Question

Now that you have your data set for your final study mostly analyzed (it is due on Monday!), you thought the data analysis was over, right? Not so fast. I want you to run one more analysis, and this is going to be a tough one. Rather than a 2 X 2 ANOVA, I want you to run a 2 X 2 X 2 ANOVA. That is, I want you to include participant gender as a third independent variable. The good news here is that the analysis is almost identical to the 2 X 2 ANOVAs you already did for Paper IV. With a 2 X 2 X 2 ANOVA, though, simply pull gender over as another “fixed factor” in your design and then run the univariate ANOVA. In your discussion, tell me what (if anything) was significant in the analysis. Think about this as an A X B X C design. There are three different independent variables, all with two levels, so there should be three main effects (one for A, one for B, and one for C). There should be three 2 X 2 interactions (AB, AC, and BC). There should be one possible three way interaction (ABC).

All I need you to tell me is which (if any) main effects are significant, which (if any) two way interactions are significant), and if the three way interaction is significant. I don’t need to see the statistics, means, standard deviations, or simple effects tests: just tell me which tests are significant! Then try to interpret it for me by looking at the means. Did differences seem to emerge for the DVs? Work with your group on this interpretation

( I don't need a long explanation, please keep it brief and to the point )

Answer 1

Since you have your informational index for your last investigation for the most part dissected (it was expected on Monday!), you thought the information examination was finished, isn't that so? One moment. I need you to run one more examination, and this will be an extreme one. As opposed to a 2 X 2 ANOVA, I need you to run a 2 X 2 X 2 ANOVA. That is, I need you to incorporate member sexual orientation as a third free factor. The uplifting news here is that the investigation is practically indistinguishable from the 2 X 2 ANOVAs you previously accomplished for Paper IV. With a 2 X 2 X 2 ANOVA, however, just force sex over as another "fixed factor" in your plan and afterward run the univariate ANOVA. In your talk, reveal to me imagine a scenario where (anything) was huge in the examination. Consider this an A X B X C plan. There are three diverse free factors, all with two levels, so there ought to be three fundamental impacts (one for A, one for B, and one for C). There ought to be three 2 X 2 communications (AB, AC, and BC). There should be one potential three way cooperation (ABC). All I need you to let me know is which (assuming any) primary impacts are noteworthy, which (assuming any) two way collaborations are huge), and if the three way association is huge. I don't have to see the measurements, implies, standard deviations, or straightforward impacts tests: simply reveal to me which tests are critical! At that point attempt to translate it for me by taking a gander at the methods. Did contrasts appear to rise for the DVs? Work with your gathering on this translation. Ensure every individual in your gathering reacts at any rate twice, however I urge you to react on numerous occasions as you take part in a gathering discourse