Question

In: Statistics and Probability

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with...

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity 18 Ni maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For m = 34 specimens, the sample average toughness was x = 63.4 for the high-purity steel, whereas for n = 37 specimens of commercial steel y = 57.8. Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial-purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

(a) Assuming that σ1 = 1.2 and σ2 = 1.1, test the relevant hypotheses using α = 0.001. (Use μ1μ2, where μ1 is the average toughness for high-purity steel and μ2 is the average toughness for commercial steel.)
Calculate the test statistic and determine the P-value. (Round your test statistic to two decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.)

z =
P-value =

(b) Compute β for the test conducted in part (a) when μ1μ2 = 6. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
β =


You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

Ho :   µ1 - µ2 =   5          
Ha :   µ1-µ2 > 5          
                  
Level of Significance ,    α =    0.001          
                  
sample #1   ------->              
mean of sample 1,    x̅1=   63.4          
population std dev of sample 1,   σ1 =    1.2          
size of sample 1,    n1=   34          
                  
sample #2   --------->              
mean of sample 2,    x̅2=   57.8          
population std dev of sample 2,   σ2 =    1.1          
size of sample 2,    n2=   37          
                  
difference in sample means = x̅1 - x̅2 =    63.4   -   57.8   =   5.6
                  
std error , SE =    √(σ1²/n1+σ2²/n2) =    0.2740          
                  
Z-statistic = ((x̅1 - x̅2)-µd)/SE = (5.6-5) /   0.2740   =   2.19

p-value = 0.0143 [Excel function =NORMSDIST(-z)  

b)

ß = P(Z< Zα/2 - true difference in mean/SE)  - P(Z < -Zα/2 - true difference in mean/SE)
Zα =       3.0902   (right tailed test)

ß = P(Z< 3.0902 - (6-5)/0.2740) - P(Z< -3.0902 - (6-5)/0.2740) = P(Z<-0.5594 ) - P(Z< -6.7398) = 0.2879 - 0.000 = 0.2879(answer)


Related Solutions

Suppose an experiment was conducted to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity steel of some type...
Suppose an experiment was conducted to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity steel of some type with commercial-purity steel of the same type. For 9 high-purity specimens, the sample mean toughness and sample standard deviation of toughness (in some scale) were 1.82 and 0.6, respectively, whereas for 9 commercial-purity specimens, the sample mean and sample standard deviations were 2.43 and 0.82, respectively. Assume the data for both the high- and commercial-purity steels are normally distributed. Does this data suggest that...
The following observations were made on fracture toughness of base plate of 18% nickel maraging steel...
The following observations were made on fracture toughness of base plate of 18% nickel maraging steel in ksi √in. 69.5, 71.9, 72.6, 73.1, 73.3, 73.5, 75.5, 75.7, 75.8, 76.1, 76.2, 76.2, 77.0, 77.9, 78.1, 79.6, 79.7, 79.9, 80.1, 82.2, 83.7, 93.7, (a) Explain why the t-curve is more appropriate than the z-curve in this case. (b) Based upon this study, find the 99% lower confidence bound of the mean fracture toughness.(c) Find the 95% confidence interval.
please compare the plane strain fracture toughness and Charpy test
please compare the plane strain fracture toughness and Charpy test
Compare Mild Steel & High tensile steel used in the construction industry
Compare Mild Steel & High tensile steel used in the construction industry
Compare Mild Steel & High tensile steel used in the construction industry
Compare Mild Steel & High tensile steel used in the construction industry
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number of cycles to crack initiation is measured for twenty specimens over a range of applied pseudo-stress amplitude (PSA) levels. Use the data in the table provided to fit the following three regression models with y = Cycles and x = PSA (note the natural log transform of y for all models): PSA (x) Cycles (y) 80, 97379 80, 340084 80, 246163 80, 239348 100,...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number of cycles to crack initiation is measured for twenty specimens over a range of applied pseudo-stress amplitude (PSA) levels. Use the data in the table provided to fit the following three regression models with y = Cycles and x = PSA (note the natural log transform of y for all models): PSA (x) Cycles (y) 80, 97379 80, 340084 80, 246163 80, 239348 100,...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number of cycles to crack initiation is measured for twenty specimens over a range of applied pseudo-stress amplitude (PSA) levels. Use the data in the table provided to fit the following three regression models with y = Cycles and x = PSA (note the natural log transform of y for all models): PSA (x) Cycles (y) 80, 97379 80, 340084 80, 246163 80, 239348 100,...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number...
An experiment is performed to study the fatigue performance of a high strength alloy. The number of cycles to crack initiation is measured for twenty specimens over a range of applied pseudo-stress amplitude (PSA) levels. Use the data in the table provided to fit the following three regression models with y = Cycles and x = PSA (note the natural log transform of y for all models): PSA Cycles 80        97379 80        340084 80        246163 80        239348 100      34346 100     ...
Compare and contrast the Ni-NTA chromatography experiment and the HIC technique . Name three general techniques...
Compare and contrast the Ni-NTA chromatography experiment and the HIC technique . Name three general techniques or tools used in the Ni-NTA chromatography What is histidine? Why is His6 such a popular protein tag for purification? Summarize how the scientists produced the different variants of His6-GFP protein samples for purification. How do we use His6/Ni-NTA interactions in experiments?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT