Question

In: Operations Management

Case 5.1 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012)--- please explain about this case in...

Case 5.1 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012)--- please explain about this case in 500 words?

Refernce -- https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-393

Solutions

Expert Solution

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 is considered as a landmark for the decision of the Supreme Court wherein the power of the congress was upheld for enacting the patient protection and affordable care act provisions. This is also known as Obamacare and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act(HCERA). The act showed important changes that were made to the health care system in America. This had lot of debate and division related to the political party lines. There were several parties which also included National Federation of Independent Business and there was claim that there was unconstitutional aspect attached to reforming law. Certiorari was granted to the case and the arguments were about 5½ hours. This was related to the concerns of the constitutionality of the mandate of individual and unconstitutional provisions and its severity. There were many issues that were fragmented in this case. The opinion of the court was written for injunction act and the taxing power of the congress. There was issue declared stating that the anti injunction act does not preclude the individual mandate related to the litigation for the mandate. The reason is because of the labeling of ACA for the individual mandate as penalty and not tax. This restricts it from getting treated as the tax under the act of anti injunction


Related Solutions

Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford...
Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford Motor Co.
Business law, please help for this court case below. Gaskell v. Univ. of Kentucky
Business law, please help for this court case below. Gaskell v. Univ. of Kentucky
Case 17.4: Consumer Federation of America v. Department of Agriculture, 455 F.3d 283 (D.C. Cir. 2006)...
Case 17.4: Consumer Federation of America v. Department of Agriculture, 455 F.3d 283 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (p. 580) Facts: In February 2001, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published notice of a proposed rule regulating exposure to Listeria, a dangerous, food-borne bacterium that can be found in ready-to-eat meat and poultry. USDA later issued an interim final rule that Consumer Federation of America (CFA) regarded as significantly weaker than the originally proposed rule. Seeking to learn whether USDA officials...
According to the National Institutes of Health (2015) in 2012, it was reported that about 45...
According to the National Institutes of Health (2015) in 2012, it was reported that about 45 million American adults (nearly 20% of adult population) were diagnosed with a mental illness with the overall rate possibly being higher due to individuals not being diagnosed. Choose a specific mental illness and briefly describe the condition, prevalence, cause, common treatments and possible consequences. The bigger picture- how is the healthcare system and society doing regarding diagnosis, treatment, and acceptance of mental illness of...
Case brief for Business Law Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922) FACT:?...
Case brief for Business Law Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922) FACT:? ISSUE? RULE OF LAW? COURT'S REASONING ? CONCLUSION? Source?
In two pages maximum, please discuss (1) what this case (Montgomery v Lousiana) was about (the...
In two pages maximum, please discuss (1) what this case (Montgomery v Lousiana) was about (the issues the US Supreme Court was asked to consider), (2) who supports the ban on mandatory life-without-parole sentences on juveniles and why, (3) who opposes the ban on mandatory life-without-parole (in other words, wants to be able to sentence juveniles to mandatory life-without-parole) and why, (4) where do you stand regarding this issue/court case and why?
Revenue Management saves the business: the case of the National Car Rental The story:​ National Rental...
Revenue Management saves the business: the case of the National Car Rental The story:​ National Rental Car faced disastrous possibilities. In 1993, General Motors had considered liquidating or selling the unprofitable business. National and their 7500 employees had just one chance. They had to make the business profitable and prove that the car rental business was worth saving. National quickly brought in the help of specialists to assess the situation, understand the business and quantify revenue potential. Using the information...
National Business Machine Co. (NBM) has $5.1 million of extra cash after taxes have been paid....
National Business Machine Co. (NBM) has $5.1 million of extra cash after taxes have been paid. NBM has two choices to make use of this cash. One alternative is to invest the cash in financial assets. The resulting investment income will be paid out as a special dividend at the end of three years. In this case, the firm can invest in either Treasury bills yielding 2.9 percent or a 5.3 percent preferred stock. IRS regulations allow the company to...
National Business Machine Co. (NBM) has $5.1 million of extra cash after taxes have been paid....
National Business Machine Co. (NBM) has $5.1 million of extra cash after taxes have been paid. NBM has two choices to make use of this cash. One alternative is to invest the cash in financial assets. The resulting investment income will be paid out as a special dividend at the end of three years. In this case, the firm can invest in either Treasury bills yielding 2.9 percent or a 5.3 percent preferred stock. IRS regulations allow the company to...
Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide...
Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide the following: What are the facts of this case? What is the legal question being asked? What was the significant legal issue resolved?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT