Question

In: Operations Management

Security Plus and Stone Quarries entered into a written sales agreement providing that Security would sell...

Security Plus and Stone Quarries entered into a written sales agreement providing that Security would sell and install new security equipment described on an equipment list attached to the contract.  The list included a Sony video cassette recorder (VCR).  When the system was installed, Security installed a used Sharp VCR.  Quarry called Security the day after the installation and complained that the equipment was not a Sony and was used, not new.  Security told Quarry that the equipment was not used and that a Sharp VCR was better than a Sony.  Quarry telephoned Security personnel over a two week period during which they denied that the equipment was used.

After two weeks of calls, Security’s installation manager went to Quarry’s premises to see the equipment and admitted that it was used.  No one from Security advised Quarry in advance that it was installing used equipment temporarily until the right equipment arrived.  Security offered to replace it with a new Sony VCR as soon as one arrived, which would take one or two months.  Quarry asked Security to return its deposit and take the equipment back, but Security refused.  Quarry put all the equipment in boxes and stored it. Security sued Quarry for breach of contract.  Quarry filed a counterclaim, alleging breach of contract.  Security asserted that it had the right to replace the Sharp VCR within the month or two after Quarry rejected it, and thus it was not in breach of the contract.  Discuss whether or not Security is correct

Solutions

Expert Solution

as per the agreement or contract, the Security firm has to fit new VCR machine at the Quarry firm, and it is the part of their agreement. If they were mentioned at the time of contract that the new machine (VCR) must be Sony only, it has to fit the same only. But here it is not happened, first the Security firm installed old VCR and said that, it is a new piece only. It is the first aspect in the breach of contract.

Second, after some time, security firm says that, they are going to be fit a new Sony VCR, till the time continue with the old one. Means, they are indirectly saying that the VCR is useed one, so again it breached the contract twice.

Hence, Quarry called the security people to take back their VCR and revert the money they paid. But they were refused and said something unrelated.

Quarry has complete right to withdraw the VCR and keep it in a box and revert the same to the Security people when they arrived into the firm.

The security is not correct in this case. They started breach of contract first, and later they are raising voice that Quarry is breached the contract. It is not correct and Quarry will be win the case in court of law.


Related Solutions

Transaction 2 TeleCo, a customer of CoAx, entered into a binding written agreement to purchase 1,500...
Transaction 2 TeleCo, a customer of CoAx, entered into a binding written agreement to purchase 1,500 feet of fiber-optical cable for $3 per foot. TeleCo’s shipping terms are freight on board (FOB) shipping point. CoAx collected payment before the order was shipped. Title transfers upon delivery to the carrier, and TeleCo will insure the product while it is in transit. Instead of using a third-party shipper such as FedEx and UPS, CoAx has decided to use its own logistics subsidiary,...
Implied Warranty of Habitability Sharon Love entered into a written lease agreement with Monarch Apartments (Monarch)...
Implied Warranty of Habitability Sharon Love entered into a written lease agreement with Monarch Apartments (Monarch) for apartment 4 at 441 Winfield in Topeka, Kansas. Shortly after moving in, she experienced serious problems with termites. Her walls swelled, clouds of dirt came out of the walls, and when she checked on her children one night, she saw termites flying around the room. She complained to Monarch, which arranged for the apartment to be fumigated. When the termite problem persisted, Monarch...
1. On September 17, 2021, Ziltech, Inc., entered into an agreement to sell one of its...
1. On September 17, 2021, Ziltech, Inc., entered into an agreement to sell one of its divisions that qualifies as a component of the entity according to generally accepted accounting principles. By December 31, 2021, the company’s fiscal year-end, the division had not yet been sold, but was considered held for sale. The net fair value (fair value minus costs to sell) of the division’s assets at the end of the year was $16 million. The pretax income from operations...
Homeowner Ann Jameson entered into a 90-day exclusive right to sell listing agreement with a real...
Homeowner Ann Jameson entered into a 90-day exclusive right to sell listing agreement with a real estate broker, Bill Boor. One week later, Jameson sold the house to her neighbor, Jerry Mateo, who learned that the property was for sale when he saw the "for sale" sign in Jameson's yard. Boor contends that he is entitled to a commission on the sale. Is Boor entitled to a commission? Why or why not?
Wolverine Sales and Service entered into a lease agreement to lease a fleet of five vehicles...
Wolverine Sales and Service entered into a lease agreement to lease a fleet of five vehicles from Boilermaker Motors. The term of the lease is five years and Wolverine makes annual payments of $15,000 per year beginning on January 1, 2017 (and every December 31 through December 31, 2020). January 1, 2017 is also the lease commencement date. Wolverine does not guarantee any residual value in the lease agreement. Wolverine received $6,000 on 1/1/17 as an incentive to sign the...
Buyer and Seller entered into a written agreement for Buyer to purchase real property, which property included a home, from Seller.
 Buyer and Seller entered into a written agreement for Buyer to purchase real property, which property included a home, from Seller. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the risk of loss "shall remain with Seller until delivery of title." The purchase agreement was entered into on May 15 and called for closing on June 1, though the agreement did not say that time was of the essence. Seller chose this date for closing, in part, because that was the...
Jefferson entered into a contract with Adams whereby Adams would sell goods produced by Jefferson's company....
Jefferson entered into a contract with Adams whereby Adams would sell goods produced by Jefferson's company. Adams was to be paid a commission for each sale he made, and the agreement was to last from January 1 to June 30. Adams' work resulted in significant sale for the company. In early June, he was on the verge of closing an extremely large and lucrative contract when Jefferson ,suddenly and without notice, revoked Adams’ authority to sell. Is Adams able to...
On September 17, 2021, Ziltech, Inc., entered into an agreement to sell one of its divisions that qualifies as a component of the entity according to generally accepted accounting principles
On September 17, 2021, Ziltech, Inc., entered into an agreement to sell one of its divisions that qualifies as a component of the entity according to generally accepted accounting principles. By December 31, 2021, the company’s fiscal year-end, the division had not yet been sold, but was considered held for sale. The net fair value (fair value minus costs to sell) of the division’s assets at the end of the year was $11 million. The pretax income from operations of...
You are on the town financial committee. Would you propose sales tax, social security tax of...
You are on the town financial committee. Would you propose sales tax, social security tax of payroll or progressive tax? Explain. a. Suppose you are asked to serve on your state commission to revise the tax system of the state. If you had to choose among a social security type of payroll tax, a progressive income tax, a property tax, or a sales tax, which one would you choose? Why?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT