Question

In: Economics

1. Consider the following game: L R L 2,1 0,0 R 1,0 3,2 a)Find all Nash...

1. Consider the following game:

L R
L 2,1 0,0
R 1,0 3,2

a)Find all Nash equilibria and derive the players’ expected payoffs in each of the Nash equilibria.

b)Now change the payoffs slightly so that

L R
L 2,1

2,0

R 1,0 3,2

i.Derive all Nash equilibria for this modified game.

ii.Have any of the Nash equilibria changed? If so, for each player explain why the player has or has not changed her strategy.

c) Do the players in these games have good reasons for wanting to be unpredictable? Explain

Solutions

Expert Solution

Nash equillibrium is a strategy from which no one wants to deviate.

  • Nash equilibrium : (2,1) and (3,2) because
    • If A chose L --> B choose L (see table)

and if B chose L --> A choose L

=> L,L =(2,1) is Nash equilibrium

  • If A chose R --> B choose R

and if B chose R --> A choose R

=> R,R = (3,2) is also Nash equilibrium

  • Expected payoff for player A (note : probability is written in brackets)

Expected payoff for player B;

Putting values of a and b in expected value equations we get,

Expected value of player A = 1.5

Expected value of player B = 0.67

  • Nash equilibrium
    • If A chose L --> B choose L

Now, If B choose L --> A choose L

=> L,L (2,1) is Nash equilibrium

  • If A chose R --> B choose R

Now if B choose R --> A choose R

=> R,R (3,2) is Nash equillibrium

  • The players have not changed their startegy.

Related Solutions

Consider the following stage game Strategy L R T (3,2) (1,5) B (2,1) (1,1) It is...
Consider the following stage game Strategy L R T (3,2) (1,5) B (2,1) (1,1) It is repeated over two periods. The payoffs of the players over the two periods is the sum of the payoffs over the two periods. Is there a subgame perfect equilibrium of the repeated game in which (T,L) is played in period 1? If so, describe the equilibrium. If not, explain why not.
Find all Nash equilibria in the following three simultaneous-move games: Game 1 : Column Left Center...
Find all Nash equilibria in the following three simultaneous-move games: Game 1 : Column Left Center Right Up 3,1 4,2 3,3 High 5,7 1,3 2,4 Low 6,1 2,5 3,4 Down 1,1 4,6 5,2 Game 2: Left Right Up 2,4 7,7 Down 3,12 5,8 Game 3: Left Right Up 2,4 3,3 Down . 6,0 1,5
Find a basis for the subspace of R4 spanned by (1,0,-2,1), (2,-1,2,1), (1,1,1,1), (0,1,0,1), (0,1,1,0) containing...
Find a basis for the subspace of R4 spanned by (1,0,-2,1), (2,-1,2,1), (1,1,1,1), (0,1,0,1), (0,1,1,0) containing the first and fifth vectors
1. (a) Find the directional derivative of f at (2,1) in the direction from (2,1) to...
1. (a) Find the directional derivative of f at (2,1) in the direction from (2,1) to (6,-2). Show your work clearly. (b) Find a unit vector u such that the directional derivative of f in the direction of u at (2,1) is zero. Show all work required to justify your answer.
Find the total number of Nash equilibria of the “divide a dollar” game.
Find the total number of Nash equilibria of the “divide a dollar” game.
A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing...
A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing the best strategy they can, given the choices being made by all the other players. B. a strategy which is always inferior for a player to choose, regardless of what other players do. C. an outcome in which all players experience their best possible collective outcome. D. an outcome in which a player receives his/her best possible individual payoff. The prisoners’ dilemma game A....
Consider the following payoff table for an evolutionary game: X Y X (0,0) (1,4) Y (4,1)...
Consider the following payoff table for an evolutionary game: X Y X (0,0) (1,4) Y (4,1) (0,0) 1. If we consider this table as a normal form game, in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium the probability of X is?
A. 1/2 B. 1/3 C. 1/4 D. 1/5 E. 1/6 F. 1/7 G. 1/8 H. 1/9 2. The mixed equilibrium you found is Consider the following payoff table for an evolutionary game: X Y X (3,3) (1,3) Y (3,1) (2,2) 1....
(a) Show that the lines r 1 (t) = (2,1,−4) + t(−1,1,−1) and r 2 (s)...
(a) Show that the lines r 1 (t) = (2,1,−4) + t(−1,1,−1) and r 2 (s) = (1,0,0) + s(0,1,−2) are skew. (b) The two lines in (a) lie in parallel planes. Find equations for these two planes. Express your answer in the form ax+by+cz +d = 0. [Hint: The two planes will share a normal vector n. How would one find n?] would one find n?]
Consider the following two-player game: L C R T 2,2 0,2 0,1 M 2,0 1,1 0,2...
Consider the following two-player game: L C R T 2,2 0,2 0,1 M 2,0 1,1 0,2 B 1,0 2,0 0,0 (a) Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (b) Consider the following procedure of iterated elimination of weakly dominated actions : all weakly dominated actions of each player are eliminated at each stage. What are the action profiles that survive this procedure in the above game? I have no problem with solving (a) but (b) is so difficult....
Prove that in a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of a finite strategic game, all the pure...
Prove that in a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of a finite strategic game, all the pure strategies that are assigned positive probabilities must have the same expected payoff.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT