Question

In: Economics

Suppose that OPEC cartel imposes an embargo on oil exports to the US, which causes global...

Suppose that OPEC cartel imposes an embargo on oil exports to the US, which causes global oil prices to double that forces the domestic gas prices to rise to $5 per gallon. Thus, to make gasoline more affordable for American consumers the US Government decides to impose $3 price ceiling on it at the retail level. What would be the economic consequences of such government intervention in the market mechanism? What alternative rationing mechanisms will the market have to resort to as the means of gas distribution if the price ceiling remains for a long time?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A price ceiling is mandating the maximum price that the producer can charge for a good. The price ceiling one of the many tools that the government use to control the free market mechanism of any goods.

In this case, the price ceiling is set below the market clearing rate of $5. That is at the sealed price of $3 there will be more potential buyers than sellers. That is there will be excess demand in the market.

As the current price does not clear the market (demand equals supply), the market resort to other non-price mechanisms. For example, the excess demand will cause long waiting lines at the gas station. People have to wait to get gas as supply is below demand at a market price of $3. The time cost will increase the price of gas near the equilibrium price. If the price control lasts in the long run, there will be an illegal market for gas, where the gas will be sold at a market price outside the legal market for gas.


Related Solutions

Consider the world oil market, in which a cartel (OPEC) and a competitive fringe (rest of...
Consider the world oil market, in which a cartel (OPEC) and a competitive fringe (rest of the world) are operating. Suppose that global oil demand and the supply of the competitive fringe are given by the following functions: Qw=80-P Qf=-60+p suppose the cartel is comprised of 2 countries, let each countries marginal cost function be as follows: MC1=5+2Q2 MC2=5+2Q2 Derive the marginal cost function (?C?) of the cartel. (2 pt) Calculate the price at which the competitive fringe would be...
Since the early 1970s, the world oil market has been buffeted by the OPEC cartel and...
Since the early 1970s, the world oil market has been buffeted by the OPEC cartel and by political turmoil in the Persian Gulf. In 1974, by collectively restraining output, OPEC (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) pushed world oil prices well above what they would have been in a competitive market. OPEC could do this because it accounted for much of world oil production. During 1979-1980, oil prices shot up again, as the Iranian revolution and the outbreak of the...
Suppose that an oil cartel effectively increases the price of oil by 100 percent, leading to...
Suppose that an oil cartel effectively increases the price of oil by 100 percent, leading to a supply shock in both Country A and Country B. Assume that both countries were in the long-run equilibrium (full employment) at the same level of output and prices at the time of the shock. (a) Describe the short-run impact of this supply shock on prices and output in each country. Do not forget to support your answer on a graph. (b) Now assume...
Should the US just apply to join OPEC to avoid a future oil crisis?
Should the US just apply to join OPEC to avoid a future oil crisis?
What are some causes for low global oil prices?
What are some causes for low global oil prices?
Suppose that Country X subsidizes its exports and Country Y imposes a “countervailing” tariff that offsets...
Suppose that Country X subsidizes its exports and Country Y imposes a “countervailing” tariff that offsets the subsidy’s effect, so that in the end, relative prices in Country Y are unchanged. What happens to the terms of trade? What about welfare in the two countries? Suppose, on the other hand, that Country Y retaliates with an export subsidy of its own. Contrast the result.
Suppose that Saudi Arabia lets other members of OPEC sell all the oil they want at...
Suppose that Saudi Arabia lets other members of OPEC sell all the oil they want at the existing price which the Saudis set and other members accept. The daily world demand for OPEC oil is given by: P = 88 – 2Q where P is the price per barrel of oil and Q the total quantity of OPEC oil (in millions of barrels per day). The supply function for other members of OPEC who behave like a “competitive fringe” is...
Suppose that the spot price of oil is US$19, The quoted 1-year futures price of oil...
Suppose that the spot price of oil is US$19, The quoted 1-year futures price of oil is us$16 The 1-year US$ interest rate is 5% per annum The storage cost of oil are %2 per annum is there an arbitrage opportunity? is yes, please explain how you can observe this opportunity.
The greenhouse effect causes an increase in global temperatures, which has contributed to global climate change....
The greenhouse effect causes an increase in global temperatures, which has contributed to global climate change. This temperature increase is due primarily to: a) CO2​ and other greenhouse gases allowing more solar radiation to penetrate Earth's surface    b) CO2​ and other greenhouse gases slowing the escape of heat from Earth    c) the loss of ozone that trapped cooling UV radiation in the atmosphere    d) CO2 and other greenhouse gases slowing the escape of UV radiation from Earth
Assume that the US has a comparative advantage in producing good x, which it exports and...
Assume that the US has a comparative advantage in producing good x, which it exports and has exported for many years. Does that mean it will continue to have a comparative advantage in x? Why (not)? If not, why might it change?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT