Question

In: Finance

Case Problem 13.1 Assessing the Stalchecks’s Portfolio Performance LG3 LG4 Mary and Nick Stalcheck have an...

Case Problem 13.1 Assessing the Stalchecks’s Portfolio Performance LG3 LG4 Mary and Nick Stalcheck have an investment portfolio containing 4 investments. It was developed to provide them with a balance between current income and capital appreciation. Rather than acquire mutual fund shares or diversify within a given class of investments, they developed their portfolio with the idea of diversifying across various asset classes. The portfolio currently contains common stock, industrial bonds, mutual fund shares, and options. They acquired each of these investments during the past 3 years, and they plan to purchase other investments sometime in the future. Currently, the Stalchecks are interested in measuring the return on their investment and assessing how well they have done relative to the market. They hope that the return earned over the past calendar year is in excess of what they would have earned by investing in a portfolio consisting of the S&P 500 Stock Composite Index. Their research has indicated that the risk-free rate was 7.2% and that the (before-tax) return on the S&P 500 portfolio was 10.1% during the past year. With the aid of a friend, they have been able to estimate the beta of their portfolio, which was 1.20. In their analysis, they have planned to ignore taxes because they feel their earnings have been adequately sheltered. Because they did not make any portfolio transactions during the past year, all of the Stalchecks’s investments have been held more than 12 months, and they would have to consider only unrealized capital gains, if any. To make the necessary calculations, the Stalchecks have gathered the following information on each investment in their portfolio. Common stock. They own 400 shares of KJ Enterprises common stock. KJ is a diversified manufacturer of metal pipe and is known for its unbroken stream of dividends. Over the past few years, it has entered new markets and, as a result, has offered moderate capital appreciation potential. Its share price has risen from $17.25 at the start of the last calendar year to $18.75 at the end of the year. During the year, quarterly cash dividends of $0.20, $0.20, $0.25, and $0.25 were paid. Industrial bonds. The Stalchecks own 8 Cal Industries bonds. The bonds have a $1,000 par value, have a 9.250% coupon, and are due in 2024. They are A-rated by Moody’s. The bonds were quoted at 97.000 at the beginning of the year and ended the calendar year at 96.375%. Mutual fund. The Stalchecks hold 500 shares in the Holt Fund, a balanced, no-load mutual fund. The dividend distributions on the fund during the year consisted of $0.60 in investment income and $0.50 in capital gains. The fund’s NAV at the beginning of the calendar year was $19.45, and it ended the year at $20.02. Options. The Stalchecks own 100 options contracts on the stock of a company they follow. The value of these contracts totaled $26,000 at the beginning of the calendar year. At year-end the total value of the options contracts was $29,000. Questions a.   Calculate the holding period return on a before-tax basis for each of these 4 investments. b.   Assuming that the Stalchecks’s ordinary income is currently being taxed at a combined (federal and state) tax rate of 38% and that they would pay a 15% capital gains tax on dividends and capital gains for holding periods longer than 12 months, determine the after-tax HPR for each of their 4 investments. c.   Recognizing that all gains on the Stalchecks’s investments were unrealized, calculate the before-tax portfolio HPR for their 4-investment portfolio during the past calendar year. Evaluate this return relative to its current income and capital gain components. d.   Use the HPR calculated in question c to compute Jensen’s measure (Jensen’s alpha). Use that measure to analyze the performance of the Stalchecks’s portfolio on a risk-adjusted, market-adjusted basis. Comment on your finding. Is it reasonable to use Jensen’s measure to evaluate a 4-investment portfolio? Why or why not? e.   On the basis of your analysis in questions a, c, and d, what, if any, recommendations might you offer the Stalchecks relative to the revision of their portfolio? Explain your recommendations

Show all calculations

Solutions

Expert Solution

Q.a. Holding period return on a before tax basis


Holding period return = (Total appreciation in value over the year) / (Total value at the start of the year)


For common stock=((18.75-17.25)+.20+.20+.25+.25)/17.25=13.91%
Here, (stock price appreciation + the dividends)/Stock price at the start of the year


For industrial bonds=((1000*(96.375%)-970)+1000*9.250%)/970=8.89%
Here, (year end coupon + Bond price at year end) / Bond price at start of the year


For mutual fund=((20.02-19.45)+0.60+0.50)/19.45 = 8.59%
Here, (Capital gain + dividend distributions) / Value using NAV at start of the year


For options=(29000-26000) / 26000=11.54%
Here, (Appreciation of options contract during the year) / Value of options contract at start of the year


Q.b. After-tax HPR


Here, the only difference is that the tax of 15% is deducted before calculating the holding period return.


For common stock=((18.75-17.25)*(1-(15%)) +(.20+.20+.25+.25)*(1-(15%))) / 17.25 = 11.83%
For industrial bonds = ((1000*(96.375%)-970)*(1-(15%)) + (1,000*(9.25%))*(1-(35%)))/970 = 5.65%
For mutual fund = ((20.02-19.45)*(1-(15%)) + 0.60*(1-(35%))+0.50*(1-(15%)))/19.45 = 6.68%
For options= (29000-26000)*(1-(15%)) / 26000 = 9.81%


Q.c. Before-tax portfolio HPR and evaluating the return relative to its current income and capital gain component


First, we calculate the total value of the portfolio at the beginning
Common stock = 400*17.25=6900
Industrial bonds = 97%*1000*8=7760
Mutual funds = 500*19.45=9725
Options = 26000
Hence, the portfolio value at the beginning = 6900+7760+9725+26000 = 50385


