Question

1. The exact point in time at which an individual transitions from one developmental phase to another (for example, middle childhood to adolescence) is often assigned somewhat arbitrarily. In fact, even developmental scientists/authors don't always agree on "where" the lines between these artificial constructs fall. If you were given the task to defend why a particular child had moved solidly into adolescence, what would be the 3 most important non-physical areas of development you would examine to make the decision (i.e., some specific cognitive or psychosocial characteristic/skill)? In addition, describe how you would expect an adolescent to function differently in each of these 3 characteristics/skills you have selected.

2. Based on what we have learned about adolescent brain maturation and psychosocial development, are there circumstances under which you think an adolescent should be eligible for the death penalty? Support your opinion with your rationale and theoretical support. If so, at what age? What other factors, if any, should enter into such a decision? If you disagree provide theoretical evidence in regards to childhood development which supports your stance.

Answer 1

1.

Independence – One of the important characteristic of the birth of adolescence is doing things independently. So far, they were guided and helped by parents and caregivers but now all of a sudden they don’t want to be guided and advised by their parents and caregivers.

Seeking Adventurous Activities – They go out very often engaging in more adventurous and risky activities. They become fearless and face dangers without second thought. They start spending less time with parents and spend more time with their friends. Taking adventures is also part and parcel of peer pressures.

Seeking sexual partners – They actively look for a sexual partner, although it’s only a physical attraction. They spend more time alone talking to someone over the phone and slip away from home without anyone noticing them in order to spend time with the opposite sex.

2. In my opinion, an adolescent cannot be given death penalty because most of the psychologists believe that an adolescent is not a mature human being and he may be used by other adults. The U.S. Supreme court has also ruled out death penalty for juveniles in 2004. According to a poll conducted in the U.S. in 2003, 69% of the people voted against the juvenile death penalty. Psychologists say that an adolescent will be able to make decisions on his own in severe matters between 18 and 22. So in my opinion, a death penalty should be awarded to one who is 18 years and above. This again to cruel murderers and not for people who tried to protect themselves from possible attackers or threat.