Question

In: Psychology

Case Brief of DirecTV v. NLRB 1. what facts are important to the case? 2. What...

Case Brief of DirecTV v. NLRB

1. what facts are important to the case?

2. What issues is this case about? 3. What was the court's decision?

4. The reasoning behind the court's decision?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Case Brief of DirecTV v. NLRB

1. what facts are important to the case?

Following facts are important to the case:

(a)Complaint of MasTec technicians.

(b)NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) was not agreeing with Direc TV.

2. What issues is this case about?

MasTec technicians were fired by Direc TV for complaining about the company's new pay policy in an interview with a local news station.

3. What was the court's decision?

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit court ruled 2-1 that DirecTV must reinstate the MasTec technicians it fired for complaining about the company's new pay policy in an interview with a local news station.

4. The reasoning behind the court's decision?

The court agreed with NLRB and found that the company's firing of the employees was an unfair labor practice. Complaining about the company's new pay policy could not lead a company to fire its employees.

Kindly do like if it helped!

Thank you!!!


Related Solutions

Brief the case Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. V. Wood in the order: 1. citation 2. facts...
Brief the case Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. V. Wood in the order: 1. citation 2. facts 3. issue 4. decision ( includes reason for the rule of law and analysis for the result of the preceding case)
Please brief the case for Scott v. Sandford. A Partial brief meaning focusing on the facts...
Please brief the case for Scott v. Sandford. A Partial brief meaning focusing on the facts and issues of the case
Brief the following case: Harris v united states 1.Citation. 2 Facts. ... 3 Issue. ... 4...
Brief the following case: Harris v united states 1.Citation. 2 Facts. ... 3 Issue. ... 4 Decision. ... 5 Reason.
Green v. County school board—brief this case into four sections Facts Issues (the legal question the...
Green v. County school board—brief this case into four sections Facts Issues (the legal question the court took on) Holding Court reasoning
Please brief the case Dred Scott vs Sanford. Partial brief--- Facts and Issues only Separate Facts...
Please brief the case Dred Scott vs Sanford. Partial brief--- Facts and Issues only Separate Facts & Issues
CASE BRIEF 7.2 Tiffany and Company v. Andrew 2012 WL 5451259 (S.D.N.Y.) FACTS: Tiffany (plaintiffs) allege...
CASE BRIEF 7.2 Tiffany and Company v. Andrew 2012 WL 5451259 (S.D.N.Y.) FACTS: Tiffany (plaintiffs) allege that Andrew and others (defendants) sold counterfeit Tiffany products through several websites hosted in the United States. Andrew accepted payment in U.S. dollars, used PayPal, Inc. to process customers' credit card transactions, then transferred the sales proceeds to accounts held by the Bank of China (“BOC”), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (“ICBC”), and China Merchants Bank (“CMB”) (“Banks”). Andrew defaulted on the suit,...
Case brief ------Cotter v. Lyft, Inc. 1. Case 2. Issue 3. Rule 4. Analysis 5. Conclusion
Case brief ------Cotter v. Lyft, Inc. 1. Case 2. Issue 3. Rule 4. Analysis 5. Conclusion
Write a Case Brief on the case Pasquarella v. 1525 WIlliam St.
Write a Case Brief on the case Pasquarella v. 1525 WIlliam St.
Brief case of New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira,
Brief case of New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira,
brief IRAC of case 40.1 Oliveira v. Sugarman
brief IRAC of case 40.1 Oliveira v. Sugarman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT