In: Chemistry
Positive Terminal |
Negative Terminal Copper |
Negative Terminal Magnesium |
Negative Terminal Iron |
Negative Terminal Aluminum |
Negative Terminal Zinc |
Copper |
XXXXXXXX |
1.528 V |
0.015 V |
0.012 V |
-0.006 V |
Magnesium |
0.012 V |
XXXXXXXX |
-0.003 V |
-0.003 V |
-0.007 V |
Iron |
-0.350 V |
1.120 V |
XXXXXXXX |
0.062 V |
0.594 V |
Aluminum |
-0.753 V |
0.713 V |
-0.358 V |
XXXXXXXX |
-0.009 V |
Zinc |
-1.001 V |
0.006 V |
0.007 V |
0.022 V |
XXXXXXXX |
Activity Series:
Metal |
Reduction Potential |
|
Lowest Reduction Potential: 1 |
Magnesium |
-1.528 V |
2 |
Iron |
-0.015 V |
3 |
Aluminum |
-0.012 V |
4 |
Copper |
0.000 V |
Highest Reduction Potential: 5 |
Zinc |
0.006 |
Question: Does your activity series agree with published data? If there are differences, what are they? What factors can cause a difference between experimental and reported values?
Table 2:
EoMg2+/Mg = -1.528 V
EoFe2+/Fe = -0.015 V
EoAl3+/Al = -0.012 V
EoCu2+/Cu = 0.000 V
EoZn2+/Zn = 0.006 V
Table 1:
2. a) Magnesium is positive terminal (i.e. cathode) and copper is negative terminal (i.e. anode)
EoMg2+/Mg//Cu/Cu2+ = 0.012 V
The experimental value = -1.528 - 0.000, i.e. -1.528 V
The difference = 0.012-(-1.528), i.e. 1.54 V
2. c) Magnesium is positive terminal (i.e. cathode) and iron is negative terminal (i.e. anode)
EoMg2+/Mg//Fe/Fe2+ = -0.003 V
The experimental value = -1.528 + 0.015, i.e. -1.513 V
The difference = -0.003-(-1.513), i.e. 1.51 V
2. d) Magnesium is positive terminal (i.e. cathode) and aluminium is negative terminal (i.e. anode)
EoMg2+/Mg//Al/Al3+ = -0.003 V
The experimental value = -1.528 + 0.012, i.e. -1.516 V
The difference = -0.003-(-1.516), i.e. 1.513 V
2. e) Magnesium is positive terminal (i.e. cathode) and zinc is negative terminal (i.e. anode)
EoMg2+/Mg//Zn/Zn2+ = -0.007 V
The experimental value = -1.528 - 0.006, i.e. -1.534 V
The difference = -0.007-(-1.534), i.e. 1.527 V
Similarly, you can calculate the differences for the remaining cases. All the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here, the activity series (table 2) doesn't agree with the published data (table 1).
The factors causing a difference between experimental and reported values could be the dryness of electrodes, i.e. if the electrodes are completely dry, then you will get the accurate value; otherwise (if wet), the experimental values will not match with the reported values.