Question

Between Gartner's Hype Cycle and the technology S-Curve, Which one is better or more suitable for your use? Why?

Answer 1

Both of the mentioned techniques are useful in their respective ways. Both the S-curve and hype cycle help to give setting on the innovation lifecycle in two essential measurements: the relative expense or exertion (for example time and cash) of the innovation, and its viability for taking care of genuine issues or use cases; nonetheless, each model uses somewhat various measurements. The S- curve is progressively centered on the growth of the given item as far as positioning in the commercial center; the publicity cycle enables leaders to survey the advantages of another innovation with regards to their particular industry given their capacity to bear chance.

Both of these measures help to give setting to a specific innovation as far as the possible hazard and prize. From a investor's point of view the higher the hazard the more noteworthy the prize, so the financial specialist is quick to choose innovation ventures that is right off the bat in the S-curve. For the innovation organization hoping to enhance in the market, they have to comprehend the innovation life-cycle and the suggestions it has on the valuation and target advertise. At long last, from an innovation management viewpoint, understanding where innovation is in the publicity cycle comes to hold up under the dynamic and timing around the reception.