In: Finance
Some of the limitations that virtual currencies presently face –
such as the fact that one’s digital fortune can be erased by a
computer crash, or that a virtual vault may be ransacked by a
hacker – may be overcome in time through technological advances.
What will be harder to surmount is the basic paradox that bedevils
virtual currencies – the more popular they become, the more
regulation and government scrutiny they are likely to attract,
which erodes the fundamental premise for their existence.
While the number of merchants who accept virtual currencies has
steadily increased, they are still very much in the minority. For
virtual currencies to become more widely used, they have to first
gain widespread acceptance among consumers. However, their relative
complexity compared to conventional currencies will likely deter
most people, except for the technologically adept.
A virtual currency that aspires to become part of the mainstream
financial system may have to satisfy widely divergent criteria. It
would need to be mathematically complex (to avoid fraud and hacker
attacks) but easy for consumers to understand; decentralized but
with adequate consumer safeguards and protection; and preserve user
anonymity without being a conduit for tax evasion, money laundering
and other nefarious activities. Since these are formidable criteria
to satisfy, is it possible that the most popular virtual currency
in a few years’ time could have attributes that fall in between
heavily-regulated fiat currencies and today’s virtual currencies?
While that possibility looks remote, there is little doubt that as
the leading virtual currency at present, Bitcoin’s success (or lack
thereof) in dealing with the challenges it faces may determine the
fortunes of other virtual currencies in the years ahead.