572 | 4.17% |
2012 | 5377784 | 4.17% |
2013 | 5601967 | 4.17% |
2014 | 5835496 | 4.17% |
2015 | 6078760 | 4.17% |
2016 | 6332164 | 4.17% |
2017 | 6596133 | 4.17% |
5.
[=CORREL(B2:B22,C2:C22)] and then it is squared, or else [=RSQ(B2:B22,C2:C22)]
2010 | 4914712 | |||
2011 | 5076523 | |||
2012 | 5238334 | |||
2013 | 5400145 | |||
2014 | 5561956 | |||
2015 | 5723767 | |||
2016 | 5885578 | |||
2017 | 6047389 | |||
0.964582 | ||||
0.930419 | 0.930419 |
Table for growth
2010 | 4955973 | |||
2011 | 5162572 | 4.17% | ||
2012 | 5377784 | 4.17% | ||
2013 | 5601967 | 4.17% | ||
2014 | 5835496 | 4.17% | ||
2015 | 6078760 | 4.17% | ||
2016 | 6332164 | 4.17% | ||
2017 | 6596133 | 4.17% | ||
0.968536 | ||||
0.938062 | 0.938062 | |||
Although both have data around the mean, the higher R2 value of the growth model indicates that it is a better fit as compared to the trend model.