Question

Many work groups consist of employees from a variety of different sections of the organization (ie, someone from sales, someone from engineering, someone from accounting, etc.). While other work groups consist of a smaller subsection of the individual sections themselves (for instance, 4 of the 15 people from accounting).

Which work group would be easier to be a part of, the heterogeneous (diversified) group or the homogeneous (similar) group. Which do you think would get the most work done? What would be the benefit of having each? Or even why would we use a group that wouldn't get the most work done?

Give some examples of work groups that you have been a part of. What was good and bad.

Answer 1

Ans: The heterogeneous or diversified group would be easier to be a part of workgroup because it will help in forming innovative solution, encourages inventiveness and provide the diversified talents and experience which will be appropriate to the job.

The heterogeneous group will get more work done because in that group they manage to arrange upon various problem-solving responsibilities.

Benefits of the heterogeneous group:

• Concise proficient disciples stay at a decreased chance of happening defamed.
• Expectations concerning every adherent stay directed at a more powerful extent.
• Encourages inventiveness and invigorate modification.

Benefits of the homogeneous group

• There's a huger extent toward everybody complete each chore.
• They seem convenient and adequately stimulated to study at around the equivalent pace.
• It grants owners provisions of implied workers that partake educational and informative standards.

For eg: Cooperative decision-making wherever people continue seeking to achieve collectively to proceed toward remarkable most suitable explication.

Pros:

• Accommodates more distinguished potency.

Cons:

• The upper management can restraint in phases of the worker's corporal reliability.