Question

In: Accounting

Define ideal and normal standards. How do ideal and normal standards differ? Describe some of the...

Define ideal and normal standards. How do ideal and normal standards differ? Describe some of the criticisms of the use of standards. Lastly, write about one definition or additional concept related to standards.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Standard in simple words is a measure of what is expected to take place under the current or anticipated circumstances. Another way of defining standard is that it is something that is predetermined or planned and management wishes that actual results equate to standards.

Standards are one of important quantitative tools in the hand of management to control and measure performance of business operations. However it heavily depends on the type of standards used to decide about the control actions and to measure the performance.

Types of standards

Following are different types of standards:

  • Basic standards

  • Normal standards

  • Current standards

  • Attainable (expected) standards

  • Ideal (theoretical) standards

    Normal Standards

    These are such standards which are expected if normal circumstances prevail. Term normal represents the normal conditions of the business in the absence of any unexpected fluctuations (either favourable or unfavourable). Even through normal standards are more of a theoretical in nature as reality cannot be sufficiently predicted with all its fluctuations in advance. Also, circumstances may change in such a way that factors which were expected to be controllable are not so controllable by the mangers. Thus it has limited application in today’s business environment. However, normal standards acts as a good yardstick that represents challenging yet attainable results and can be used by management in such environment which is simple in nature and is not prone to great fluctuations.

    Ideal standards / Theoretical standards.

    These standards represents what business operations would be under ideal set of circumstances where everything is running at the optimum level with an ideal balance. These standards are representative of long term goals rather than for short term performance measurement. But with the advancement of technology and inventions even the ideal standards become attainable over the period of time but with every step taken forward and every question answered, more questions and more complexities pop up and its in human nature that it always extends the way forward with every milestone achieved. Therefore, ideal standards are not meant to be achieved rather to act like a guiding star.


             Classification of standards is done in the following categories based upon period of operation, tightness & looseness:

    Based on period of operations:

              (1) Current Standard.
              (2) Basic Standards.
              (3) Normal Standards.

    Based on Tightness & Looseness:

              (4) Ideal Standards.
              (5) Expected or attainable standards.

    Current Standards: The establishment of current standards is done for giving specific regard to current conditions, in which use of standards are made. The main features of current standard are: (a) under current conditions, these standards outline what should be the cost; (b) these standards call or make frequent revisions & periodical review; (c) with changes in production method & price level, these standards are required to be changed; (d) for related period of accounting, these standards hold good. It is easier to understand these standards which for the purpose of managerial control have proved most useful. The use of the current standards has two main advantages:

    (i) For short periods, definite goals are provided by these standards, which can be expected to reach easily by employees. For the purpose of measurement of current performances, these standards appear to be fair bases. Current standards are set at a high level which can be attained if reasonably diligent efforts & attention is put to the correct method of doing the job. For the purpose of stimulating efficiency these standards may be effective.
    (ii) As expected actual performance is closely represented by current standards, it’s economical to use the same. In the processes of planning, budgeting & control, such attainable standards can be used. Current standards which are not close to expected actual performance may be applicable for the purpose of control but for the purpose of planning & budgeting use, they are not realistic.

    Basic Standards: These are also called by different names, like fixed standard, static standard etc. The main features of basic standard are: (a) for an unaltered use for a long period of time, these standards are established; (b) with same base line consistent comparison is allowed by these standards; (c) with current conditions these standards may not stand in harmony; (d) level of efficiency required are not specified; (e) special class of standards of a statistical nature are represented by these standards; (f) basic standards are used in the same way as commodity price indices are used by the statisticians; (g) serve as a yardstick with which comparison of actual performance can be done; (h) unless there is any change in the products or the manufacturing operations or processes, these standards are not revised. The main advantage of the basic standard is that the number of revisions which with change in cost of materials & labour, would be required, can be minimized.

    No change other than a cost relationship computation between the basic period & the current period is required when use of basic standards is done. For the purpose of adjusting the standard costs before comparison is made with the actual costs, this cost relationship computation is used. In industries where the routines & operations are well established & where for a long period working conditions do not normally change, these standards can be use. For highlighting trends these standards may be good but for the purpose of gauging efficiency, basis cannot be formed by these standards.

    Normal Standards: Upon the past averages which are adjusted to anticipate future changes, these standards are based. For relatively longer period covering a trade cycle, the preparation of these standards is done. For the formation of these standards, allowance is given to normal fatigues & breaks, normal mistakes in production, normal waste & scrap & normal machine breakdown & maintenance. The cost performance is represented by theses standards which should normally be attained. Because of the probable errors in the prediction of the extent & duration of the cyclical effects, these standards are very likely attainable but they are very difficult to compute. A standard should not be very high so that frustration is caused but it should be high enough so that reasonably diligent effort needed for its accomplishment can be expected. For long term planning & decision making purpose, the normal standard may be good but their utility is limited in appraisal of efficiency.

