Identify the pro and contrast of the colonization for the Latin America indigenous

Expert Solution

There are various pros and contrast of the colonisation for the Latin America indigenous.

Pros are as following:

Because of colonisation, trade and development took place.
Socially people became more civilized and developed.
They learned many ways of utilising resources properly. Because of colonisation, Native Americans started using products manufactured in Europe like kettles, knives, copper vessels, guns, many other daily life usable accessories.
They started using hairs (woollen) of ships and other animals on large scale i.e. at industrial level.
They learned more advanced and efficient ways of farming and using cows, buffaloes, pigs for multipurpose.
SociallyLatin Americans became more organised and well behaved.
Private ownership started, business mentality was developed among people.
Many modern medicines and treatments for various diseases were developed and discovered.
There was overall social, economic and cultural-revolution when colonisation took place in Latin America.

If we talk about contrast or negative effects of Colonisation then we can describe them as following.

Europeans encouraged slavery. They brought slaves from Africa to America for more faster industrial and agricultural production.
They exploited natural resources at maximum level and in greediest way.
They ruined the traditional methods of farming, well established social skeleton of Native Latin Americans.
They interfered in every aspect of social, cultural and traditional aspects of life of natives.
They changed the natural living style of original native people.
In the name of modernisation, they brought unemployment to the natives as the most of tasks were being done by machines or by slaves brought from Africa.
They introduced many diseases because of slaves.
They cut many plants and spoiled rivers because of large scale industrialisation

Hayet Jeridi answered 1 year ago

Contrast the economic experience of the HPAE with the experience in Latin America, especially with regard...

Contrast the economic experience of the HPAE with the experience in Latin America, especially with regard to the 1980s and in terms of weathering financial crises.

Summary on Latin America Crises

What is the meaning of privatization and neoliberalism in Latin America

Why was Latin America so inflation prone?

is the United States a friend or foe to Latin America? explain

What factors have shaped the growth patterns of Latin America?

The indigenous inhabitants of North America, before the arrival of Europeans and subsequently of Africans, left...

The indigenous inhabitants of North America, before the arrival of Europeans and subsequently of Africans, left behind an archaeological record that indicates that, north of the central Mexican valley, populations were relatively small, isolated, and broadly reliant on the hunter-gatherer mode of production with supplementary horticulture. What prevented the pre-contact economies of North America's peoples from developing as in Eurasia? A Until the importation of horses, cattle, swine, sheep, and goats, North America lacked domesticated animals, because there simply were...

In much of Asia and Latin America, companies that are parts of family groups comprise a...

In much of Asia and Latin America, companies that are parts of family groups comprise a large percentage of publicly traded companies. From a corporate governance standpoint, which of the following would concern you the most at these companies? A. They will make decisions that are in the best interests of the family group, rather than in the best interests of the company B. They will pay out too much in dividends. C. They will make decisions that are in...

One of the major problems in Latin America in the 1980s was according to some economists,...

One of the major problems in Latin America in the 1980s was according to some economists, the wager igidity. The wages were not falling down fast enough when economic conditions were demanding such a fall according to those economists. What could be a remedy those economists might have suggested to decrease the wage rigidity?

Why did ISI succeed in east Asia and fail in Latin America?

Question