In: Accounting
CALCULATIONS FOR SCHEDULE 3: 2019 Budgeted Overhead Calculations | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | Add column names as appropriate | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
EXISTING OVERHEAD ALLOCATION: | ? | ? | ? | Tax | Bookkeeping | Advisory | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
ACTIVITY BASED COSTING ALLOCATION OF OVERHEAD COSTS | ? | ? | ? | ? | Activity by service | Cost per service | ||||
Activity | Cost | Cost driver | Total cost driver | Cost per cost driver | Tax | Bookkeeping | Advisory | Tax | Bookkeeping | Advisory |
facility related | $96,000 | floor space | 380 | $252.63 | 130 | 55 | 195 | $32,842.11 | $13,894.74 | $49,263.16 |
technical support | $24,000 | # of IT request | 136 | $176.47 | 46 | 15 | 75 | $8,117.65 | $2,647.06 | $13,235.29 |
adminstrative | $160,000 | billiable hours | 14136 | $11.32 | 5,600 | 1,830 | 6,700 | $63,384.27 | $20,713.07 | $75,834.75 |
client travel | $82,000 | km's travelled | 2320 | $35.34 | 330 | 80 | 1,910 | $11,663.79 | $2,827.59 | $67,508.62 |
advertising | $48,000 | # clients | 200 | $240.00 | 73 | 19 | 108 | $17,520.00 | $4,560.00 | $25,920.00 |
? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | Total | $133,527.81 | $44,642.45 | $231,761.82 |
Total overhead | $410,000 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
Total Billable hours | 14,130 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
OH rate= | $29.02 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
OH COST ADVISORY | $194,409.06 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
OH Cost Bookkeeping | $53,099.79 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
OH Cost Tax | $162,491.15 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
SCHEDULE 4: | Prepare a comparison of overhead allocation : | ||
? | ? | ? | ? |
Existing OH Allocation | ? | ABC Allocation | ? |
OH Rate: | ? | OH Rates: | ? |
Per Billable hour | ? | Per Activity | ? |
$29.02 | Facility related | $252.63 | |
? | ? | Technical Support | $176.47 |
? | ? | Administrative | $11.32 |
? | ? | Client Travel | $35.34 |
? | ? | Advertising | $240.00 |
OH costs by service (total $) | ? | OH costs by service (total $) | ? |
Tax | ? | Tax | $133,527.81 |
Bookkeeping | ? | Bookkeeping | $44,642.45 |
Advisory | 194,409.09 | Advisory | $231,762 |
question
please analyze that comparison of the overhead allocation to each service unit under both methods, traditional and Activity-Based Costing (ABC), which method is better for this company??
ans
Activity based costing identifies different cost pool and activities associated with it and allocates cost on this basis, so this gives accurate allocation of cost to products and increases the traceability of the cost to the product or services. In other words ABC costing assigns factory/manufacturing overhead based on the activities identified and assigning cost to those activities according to the actual consumption by each activity. If cost is wrongly traced the product or services can be under priced or over priced which can affect the sales volume and customers. Hence there can be loss of customers in case of over price and loss of revenue in case of under price. So when proper cost is assigned to each activity than we are able to know which cost is in control and which cost is going out of control. So those cost which are increasing we could fix up the responsibility to those handling that and we could take steps to control the cost.
whereas Traditional method of allocation of manufacturing overhead based on predetermined overhead rate so it does not give correct allocation of overhead as ABC costing gives
The question you have asked of for analysing | |||||||||
Traditional Method | ABC | ||||||||
Overhead cost allocated | |||||||||
Advisory | $194,409 | $231,762 | |||||||
Bookkeeping | 53100 | 44642 | |||||||
Tax | 162491 | 133528 | |||||||
It is better to use ABC as cost allocated to advisory is less in traditional method so the cost is undervalued | |||||||||
which results in increase in ptrofit for Advisory services which is not the real case | |||||||||
Bookeeping services overhead cost is allocated more in traditional method so cost is overvalued which results in decraese in profits | |||||||||
Tax services overhead cost is allocated more in traditional method so cost is overvalued which results in decrease in profits but that is not true | |||||||||
Hence it is better to use ABC so that correct cost can be computed for the sevices |