    Ideal Standards: Under these standards, upon perfection, attention is focused. The aim of these standards is on absolutely minimum cost which only in perfect operating conditions can be attained. No scraps, idle time, break down & rest period is provided by these standards. These standards become impossible to be attained in the long run. In practice idle standards are rarely attained & have been referred to as theoretical standards. Unfavorable variances are being revealed by the accounts as regular feature where ideal standards are used. As a result of this among the staff members depressing feeling occurs. Idle standards can be used without change or adjustment for a long time. Unless radical changes are being made in the product or in the manufacturing processes, these standards once set are rarely being changed. These standards can also be used in highly mechanized industry as engineering standards.

    Expected or attainable Standards: This standard is a compromise between extremes of normal standard & extremes of idle standard. The main features of these standards are: (a) for the purpose of providing for operating inefficiencies which are unavoidable, these standards are set; (b) conditions prevailing in the period for which use of standards are made are taken into account; (c) for the purpose of evaluation of performance, these standards provide best criterion & are very realistic in nature; (d) as all requirements of good standards are fulfilled by these standards, i.e., these standards are consistent, are attainable, realistic & provide incentive for improvement; they have got the maximum usage. Level of performance expected in these standards is higher than level of performance expected in normal standard. But this level is higher enough that reasonably diligent effort for accomplishment can be expected. For cost control purpose these standards are very useful & are capable of fulfillment.


Related Solutions

Define "ethics." How do ethics and morals differ? What are some of the rules for ethical...
Define "ethics." How do ethics and morals differ? What are some of the rules for ethical decision–making?
What are the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and how do they differ from the Generally...
What are the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and how do they differ from the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the US? What are some challenges adopting these standards here, and how are companies with a multinational focus impacted? Research this topic online.
Q1. What are ideal and practical standards? Which do you think is better? Q2. How are...
Q1. What are ideal and practical standards? Which do you think is better? Q2. How are standard costs developed? Take one of the standards and tell how it is developed. Q3. What is the difference between a standard costing and a budget?
What is ideal body weight? Why do some (ok most) people associate ideal weight with how...
What is ideal body weight? Why do some (ok most) people associate ideal weight with how they look? Why are we so fixated with looking thin?
What are NHCs and how do they differ from "normal" carbenes?(NHCs is N-heterocyclic carbenes)
What are NHCs and how do they differ from "normal" carbenes?(NHCs is N-heterocyclic carbenes)
Assuming normal heptane and normal octane to form ideal solutions, do the following: d) Calculate the...
Assuming normal heptane and normal octane to form ideal solutions, do the following: d) Calculate the dew pressure of the solution at 40 ◦C. e) Calculate the bubble temperature at 1 bar. f) Calculate the dew temperature at 1 bar. g) Calculate the amount and composition of vapor and liquid when a solution with z1 = 0.45 is flashed to 40 ◦C, 0.065 bar. The saturation pressures of the two components are given by the Antoine equation: ln Pi sat...
How does Locke define the purpose of government? How does Locke define the ideal form of...
How does Locke define the purpose of government? How does Locke define the ideal form of government? Are there any weaknesses here? How do the ideas of Locke connect with those of Hobbes?
How do debt and equity securities differ? Describe how the various levels of ownership impact how...
How do debt and equity securities differ? Describe how the various levels of ownership impact how companies account for investments.
Describe how neoclassical and institutional economists approach the study of consumption. How do these approaches differ?...
Describe how neoclassical and institutional economists approach the study of consumption. How do these approaches differ? What do you think are the advantages of each approach? As your textbook notes, economists inevitably approach their studies with certain assumptions about, among other things, human nature. What kinds of assumptions about who we (humans) are and what we fundamentally desire have you seen so far in this course? Do you agree with these assumptions or disagree, and why? " Different Answers PLEASE!...
Describe how neoclassical and institutional economists approach the study of consumption. How do these approaches differ?...
Describe how neoclassical and institutional economists approach the study of consumption. How do these approaches differ? What do you think are the advantages of each approach? Economists inevitably approach their studies with certain assumptions about, among other things, human nature. What kinds of assumptions about who we (humans) are and what we fundamentally desire have you seen so far in this course? Do you agree with these assumptions or disagree, and why?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT