In: Statistics and Probability
Rosene (1950) studied how quickly hairs on radish roots absorbed
water when they were immersed.
For each of eleven radishes, she measured the rate of influx of
water for a young root hair and an
old root hair on that radish. The data is given below.
Radish Old Young
A ---------0.89------ 2.13
B -------- 0.49-------1.16
C----------0.91------ 2.60
D----------0.80 ------1.58
E-------- 0.56------ 1.53
F--------- 0.79 -----1.70
G --------0.47------- 2.67
H ---------0.50 ------2.64
I ----------1.08 -------2.19
J---------- 1.65 -------2.54
K ---------1.94 -------4.46
Table 1: Radish root hair absorption data. Rates are in cubic
microns per square micron per
minute.
For each pair, the \Young" number is bigger than the \Old" number,
so even without a test
it's clear that young roots take in water more quickly. But how
much more quickly?
1. Explain what test we should use and why: one sample test, paired
samples test or
two independent samples test .
2. (a) Use a normal probability (qqnorm) plot of the di erences
(old minus young)
and the sample size to explain why: We should be hesitant to do a
t-test on these
di erences (old minus young);
(b) Explain why: We should not take the logs of these di erences
(old minus
young.)
3. Instead of using the differences, we can look at the ratio: old
divided by young.
This ratio looks to come from a much closer to normal distribution.
Write R code to find a
90% con dence interval for the average value of this ratio.
1. We should use : paired samples test because a paired t-test is used to compare two population means. where one sample observation paired to other sample observation.
2(a): Using R:
Use a normal probability (qqnorm) plot of the difference (old minus young) and the sample size.
We can not use t.test because the difference (old minus young) does not follow normality.
2(b): We should not take the logs of these difference (old minus young.)
3: After take division of Old by Young. our data follow normality then we can use one sample t test for 90% Confidence Interval.
90% CI = (0.331, 0.480)