Hence the weight assigned for the common stock = 6900/50385 = 13.69%
Hence the weight assigned for industrial bonds =7760/50385 =15.40%
Hence the weight assigned for Mutual funds =9725/50385 =19.30%
Hence the weight assigned for Options =26000/50385 =51.60%


Before tax portfolio Holding Period Return = (13.91%*13.69%) + (8.89%*15.40%) + (8.59%*19.30%) + (11.54%*51.60%) =12.79%


For calculation of current income return, current income
Of common stock =(0.20+0.20+0.25+0.25)*400=360
Of industrial bonds =1000*9.25%*8 =740
Of mutual fund =0.60*500 =300
Of options = 0


Current income return =(360+740+300)/50385=1400/50385 = 2.78%


For calculation of capital gains income return, capital income
Of common stock = (18.75-17.25)*400=600
Of industrial bonds = (1000*96.375%-970)*8= -50
Of mutual fund = (20.02-19.45)*500=285
Of options = 3000
Capital gains return = (3000 +285+ 600-50)/50385 = 3835 /50385= 7.61%


Hence, the capital gains form a higher portion out of the before-tax total holding period returns of the portfolio


Q.d.
Jensen’s alpha =(Before tax portfolio Holding Period Return)- (Risk-free rate) – (Beta*(Market return S&P500-Risk-free rate))
Jensens alpha = 12.79% - 7.2% - (1.20*(10.1% -7.2%))= 9.07%


The alpha has been generated indicates that the portfolio has been giving better return than the market ( S&P500).
Yes, Jensen’s alpha can be used to evaluate a portfolio since it the overall objective is to achieve a return greater than the market return. However, Jensen’s alpha doesn’t take into account the portfolio volatility into account.


Q.e.
Since the common stock is the one which has the highest HPR, and also carry less weight in the portfolio, its weight can be increases.
Also, the weight for options in the portfolio is the highest, which can be reduced to a certain extent
.



Related Solutions

ane has a portfolio of 20 average stocks, and Nick has a portfolio of 2 average...
ane has a portfolio of 20 average stocks, and Nick has a portfolio of 2 average stocks. Assuming the market is in equilibrium, which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. Jane's portfolio will have less diversifiable risk and also less market risk than Nick's portfolio. b. The required return on Jane's portfolio will be lower than that on Nick's portfolio because Jane's portfolio will have less total risk. c. Nick's portfolio will have more diversifiable risk, the same market...
13.1 Discuss the similarities and differences in managing a portfolio of equity investments and credit assets.
13.1 Discuss the similarities and differences in managing a portfolio of equity investments and credit assets.
1. why is assessing job performance necessary?
1. why is assessing job performance necessary?2. why is it important to document routine performance feedback provided to employees?3. describe a formal method for assessing job performance?
What all is involved in assessing the performance of a firm? What specific aspects of performance...
What all is involved in assessing the performance of a firm? What specific aspects of performance are important? Within this process, what role does financial analysis play? What are some of the important financial ratios that should be looked at and what things might these reveal about the firm?
Nick Fitzgerald holds a​ well-diversified portfolio of​ high-quality, large-cap stocks. The current value of​ Fitzgerald's portfolio...
Nick Fitzgerald holds a​ well-diversified portfolio of​ high-quality, large-cap stocks. The current value of​ Fitzgerald's portfolio is $ 745,000​, but he is concerned that the market is heading for a big fall​ (perhaps as much as​ 20%) over the next three to six months. He​ doesn't want to sell any of his stocks because he feels they all have good​ long-term potential and should perform nicely once stock prices have bottomed out. As a​ result, he's thinking about using index...
CASE 13.1 Wash & Dry, lnc. Wash & Dry (WD) is a small manufacturing company with...
CASE 13.1 Wash & Dry, lnc. Wash & Dry (WD) is a small manufacturing company with annual revenues for 2015 reaching $10 million. Located in Bellefonte, PA, WD produces various types of laundry and personal soaps as well as an array of paper products, such as paper towels and napkins. The unique nature of WDs products have allowed it to grow from a start-up in 2010 with revenues of $1 million to where it is today. WDs products are totally...
Research the 1990s case of Nick Leeson and Barings Bank. How is this an example of...
Research the 1990s case of Nick Leeson and Barings Bank. How is this an example of the principal-agent problem? Be specific, identifying both the agent and the principal. How could Barings Bank have prevented such a disaster?
Explain how foreign portfolio flows affect stock market performance in Kenya (Use a case study of...
Explain how foreign portfolio flows affect stock market performance in Kenya (Use a case study of Nairobi securities exchange)
A school principal is interested in assessing the performance of her students on the Totally Oppressive...
A school principal is interested in assessing the performance of her students on the Totally Oppressive Standardized test (TOST). She selects a simple random sample of 16 of her students and finds the following set of test scores: 6 5 6 12 5 10 11 13 12 10 9 20 23 20 28 18 Assume that the sample is drawn from a population with a standard deviation σ = 7.20. a. (1 point) What is the mean test score for...
Problem 3 Jimmy and Mary Sue, ages 28 and 27, respectively, are married and have a...
Problem 3 Jimmy and Mary Sue, ages 28 and 27, respectively, are married and have a net worth of $100,000. They both work, Jimmy has a 2010 Chevy truck, and Mary Sue has a 2012 Toyota Corolla. They also own a 1966 Indian motorcycle. They rent an apartment and have the following automobile and renter’s insurance policies: Renters Insurance: • HO-4 renter’s policy without endorsements • Content Coverage: $25,000; Liability: $100,000 Automobile Insurance: Both Car and Truck Type PAP Bodily...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT