In: Accounting
Wellsley Containers currently uses a recycled plastic to make bottles for the food industry.
Current bottle production? information:
The cost and time standards per batch of 10,000 bottles are as ?follows:
Plastic 360 kilograms at $11.00 per kg |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct labor 6.0 hours at $20.00 per hour The variable manufacturing overhead rate is based on total estimated variable manufacturing overhead of $500,000 and estiamted total DLH of 10,000. Wellsley allocates its variable manufacturing overhead based on direct labor hours (DLH). Proposed changes to bottle design and production? process: The container division manager is considering having both the bottle redesigned and the bottle production process reengineered so that the plastic usage would drop by 30 % overall due both to generating less scrap in the manufacturing process and using less plastic in each bottle. In addition to decreasing the amount of plastic used in producing the? bottles, the additional following benefits would be?realized:
|
Formula sheet
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N |
2 | |||||||||||||
3 | Before re-engineering the process: | ||||||||||||
4 | Direct Materials i.e. Plastic required per batch | 360 | Kg | ||||||||||
5 | Price of Plastic | 11 | Per Kg | ||||||||||
6 | Direct Labor per Batch | 6 | hours | ||||||||||
7 | Labor Rate | 20 | per hour | ||||||||||
8 | Estimated Variable Manufacturing Overhead | 500000 | |||||||||||
9 | Estimated Labour Hours | 10000 | |||||||||||
10 | Overhead Rate | =D8/D9 | |||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||||
12 | Changes due to re-engineering: | ||||||||||||
13 | Reduction in plastic usage | 0.3 | |||||||||||
14 | Reduction in direct labour hours | 0.2 | |||||||||||
15 | Reduction in variable manufacturing overhead | 0.1 | |||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||||
17 | After re-engineering the process: | ||||||||||||
18 | Direct Materials i.e. Plastic required per batch | =D4*(1-D13) | Kg | ||||||||||
19 | Price of Plastic | 11 | Per Kg | ||||||||||
20 | Direct Labor per Batch | =D6*(1-D14) | hours | ||||||||||
21 | Labor Rate | 20 | per hour | ||||||||||
22 | Estimated Variable Manufacturing Overhead | =D8*(1-D15) | |||||||||||
23 | Estimated Labour Hours | =D9*(1-D14) | |||||||||||
24 | Overhead Rate | =D22/D23 | |||||||||||
25 | |||||||||||||
26 | 1) | ||||||||||||
27 | Standard cost per batch using current data before any changes: | ||||||||||||
28 | Manufacturing cost | Standard cost per batch | |||||||||||
29 | Direct materials | =D4*D5 | |||||||||||
30 | Direct labor | =D6*D7 | |||||||||||
31 | Variable MOH | =D10*D6 | |||||||||||
32 | Total standard cost | =SUM(D29:D31) | |||||||||||
33 | |||||||||||||
34 | Hence Standard Cost per Batch with current data is | =D32 | |||||||||||
35 | |||||||||||||
36 | 2) | ||||||||||||
37 | Standard cost per batch after re-engineering the process: | ||||||||||||
38 | Manufacturing cost | Standard cost per batch | |||||||||||
39 | Direct materials | =D18*D19 | |||||||||||
40 | Direct labor | =D20*D21 | |||||||||||
41 | Variable MOH | =D24*D20 | |||||||||||
42 | Total standard cost | =SUM(D39:D41) | |||||||||||
43 | |||||||||||||
44 | Hence Standard cost per batch after re-engineering the process is | =D42 | |||||||||||
45 | |||||||||||||
46 | 3) | ||||||||||||
47 | |||||||||||||
48 | Standard Cost per Batch with current data | =D34 | |||||||||||
49 | Standard cost per batch after re-engineering the process | =D44 | |||||||||||
50 | Cost saving per Batch | =D48-D49 | =D48-D49 | ||||||||||
51 | |||||||||||||
52 | Hence cost saving per batch due to re-engineering is | =D50 | |||||||||||
53 | |||||||||||||
54 | Cost of implementing the changes | 434700 | |||||||||||
55 | |||||||||||||
56 | Number of Batches required to be produced to cover the cost | =Cost of implementation / Cost saving per batch | |||||||||||
57 | =D54/D52 | =D54/D52 | |||||||||||
58 | |||||||||||||
59 | Hence number of Batches required is | =D57 | |||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||
61 | 4) | ||||||||||||
62 | The scrap generated will be lesser due to less amount of scrap generated. | ||||||||||||
63 | Fixed overhead may also decrease due to less scrap generated such as rent expense may decrease as space required to store the scrap will be lesser. | ||||||||||||
64 | Also, transportation cost will decrease due to lesser amount of materials required. | ||||||||||||
65 | |||||||||||||
66 | Using less plastic in the bottle may have negative impact on the quality of the bottle. | ||||||||||||
67 | Therefore, market acceptance of the lower weight bottle need to be checked before implementation of the project. | ||||||||||||
68 |