Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A consumer preference study involving three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) for the jumbo...

A consumer preference study involving three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) for the jumbo size of a new liquid laundry detergent was carried out using a randomized block experimental design, with supermarkets as blocks. Specifically, four supermarkets were supplied with all three bottle designs, which were priced the same. The following table gives the number of bottles of each design sold in a 24-hour period at each supermarket. If we use these data, SST, SSB, and SSE can be calculated to be 586.1667, 421.6667, and 1.8333, respectively.

Results of a Bottle Design Experiment
Supermarket, j
Bottle Design, i 1 2 3 4
A 16 14 1 6
B 33 30 19 23
C 23 21 8 12

(a&b) Test the null hypothesis H0 that no differences exist between the effects of the bottle designs and supermarkets on mean daily sales. Set α = .05. Can we conclude that the different bottle designs have different effects on mean sales? (Round F to 2 decimal places and SS, MS to 3 decimal places. Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter "0" wherever required.)

Analysis of Variance for factorl

Tukey q.05 = 4.34, MSE = .306, s = .553, b = 4

Source DF SS MS F
P
Bottle
Market
Error
Total

(c) Use Tukey simultaneous 95 percent confidence intervals to make pairwise comparisons of the bottle design effects on mean daily sales. Which bottle design(s) maximize mean sales? (Round your answers 2 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.)

AB: [ ,  ]
AC: [ ,  ]
BC: [ ,  ]

  Bottle design (A, B, OR C) maximizes sales.


Solutions

Expert Solution

a & b)

using excel data analysis tool for two factor anova, following o/p Is obtained :

write data>menu>data>data analysis>anova :two factor without replication>enter required labels>ok, and following o/p Is obtained,

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication
SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance
A 4 37 9 48.917
B 4 105 26 40.917
C 4 64 16 51.333
sample 1 3 72 24 73.000
`SAMPLE 2 3 65 142 64.333
SAMPLE 3 3 28 134 82.333
SAMPLE 4 3 41 13.667 74.333
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 586.17 2 293.08 959.18 0.00 5.14
Columns 421.67 3 140.56 460.00 0.00 4.76
Error 1.83 6 0.31
Total 1009.67 11
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F-stat p-value
Rows 586.167 2 293.083 959.18 0.0000
Columns 421.667 3 140.556 460.00 0.0000
Error 1.833 6 0.306
Total 1009.667 11

c)

A B C
count, ni = 4 4 4
mean , x̅ i =Σxi / ni 9.250 26.250 16.000
Level of significance 0.05
no of treatments 3
df error 6
MSE 0.3056
q-statistic value 4.34

Tukey Kramer test
critical value = q*√(MSE/2*(1/ni+1/nj))

confidence interval = mean difference ± critical value

if confidence interval contans zero, then means are not different.

confidence interval
population mean difference critical value lower limit upper limit result
AB -17.0 1.1995 -18.20 -15.80 means are different
AC -6.8 1.1995 -7.95 -5.55 means are different
BC 10.3 1.1995 9.05 11.45 means are different

  Bottle design ( B ) maximizes sales.


Related Solutions

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 17...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 17...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 16...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are given below. Let μA, μB, and μC represent the mean daily sales using...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 18...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 19...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 13...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C)...
A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. Bottle Design Study Data A B C 15...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT