Question

In: Nursing

Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide...

Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide the following: What are the facts of this case? What is the legal question being asked? What was the significant legal issue resolved?

Solutions

Expert Solution

#. Insignia vs. LaBella case :-

On January 19, 1981, an individual named Morton Canton admitted Mildred Insinga, who was 68 years old at the time, to Biscayne, a hospital in North Miami, Florida. At that time, Canton was masquerading as a medical doctor under the name of "Dr. Michelle LaBella." Mrs. Insinga died on February 6, 1981 while a patient in the hospital. It was subsequently discovered that Canton was not a medical doctor, but rather, a fugitive from justice in Canada where he was under indictment for the manufacture and sale of illegal drugs. Canton had fraudulently obtained a medical license from the State of Florida and staff privileges at Biscayne using the name of Dr. LaBella, a deceased Italian physician. Insinga filed a wrongful death action against several defendants in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida. The amended complaint contained charges against (1) Dr. LaBella, a/k/a Canton, for negligence in failing to diagnose and properly treat Mrs. Insinga; (2) the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Florida ("Board"), for negligence in licensing Canton/LaBella; (3) the Department of Professional Regulation of the State of Florida ("Department"), for negligence in issuing a license to Canton/LaBella; and (4) Humana, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Kentucky, for negligence in granting Canton/LaBella medical staff privileges.

Facts :-

masquerading as a physician

corporate negligence of hospital board's implied duty to patients to select competent staff

wrongful death of a woman


Related Solutions

Please brief the case for Scott v. Sandford. A Partial brief meaning focusing on the facts...
Please brief the case for Scott v. Sandford. A Partial brief meaning focusing on the facts and issues of the case
Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford...
Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford Motor Co.
Please search the 1891 New York case Hamer v. Sidway After searching the case please provide...
Please search the 1891 New York case Hamer v. Sidway After searching the case please provide the following: 1) Legal Citation 2) What is the main issue of the case? 3) What is the rule the judge used in the case? 4) How did the judge use the rule in this case to come to the proper verdict (decision)? In other words, the judge's analysis. 5) What was the final decision of the judge? 6) Why is this topic important...
Write a Case Brief on the case Pasquarella v. 1525 WIlliam St.
Write a Case Brief on the case Pasquarella v. 1525 WIlliam St.
Business law, please help for this court case below. Gaskell v. Univ. of Kentucky
Business law, please help for this court case below. Gaskell v. Univ. of Kentucky
Brief case of New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira,
Brief case of New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira,
brief IRAC of case 40.1 Oliveira v. Sugarman
brief IRAC of case 40.1 Oliveira v. Sugarman
Case brief for Business Law Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922) FACT:?...
Case brief for Business Law Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922) FACT:? ISSUE? RULE OF LAW? COURT'S REASONING ? CONCLUSION? Source?
Please answers the below True/False and Multiple choice questions from Business Law. (Please provide a brief...
Please answers the below True/False and Multiple choice questions from Business Law. (Please provide a brief explanation to answers if possible) Chapter: Agency Relationships 1. “By definition, independent contractors are not employees.” True/False 2.   John lies and tells Bill that he, John, is Mike's agent, when he is not. Bill enters into a contract with John for the benefit of Mike. Mike can still ratify the contract John entered into for him. True/False 3. In #2 above, when John lied,...
Please answers the below True/False and Multiple choice questions from Business Law. (Please provide a brief...
Please answers the below True/False and Multiple choice questions from Business Law. (Please provide a brief explanation to answers if possible) Chapter: Business Organizations 1.   The business judgment rule does not immunize members of boards of directors from liability to stockholders that come about from the bad business decisions of those directors. True/False 2. Corporations are not required to incorporate under the law of the state where their corporate headquarters is located. True/False 3. The portion of a corporation’s profits...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT