In: Statistics and Probability
In a study of cereal leaf beetle damage on oats, researchers measured the number of beetle larvae per stem in small plots of oats after randomly applying one of two treatments: no pesticide or Malathion at the rate of 0.25 pound per acre.
Control: | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment: | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Is there significant evidence at the 1% level that the mean number of larvae per stem is reduced by Malathion? Carry out a complete test.
Here, we are to test,
where,
or, equivalently, to test,
where,
The test statistic is given by:
Under H0,
where,
We reject H0 at level
iff
where,
Now,
Also,
Now,
Hence, H0 is rejected at 1% level of significance. That is, there
is significanct evidence that the treatment is effective. Or, in
other words, Malathion at 0.25 pounds per acre has reduced mean
level of larvae.
I hope this clarifies your doubt. If you're satisfied with the
solution, hit the Like button. For further
clarification, comment below. Thank You. :)