In: Statistics and Probability
An investigator in the Statistics Department of a large university is interested in the effect of exercise in maintaining mental ability. She decides to study the faculty members aged 40 to 50 at his university, looking separately at two groups: The ones that exercise regularly, and the ones that don’t. There turn out to be several hundred people in each group, so she takes simple random sample of 25 persons from each group, for detailed study. One of the things she does is to administer an IQ test to the sample people, with the following results:
Regular Exercise:
Sample size: 25
Average score: 130
Standard deviation: 15
No Regular Exercise:
Sample size: 25
Average score: 120
Standard deviation: 15
The investigator concludes that exercise does indeed help to maintain mental ability among the faculty members aged 40 to 50 at his university. Is this conclusion justified? Explain whether you agree with her and show your reasoning mathematically
Result:
n investigator in the Statistics Department of a large university is interested in the effect of exercise in maintaining mental ability. She decides to study the faculty members aged 40 to 50 at his university, looking separately at two groups: The ones that exercise regularly, and the ones that don’t. There turn out to be several hundred people in each group, so she takes simple random sample of 25 persons from each group, for detailed study. One of the things she does is to administer an IQ test to the sample people, with the following results:
Regular Exercise:
Sample size: 25
Average score: 130
Standard deviation: 15
No Regular Exercise:
Sample size: 25
Average score: 120
Standard deviation: 15
The investigator concludes that exercise does indeed help to maintain mental ability among the faculty members aged 40 to 50 at his university. Is this conclusion justified? Explain whether you agree with her and show your reasoning mathematically
Two sample t test used.
Ho: µ1 = µ2 H1: µ1 > µ2
Upper tail test used.
= 2.3570
DF = n1+n2-2 =48
Table value of t with 48 DF at 0.05 level = 1.6772
Rejection Region: Reject Ho if t > 1.6772
Calculated t = 2.3570, falls in the rejection region
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to conclude that exercise does indeed help to maintain mental ability among the faculty members aged 40 to 50 at his university.
Pooled-Variance t Test for the Difference Between Two Means |
|
(assumes equal population variances) |
|
Data |
|
Hypothesized Difference |
0 |
Level of Significance |
0.05 |
Population 1 Sample |
|
Sample Size |
25 |
Sample Mean |
130 |
Sample Standard Deviation |
15 |
Population 2 Sample |
|
Sample Size |
25 |
Sample Mean |
120 |
Sample Standard Deviation |
15 |
Intermediate Calculations |
|
Population 1 Sample Degrees of Freedom |
24 |
Population 2 Sample Degrees of Freedom |
24 |
Total Degrees of Freedom |
48 |
Pooled Variance |
225.0000 |
Standard Error |
4.2426 |
Difference in Sample Means |
10.0000 |
t Test Statistic |
2.3570 |
Upper-Tail Test |
|
Upper Critical Value |
1.6772 |
p-Value |
0.0113 |
Reject the null hypothesis |