In: Statistics and Probability
it is a different table so please do the calculation again
Heat treating is often used to carburize metal parts, such as gears. The thickness of the carburized layer is considered a crucial feature of the gear and contributes to the overall reliability of the part. Because of the critical nature of this feature, two different lab tests are performed on each furnace load. One test is run on a sample pin that accompanies each load. The other test is a destructive test, where an actual part is cross-sectioned. This test involves running a carbon analysis on the surface of both the gear pitch (top of the gear tooth) and the gear root (between the gear teeth). Table 12-6 shows the results of the pitch carbon analysis test for
Temp |
SoakTime |
SoakPct |
DiffTime |
DiffPct |
Pitch |
1650 |
0.58 |
1.1 |
0.25 |
0.9 |
0.013 |
1650 |
0.66 |
1.1 |
0.33 |
0.9 |
0.016 |
1650 |
0.66 |
1.1 |
0.33 |
0.9 |
0.015 |
1650 |
0.66 |
1.1 |
0.33 |
0.95 |
0.016 |
1600 |
0.66 |
1.15 |
0.33 |
1 |
0.015 |
1600 |
0.66 |
1.15 |
0.33 |
1 |
0.016 |
1650 |
1 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.014 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.1 |
0.58 |
0.8 |
0.021 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.1 |
0.58 |
0.8 |
0.018 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.1 |
0.58 |
0.8 |
0.019 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.1 |
0.58 |
0.9 |
0.021 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.1 |
0.58 |
0.9 |
0.019 |
1650 |
1.17 |
1.15 |
0.58 |
0.9 |
0.021 |
1650 |
1.2 |
1.15 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.025 |
1650 |
2 |
1.15 |
1 |
0.8 |
0.025 |
1650 |
2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.026 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.024 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.025 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.15 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
0.024 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.025 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.027 |
1650 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
0.026 |
1650 |
3 |
1.15 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
0.029 |
1650 |
3 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.03 |
1650 |
3 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.75 |
0.028 |
1650 |
3 |
1.15 |
1.66 |
0.85 |
0.032 |
1650 |
3.33 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
0.033 |
1700 |
4 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.039 |
1650 |
4 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.04 |
1650 |
4 |
1.15 |
1.5 |
0.85 |
0.035 |
1700 |
12.5 |
1 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.056 |
1700 |
18.5 |
1 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
0.068 |
(a) The regression equation is:
Pitch = -0.0784 + 0.00004392*Temp + 0.0025*SoakTime + 0.0183*SoakPct + 0.0078*DiffTime - 0.0031*DiffPct
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
Regression | 0.00419226 | 5 | 0.00083845 | 162.43 | 9.54E-19 | |
Residual | 0.00013421 | 26 | 0.00000516 | |||
Total | 0.00432647 | 31 | ||||
Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=26) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper |
Intercept | -0.0784 | |||||
Temp | 0.00004392 | 0.00003627 | 1.211 | .2369 | -0.00003064 | 0.00011848 |
SoakTime | 0.0025 | 0.00020822 | 11.787 | 6.22E-12 | 0.0020 | 0.0029 |
SoakPct | 0.0183 | 0.0201 | 0.911 | .3707 | -0.0231 | 0.0597 |
DiffTime | 0.0078 | 0.0013 | 5.770 | 4.46E-06 | 0.0050 | 0.0106 |
DiffPct | -0.0031 | 0.0081 | -0.389 | .7003 | -0.0197 | 0.0134 |
The analysis of variance indicates that the model is significant.
(b)
variables | VIF |
Intercept | |
Temp | 3.167 |
SoakTime | 3.346 |
SoakPct | 3.186 |
DiffTime | 2.505 |
DiffPct | 2.748 |
There is no multicollinearity.
(c) The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β1 = 0
H1: β1 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.2369.
Since the p-value (0.2369) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that β1 is significant.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β2 = 0
H1: β2 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.0000.
Since the p-value (0.0000) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we can conclude that β2 is significant.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β3 = 0
H1: β3 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.3707.
Since the p-value (0.3707) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that β3 is significant.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β4 = 0
H1: β4 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.0000.
Since the p-value (0.0000) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we can conclude that β4 is significant.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: β5 = 0
H1: β5 ≠ 0
The p-value is 0.7003.
Since the p-value (0.7003) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we cannot conclude that β5 is significant.
(d) The normal probability plot of the residuals is:
The model is adequate.
(e) The regression equation is:
Pitch = 0.0109 + 0.0025*SoakTime + 0.0088*DiffTime
R² | 0.966 | |||||
Adjusted R² | 0.964 | |||||
R | 0.983 | |||||
Std. Error | 0.002 | |||||
n | 32 | |||||
k | 2 | |||||
Dep. Var. | Pitch | |||||
ANOVA table | ||||||
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value | |
Regression | 0.00417950 | 2 | 0.00208975 | 412.35 | 5.02E-22 | |
Residual | 0.00014697 | 29 | 0.00000507 | |||
Total | 0.00432647 | 31 | ||||
Regression output | confidence interval | |||||
variables | coefficients | std. error | t (df=29) | p-value | 95% lower | 95% upper |
Intercept | 0.0109 | |||||
SoakTime | 0.0025 | 0.00013299 | 18.516 | 1.31E-17 | 0.0022 | 0.0027 |
DiffTime | 0.0088 | 0.0010 | 8.811 | 1.07E-09 | 0.0067 | 0.0108 |
Please give me a thumbs-up if this helps you out. Thank you!