In: Finance
The Wagner Company currently uses an injection-molding machine that was purchased 2 years ago. This machine is being depreciated on a straight-line basis, and it has 6-years of remaining life. Its current book value is $2,100, and it can be sold for $2,500 at this time. Thus, the annual depreciation expense is $350 [($2,100/6) = $350 per year]. If the old machine is not replaced, it can be sold for $500 at the end of its useful life.
Wagner is offered a replacement machine that has a cost of $8,000, an estimated useful life of 6 years, and an estimated salvage value of $800. This machine falls into the MACRS 5-year class, so the applicable depreciation rates are 20%, 32%, 19%, 12%, 11%, and 6%. The replacement machine would permit an output expansion, so sales would rise by $2,000 per year. Even so, the new machine’s much greater efficiency would reduce operating expenses by $3,000 per year. The new machine would require that inventories be increased by $4,000, but accounts payable would simultaneously increase by $1,000. Wagner’s marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 40%, and its WACC is 15%.
Should The Wagner Company replace the old machine? Justify your answer.
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Incremental sales | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | $ 2,000 | |
Savings in operating cost | $ 3,000 | $ 3,000 | $ 3,000 | $ 3,000 | $ 3,000 | $ 3,000 | |
Incremental depreciation: | |||||||
Depreciation on new machine | $ 1,600 | $ 2,560 | $ 1,520 | $ 960 | $ 880 | $ 640 | |
Depreciation on old machine | $ 350 | $ 350 | $ 350 | $ 350 | $ 350 | $ 350 | |
Incremental depreciation | $ 1,250 | $ 2,210 | $ 1,170 | $ 610 | $ 530 | $ 290 | |
Incremental NOI | $ 3,750 | $ 2,790 | $ 3,830 | $ 4,390 | $ 4,470 | $ 4,710 | |
Tax at 40% | $ 1,500 | $ 1,116 | $ 1,532 | $ 1,756 | $ 1,788 | $ 1,884 | |
NOPAT | $ 2,250 | $ 1,674 | $ 2,298 | $ 2,634 | $ 2,682 | $ 2,826 | |
Add: Incremental depreciation | $ 1,250 | $ 2,210 | $ 1,170 | $ 610 | $ 530 | $ 290 | |
Incremental OCF | $ 3,500 | $ 3,884 | $ 3,468 | $ 3,244 | $ 3,212 | $ 3,116 | |
Capital expenditure | $ 8,000 | ||||||
Less: After tax sale value of old machine = 2500-(2500-2100)*40% = | $ 2,340 | ||||||
Net cost of machine | $ 5,660 | ||||||
Change in NWC = 4000-1000 = | $ 3,000 | $ -3,000 | |||||
Incremental terminal cash flows from sale of machinery: | |||||||
After tax sale of value of new machinery = 800*60% = | $ 480 | ||||||
Less: After tax sale of value of old machinery = 500*60% = | $ 300 | ||||||
Incremental after tax sale value | $ 180 | ||||||
FCF | $ -8,660 | $ 3,500 | $ 3,884 | $ 3,468 | $ 3,244 | $ 3,212 | $ 6,296 |
PVIF at 15% [PVIF = 1/1.15^n] | 1 | 0.86957 | 0.75614 | 0.65752 | 0.57175 | 0.49718 | 0.43233 |
PV at 15% | $ -8,660 | $ 3,043 | $ 2,937 | $ 2,280 | $ 1,855 | $ 1,597 | $ 2,722 |
NPV | $ 5,774 | ||||||
As the NPV of the replacement project is positive, the replacement can be made. |