Question

In: Accounting

     Meadows Laboratories holds a valuable patent for a “gazak”. The history of costs      associated...

     Meadows Laboratories holds a valuable patent for a “gazak”. The history of costs

     associated with the “gazak” are as follows.

           Date                 Activity          Cost

     2000 – 2001     Research conducted to develop “gazak”                       $117,000

     Mar. 2002         Design and construction of a prototype                             81,500

     Oct. 2002          Testing simulations                                                           36,750

     Feb. 2003         Redesigning based on simulation results                         41,250

     Apr. 2004          Legal fees paid for patent granted May, 2004                   69,955

     May. 2008         Legal fees paid to successfully defend patent                  23,205

     Jan. 2010          Research aimed at modifying the “gazak” design             17,500

     Oct. 2013          Legal fees paid to successfully defend patent                  11,240

     Meadows assumed a useful life of 17 years for the patent in May, 2004. On January

     1, 2012, it revised its useful life estimate downward to 6 remaining years.

     Amortization is computed for a full year if the cost is incurred prior to July 1, and no

     amortization for the year if the cost is incurred after June 30. The company’s year

     ends December 31.

Instructions – Compute the carrying value of the “gazak” on each of the following dates:

  1. December 31, 2005
  2. December 31, 2008
  3. December 31, 2011
  4. December 31, 2013
  5. December 31, 2015

Solutions

Expert Solution

Computation of carrying value of Gazak on the following dates :

a) As on Dec 31st 2005:

  

Date Activity Cost ( Amount in $ )

     2000 – 2001 Research conducted to develop “gazak”                       117,000

     Mar. 2002         Design and construction of a prototype                             81,500

     Oct. 2002          Testing simulations                                                           36,750

     Feb. 2003         Redesigning based on simulation results                         41,250   

     Apr. 2004          Legal fees paid for patent granted May, 2004                   69,955

Total Cost $ 3,46,455

No .of Year's - 17 years

Amortization for 2000 - 2001 - 1,17,000 / 17 = $ 6,882

Amortization for 2002 - 1,91,618 / 17 = $ 11,271

Amortization for 2003 - 2,21,597 / 17 = $ 13,035

Amortization for 2004 - 2,08,561 / 17 = $ 12,268

Total amortization upto 2014 - $ 43,456

Amortization for 2015 - ($ 3,46,455 - $43,456 ) / 17 = $ 17,823

Carrying value as on dec 31 2015 = $ 3,46,455 - $ 43,456 - $17,823 = $ 2,85,176

b) As on Dec 31st 2008:

Carrying value as on 1st jan 2008 = $ 2,51,625 { 2,85,176 - (2,85,176 /17 * 2) }

Cost incurred - $ 23,205

Revised cost - $ 2,74,830

Amortization for 2008 - $ 16,166

Carrying value as on 2008 : $ 2,58,663

C) As on dec 31st 2011 :

  Carrying value as on 1st jan 2011 - $ 2,28,232 { 2,58,663 - (2,58,663 /17 * 2) }

Cost incurred - $ 17,500  

Revised cost - $ 2,45,732

Amortization for 2011 - $ 14,454

   Carrying value as on 2011 : $ 2,31,277

d) As on dec 31st 2013 :

Carrying value as on 1st jan 2013 - $ 2,17,672 { 2,31,277 - (2,31,277 /17 ) }

cost incurred - 11,240

Revised cost - $ 2,28,912

Amortization - $ 38,152

Carrying value : $ 1,90,760


Related Solutions

Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date: Activity: Cost: 2001-2002 Research conducted to develop precipitator P384,000 Jan 2003...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes that it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells one of its patents. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011 − 2012 Research conducted to develop...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2008–2009 Research conducted to develop precipitator $382,000 Jan. 2010...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...
Fields Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011–2012 Research conducted to develop precipitator $384,000 Jan. 2013...
Concord Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of...
Concord Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution. Concord does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Concord patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows. Date Activity Cost 2011–2012 Research conducted to develop precipitator $382,000 Jan. 2013...
1) The legal costs associated with filing a patent for a new model of scooter at...
1) The legal costs associated with filing a patent for a new model of scooter at a toy manufacturer is an example of which type of​ activity? A. ​Unit-level B. Batch-level C. ​Product-level D. Facility-level 2) Which of the following reasons would indicate that a company should consider using departmental overhead rates rather than using a single plantwide overhead​ rate? A. Each department spends different amounts on manufacturing overhead. B. Each department incurs different types of manufacturing overhead. C. Each...
whargo company purchased a valuable technology patent on January 1, 2020 for $425,000. The patent has...
whargo company purchased a valuable technology patent on January 1, 2020 for $425,000. The patent has a useful life of 21 years and legal life of 17 years. Journalize: (a) the purchese of the parent for cash on January 1, 2020 (b) Amortization of the patent on december 31, 2020
Is studying the history of economic thought valuable? If so explain why, if not explain why...
Is studying the history of economic thought valuable? If so explain why, if not explain why not. In particular can studying the HET make people better economists or does it just make them better-read economists? explain in details
Is there a time cost associated with haggling? A person's time becomes more valuable due to...
Is there a time cost associated with haggling? A person's time becomes more valuable due to the higher income earned, is there less haggling over price?
Firm A produces a product in high demand and it holds the sole legal authority to produce from patent protection.
Firm A produces a product in high demand and it holds the sole legal authority to produce from patent protection. The demand function is Qd=1,000,000-10P and the market supply curve is Qs=25P-125,000. The total cost function is C=$1,000,000,000+$5000Qs. Derived from C, we the marginal cost of the firm, MC=$5,000. a. What would be the equilibrium quantity and price if this were a perfectly competitive market? Demonstrate graphically the consumer surplus, producer surplus b. Now assume there is one firm (Firm...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT