In: Statistics and Probability
Case Study 2: Forecasting Box Office Returns
For years, people in the motion picture industry – critics, film historians, and others – have eagerly awaited the second issue in January of Variety. Long considered the show business bible, Variety is a weekly trade newspaper that reports on all aspects of the entertainment industry; movies, television, recordings, concert tours, and so on. The second issue in January, called the Anniversary Edition, summarizes how the entertainment industry fared in the previous year, both artistically and commercially.
In this issue, Variety publishes its list of All Time Film Rental Champs. This list indicates, in descending order, motion pictures and the amount of money they returned to the studio. Because a movie theater rents a film from a studio for a limited time, the money paid for admission by ticket buyers is split between the studio and theater owner. For example, if a ticket buyer pays $8 to see a particular movie, the theater owner keeps about $4 and the studio receives the other $4. The longer a movie plays in a theater, the greater the percentage of the admission price returned to the studio. A film playing for an entire summer could eventually return as much as 90% of the $8 to the studio. The theater owner also benefits from such a success because although the owner’s percentage of the admission price is small, the sales of concessions (candy, soda and so on) provide greater profits. Thus, both the studio and the theater owner win when a film continues to draw audiences for a long time. Variety lists the rental figures (the actual dollar amounts returned to the studios) that the films have accrued in their domestic releases (United States and Canada).
In addition, Variety provides a monthly Box-Office Barometer of the film industry, which is a profile of the month’s domestic box-office returns. This profile is not measure in dollars, but scaled according to some standard. By the late 1980’s, for example, the scale was based on numbers around 100, with 100 representing the average box-office return of 1980. The figures from 1987 and 1996 are given in the table below and in the file BoxOffice.xlsx in blackboard.
All the figures are scaled around the 1980’s box-office returns, but instead of dollars, artificial numbers are used. Film executives can get a relative indication of the box-office figures compared to the arbitrary 1980 scale. For example, in January 1987 the box-office returns to the film industry were 95% of the average that year, whereas in January 1988 the returns were 104% of the average of 1980 (or, they were 4% above the average of 1980’s figure).
Month |
1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Jan |
95 |
104 |
101 |
88 |
132 |
125 |
111 |
127 |
119 |
147 |
Feb |
94 |
100 |
96 |
110 |
109 |
118 |
123 |
129 |
147 |
146 |
Mar |
98 |
99 |
82 |
129 |
101 |
121 |
121 |
132 |
164 |
133 |
Apr |
96 |
88 |
84 |
113 |
111 |
140 |
139 |
108 |
135 |
148 |
May |
95 |
89 |
85 |
114 |
140 |
141 |
119 |
115 |
124 |
141 |
Jun |
115 |
108 |
124 |
169 |
179 |
201 |
156 |
149 |
168 |
191 |
Jul |
107 |
109 |
134 |
131 |
145 |
152 |
154 |
155 |
159 |
178 |
Aug |
104 |
101 |
109 |
139 |
140 |
138 |
136 |
129 |
137 |
156 |
Sep |
96 |
106 |
121 |
120 |
120 |
137 |
105 |
117 |
149 |
119 |
Oct |
112 |
102 |
111 |
115 |
129 |
138 |
132 |
166 |
159 |
138 |
Nov |
98 |
78 |
101 |
116 |
118 |
144 |
123 |
152 |
175 |
175 |
Dec |
102 |
111 |
112 |
128 |
139 |
148 |
164 |
173 |
195 |
188 |
From the time series given in the above table, you will make a forecast for the 12 months of the next year, 1997.
Managerial Report is due on … Thursday, 19 Sept (40 pts)
Enrichment (5 pts): Use Optimization (and Solver in Excel) to find the optimal smoothing constant in problem 2 above (by minimizing the Mean Squared Error or MSE).
solution:
(1)
The time series plot is shown below:-
From the plot,is is clear that the data has a)Seasonality and b) Trend
(2)
Exponential smoothing with =0.1612(obtained by minimizing MSE using solver)
CALCULATIONS:-
(3)
The R2 valve is poor(only 52%).Therefore, only 52% of the data points are explained by the model.
(4)
Here using the deseasonalized data, the R2 valve slightly improve to 65%
(5)
Summary of forecasts from all the methods
As per this analysis, therefore, the last method i.e the multiplicative model is more appropriate.