In: Accounting
Define ideal and normal standards. How do ideal and normal standards differ? Describe some of the criticisms of the use of standards. Lastly, write about one definition or additional concept related to standards.
Standard in simple words is a measure of what is expected to take place under the current or anticipated circumstances. Another way of defining standard is that it is something that is predetermined or planned and management wishes that actual results equate to standards.
Standards are one of important quantitative tools in the hand of management to control and measure performance of business operations. However it heavily depends on the type of standards used to decide about the control actions and to measure the performance.
Types of standards
Following are different types of standards:
Basic standards
Normal standards
Current standards
Attainable (expected) standards
Ideal (theoretical) standards
Normal Standards
These are such standards which are expected if normal circumstances prevail. Term normal represents the normal conditions of the business in the absence of any unexpected fluctuations (either favourable or unfavourable). Even through normal standards are more of a theoretical in nature as reality cannot be sufficiently predicted with all its fluctuations in advance. Also, circumstances may change in such a way that factors which were expected to be controllable are not so controllable by the mangers. Thus it has limited application in today’s business environment. However, normal standards acts as a good yardstick that represents challenging yet attainable results and can be used by management in such environment which is simple in nature and is not prone to great fluctuations.
Ideal standards / Theoretical standards.
These standards represents what business operations would be under ideal set of circumstances where everything is running at the optimum level with an ideal balance. These standards are representative of long term goals rather than for short term performance measurement. But with the advancement of technology and inventions even the ideal standards become attainable over the period of time but with every step taken forward and every question answered, more questions and more complexities pop up and its in human nature that it always extends the way forward with every milestone achieved. Therefore, ideal standards are not meant to be achieved rather to act like a guiding star.
Classification of
standards is done in the following categories based upon period of
operation, tightness & looseness:
Based on period of operations:
(1) Current
Standard.
(2) Basic
Standards.
(3) Normal
Standards.
Based on Tightness & Looseness:
(4) Ideal
Standards.
(5) Expected
or attainable standards.
Current Standards: The establishment of current standards is
done for giving specific regard to current conditions, in which use
of standards are made. The main features of current standard are:
(a) under current conditions, these standards outline what should
be the cost; (b) these standards call or make frequent revisions
& periodical review; (c) with changes in production method
& price level, these standards are required to be changed; (d)
for related period of accounting, these standards hold good. It is
easier to understand these standards which for the purpose of
managerial control have proved most useful. The use of the current
standards has two main advantages:
(i) For short periods, definite goals are provided by these
standards, which can be expected to reach easily by employees. For
the purpose of measurement of current performances, these standards
appear to be fair bases. Current standards are set at a high level
which can be attained if reasonably diligent efforts &
attention is put to the correct method of doing the job. For the
purpose of stimulating efficiency these standards may be
effective.
(ii) As expected actual performance is closely represented by
current standards, it’s economical to use the same. In the
processes of planning, budgeting & control, such attainable
standards can be used. Current standards which are not close to
expected actual performance may be applicable for the purpose of
control but for the purpose of planning & budgeting use, they
are not realistic.
Basic Standards: These are also called by different names, like
fixed standard, static standard etc. The main features of basic
standard are: (a) for an unaltered use for a long period of time,
these standards are established; (b) with same base line consistent
comparison is allowed by these standards; (c) with current
conditions these standards may not stand in harmony; (d) level of
efficiency required are not specified; (e) special class of
standards of a statistical nature are represented by these
standards; (f) basic standards are used in the same way as
commodity price indices are used by the statisticians; (g) serve as
a yardstick with which comparison of actual performance can be
done; (h) unless there is any change in the products or the
manufacturing operations or processes, these standards are not
revised. The main advantage of the basic standard is that the
number of revisions which with change in cost of materials &
labour, would be required, can be minimized.
No change other than a cost relationship computation between the
basic period & the current period is required when use of basic
standards is done. For the purpose of adjusting the standard costs
before comparison is made with the actual costs, this cost
relationship computation is used. In industries where the routines
& operations are well established & where for a long period
working conditions do not normally change, these standards can be
use. For highlighting trends these standards may be good but for
the purpose of gauging efficiency, basis cannot be formed by these
standards.
Normal Standards: Upon the past averages which are adjusted to anticipate future changes, these standards are based. For relatively longer period covering a trade cycle, the preparation of these standards is done. For the formation of these standards, allowance is given to normal fatigues & breaks, normal mistakes in production, normal waste & scrap & normal machine breakdown & maintenance. The cost performance is represented by theses standards which should normally be attained. Because of the probable errors in the prediction of the extent & duration of the cyclical effects, these standards are very likely attainable but they are very difficult to compute. A standard should not be very high so that frustration is caused but it should be high enough so that reasonably diligent effort needed for its accomplishment can be expected. For long term planning & decision making purpose, the normal standard may be good but their utility is limited in appraisal of efficiency.
Ideal Standards: Under these standards, upon perfection, attention is focused. The aim of these standards is on absolutely minimum cost which only in perfect operating conditions can be attained. No scraps, idle time, break down & rest period is provided by these standards. These standards become impossible to be attained in the long run. In practice idle standards are rarely attained & have been referred to as theoretical standards. Unfavorable variances are being revealed by the accounts as regular feature where ideal standards are used. As a result of this among the staff members depressing feeling occurs. Idle standards can be used without change or adjustment for a long time. Unless radical changes are being made in the product or in the manufacturing processes, these standards once set are rarely being changed. These standards can also be used in highly mechanized industry as engineering standards.
Expected or attainable Standards: This standard is a compromise between extremes of normal standard & extremes of idle standard. The main features of these standards are: (a) for the purpose of providing for operating inefficiencies which are unavoidable, these standards are set; (b) conditions prevailing in the period for which use of standards are made are taken into account; (c) for the purpose of evaluation of performance, these standards provide best criterion & are very realistic in nature; (d) as all requirements of good standards are fulfilled by these standards, i.e., these standards are consistent, are attainable, realistic & provide incentive for improvement; they have got the maximum usage. Level of performance expected in these standards is higher than level of performance expected in normal standard. But this level is higher enough that reasonably diligent effort for accomplishment can be expected. For cost control purpose these standards are very useful & are capable of fulfillment.