There are a few reasons why pension accounting has less emphasis
in foreign countries than it does in the US. One of these
fundamental reasons is that pensions are much less common outside
of the US and therefore the currency volume and significant impact
on companies is less in foreign accounting. Some differences
between US GAAP accounting and IFRS accounting for pensions are
:
- Under FAS 158, valuations require the use of a qualified
actuary. Under IAS 19, the use of an actuary is only recommended,
not required.
- Under FAS 158, the discount rate used is the rate at which
obligation could be effectively settled, generally current rates of
return on high-quality fixed income investments with maturities
matching duration of benefits obligation. Under IAS 19 the rate
used is current rates of return on high-quality corporate bonds
with maturities consistent with the duration of benefit
obligations.
- Under FAS 158, the rate of return on plan assets is the
expected long term rates over life of the obligation. Under IAS 19,
the rate is based on current market expectations over the life of
obligation.
- Cost recognized under FAS 158 and IAS 19 is calculated almost
exactly the same way. The only difference is that under FAS 106 you
can add or subtract temporary deviations from plans.