To answer your first question, let’s start with the basic
assumptions of Kohler’s research:
- Commonly confused with heuristics, insight learning is, in
short, realizing a new behavior to solve a problem, whereas
heuristics is an experiment based technique for problem-solving,
learning a discovery, which may not always lead o optimum
solution
- Insight learning was never about trial and error. It is learned
through cognitive processes and interactions with the outside
world.
- Kohler’s research was conducted on a chimp, which was named
Sultan, on which he conducted the empirical study of insight
learning.
- In human beings, insight learning usually occurs when the
solution of the problem suddenly occurs, irrespective of what
progress was made but, in this case, the study on sultan was made
with the banana kept out of the cage, and when 1 sticks were kept
inside the cage for Sultan to get the banana.
- This theory contradicts behaviorism, stating facts on the
empirical study of sultan suggesting learning doesn’t necessarily
have to be achieved by conditioning, but can also be achieved by
cognitive processes, which is intangible.
- There might not necessarily be negative reinforcement all the
time.
Assumptions of classical conditioning:
- The ultimate goal of classical conditioning is to induce
learning by creating a new response to a stimulus that doesn’t
normally produce that response. In case of Ivan Pavlov’s
experiment, the dog salivating at the sound of the bell.
- Before conditioning the dog, when the food was brought, there
was a salivating dog. By this, we can understand that the response
from the food, (salivating) is involuntary and reflexive, and for a
dog to learn to salivate at the sound of the bell, it must be
conditioned.
- Antecedent stimuli i.e. the bell is a necessary element for the
desired outcome of learning.
- Principles of classical conditioning are important to be listed
for a better and a distinct understanding:
- Acquisition: - Response if first established and strengthened
gradually
- Extinction: - When an unconditioned stimulus is no longer
paired with the conditioned. (food not being paired with the sound
of bell)
- Spontaneous recovery: - learned response can also emerge all of
a sudden post-extinction.
- Stimulus generalization: - Condition when the tendency of a
conditional stimulus to evoke similar response after the response
has been conditioned. (in the case of little Albert, he did not
only cry to the sight of a white mice, but also anything white,
fluffy and furry)
- Stimulus discrimination: - Ability to differentiate between a
conditioned stimulus and other stimuli.
Assumptions of Operant conditioning:
- The main aim of operant conditioning is to increase the rate of
an already occurring response.
- The responses in this are voluntary.
- For forming an association, consequences are important.
- The reinforcement in operant conditioning must be immediate for
learning.
- There is an expectancy which is developed for reinforcement to
follow a correct response.
- Reinforcement may be further be divided into positive and
negative.
- All particular acts result in a consequence, which is the
experience.
- The perceived quality of the act’s consequence may affect the
future behavior.
- The main influence on the behavior is external
Kohler’s research – role of the mind in learning
In the case of insight learning, it is not necessary to have
past experience. There are many ways in which an individual looks
at a problem in order to get to the solution. In case there are any
past experiences, they will be released in order to get to the
solution. In this, trial and error method may not be necessarily
used. Insight learning leads to the change in perception. There
tends to be a trend or a pattern which is detected by the human
mind when it comes to solving a problem. Age plays a major role in
insight learning, adults are better at insight learning than
children.