In: Accounting
Write a 3-4-page academic paper that analyzes the key components of a strategic planning framework, assesses the value of using a strategic planning framework, and explains the role of leadership in the strategic planning process.
INTRODUCTION: THE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
This paper presents the basic framework for comprehensive strategic analysis. The basic purpose of
strategic analysis is to help analyze how the firm can generate returns in excess of the firm’s
opportunity costs (these are rents) by engaging in a more effective corporate strategy and, at the
business level, more effective competitive strategy (Porter, 1996).
The framework describes and briefly explains the major components of a strategic analysis,
and outlines the major components of strategic analysis and the order they should be covered in a
project write-up. It consists, therefore, of a coherent “skeleton” of a comprehensive strategic
analysis. Of course, it is only a generic guide. A project should be adapted to the specific needs (i.e.,
the project specification) of the client. Corporate-level analysis for firms with multiple business units
is more complex than an analysis of firms in a single line of business. Some projects are more
oriented to an industry analysis (a potential client for this type of analysis might be a firm
considering entering the industry).
The logic of a comprehensive strategic analysis is simple: describe and explain the
issue/problem, assess it, try to solve it. Of course, we actually analyze problems in a much more non-
linear manner than this in practice, but writing-up an analysis in this linear, “rational” mode is the
only way to make the analysis understandable to the client. Therefore, usually, a written
comprehensive strategic analysis contains three major parts, in the following order: analysis of the
current situation, assessment of the current situation (fulcrum) and solution analysis.
1. A Vision
No surprises here – we need to start off by defining our vision for the organization (the destination). Your vision will help you to:
2. Core Values
Values really don’t get the credit they deserve! People often see them as throw-away and vacuous – more aimed at marketing the organization than guiding its true internal behaviors. But a well crafted set of values can be the difference between success and failure for your strategic plan.
The values that should go into your strategic plan are not the usual sickly-sweet values you’ll see in corporate marketing videosaimed at customers. Instead they need to be a frank self-assessment of how you want your organization to behave as it goes about delivering against its vision and mission / focus areas. They should ideally reflect the values of your very best people, and the values that have helped you to succeed the most in your journey to date.
3. Clearly Defined Outcomes
A strategic plan is nothing without a set of clearly defined outcomes. Visions, missions and focus areas are a great starting point – but no-one will take your plan seriously unless you can clearly articulate what steps you are going to take to get there – and what success looks like for each of those steps.
4. Accountability
This is such a small detail, but it is also one of the key elements of a strategic plan that so many organizations fail to implement. A lack of accountability will absolutely destroy your strategy execution. Lacking or confusing accountability results in:
5. KPIs
OK, I’ll admit it – creating KPIs is probably the hardest of all the key elements of a strategic plan. But without KPIs, you won’t know until it’s too late about whether or not you’re succeeding as you head towards your vision.
The Six Roles of Strategic Planning
1. Setting Organizational Direction
The assumption is that organizations ought to plan for the future
and set out a path on which to travel. Direction answers the
questions: Where do we want to go? What do we want to be in the
future? This function is often manifested in the saying "doing the
right thing". There is a certain intuitive logic than an
organization must have some idea of where it is going or where it
wants to be in order to provide direction for daily decision
making.
2. Concentration of Effort
An organization needs a means of prioritizing effort and resources.
Different decisions lead to different outcomes, which may or may
not support the direction that has been chosen. A set of focus
guidelines must come from a strategy. Priorities must be developed;
otherwise, planning becomes a long wish list.
3. Understanding the Organization
We need to develop an understanding of the culture and history of
the organization. A strategy is a window into the organization,
both for outsiders and insiders. Organizations are large and
complex, even for insiders. Of course, there is sometimes a problem
with the over-simplification of complex systems, but we need a
model of behaviour that can be understood. Mintzberg talks about
the "clarification" of organizations. Jensen talks about the
"crystallization" of the organization. We cannot transform an
organization without understanding it. Simple tools such as a SWOT
analysis help develop insight.
4. Understanding the External Environment
An organization cannot exist without paying attention to the
outside world. The phrase "managing from the outside in" sums up
the process. The impact of competitors and other external forces
needs to be understood; they form the basis of the longer run
strategy of any organization. Strategy has been envisaged as a fit
of organizational resources and the external environment, where
programs, products, and services are matched to the external
environment. Strategic planning is the vehicle for organizational
adaptation.
5. Keeper, Seeker, Disseminator of Information and
Values
Information and feedback is at the root of developing learning
communities within organizations.
6. Springboard for Action
Whether it is reinventing the organization or introducing a new
product or service, you need a platform to base the action on and
to support it.