Question

In: Finance

For which of these firms would Modigliani-Miller do the best job of explaining their capital structure...

For which of these firms would Modigliani-Miller do the best job of explaining their capital structure choices?

  

A firm that only invests in very long term investments

   

A firm in financial distress

   

A firm whose choice of projects is heavily influenced by the financing options available to them

   

A firm whose shares are very inconvenient to buy or sell

Solutions

Expert Solution

A firm whose shares are very inconvenient to buy or sell

Reason :

The Modigliani-Miller theorem (M&M) states that the market value of a company is correctly calculated as the present value of its future earnings and its underlying assets, and is independent of its capital structure.

At its most basic level, the theorem argues that, with certain assumptions in place, it is irrelevant whether a company finances its growth by borrowing, by issuing stock shares, or by reinvesting its profits.

Companies have only three ways to raise money to finance their operations and fuel their growth and expansion. They can borrow money by issuing bonds or obtaining loans; they can re-invest their profits in their operations, or they can issue new stock shares to investors.

Modigliani-Miller Theorem

The Modigliani-Miller theorem argues that the option or combination of options that a company chooses has no effect on its real market value.

Merton Miller, one of the two originators of the theorem, explains the concept behind the theory with an analogy in his book, Financial Innovations and Market Volatility:

"Think of the firm as a gigantic tub of whole milk. The farmer can sell the whole milk as is. Or he can separate out the cream and sell it at a considerably higher price than the whole milk would bring. (That's the analog of a firm selling low-yield and hence high-priced debt securities.) But, of course, what the farmer would have left would be skim milk with low butterfat content and that would sell for much less than whole milk. That corresponds to the levered equity. The M and M proposition says that if there were no costs of separation (and, of course, no government dairy-support programs), the cream plus the skim milk would bring the same price as the whole milk."


Related Solutions

In the miller modigliani theories of capital structure with tax but no bankruptcy costs, how would...
In the miller modigliani theories of capital structure with tax but no bankruptcy costs, how would the WACC and cost of equity (K_e) change if the firm increases leverage?
A- Discuss the traditional theory relating to capital structure and the approach by Modigliani and Miller
A- Discuss the traditional theory relating to capital structure and the approach by Modigliani and Miller
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
Explain the Modigliani & Miller (M&M) capital structure irrelevance principle
Modigliani and miller demonstrated that "capital structure does not matter" in a perfect capital market. However,...
Modigliani and miller demonstrated that "capital structure does not matter" in a perfect capital market. However, this statement is at odds due to market imperfections. Explain how market imperfections reshape firm's choice of capital structure.
Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory...
Define the capital structure of a firm and relate to the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) theory of capital structure. Do you feel the M&M theory is correct in its findings on the capital structure of a firm? Why or why not?
The capital structure irrelevance theory proposed by Modigliani and Miller (MM) is often criticized to be...
The capital structure irrelevance theory proposed by Modigliani and Miller (MM) is often criticized to be based on very restrictive assumptions which are unrealistic in the world today. However, the theory is still considered extremely important. (word limit 400) a. Why it is important? b. Illustrate three main assumptions made by MM and discuss how the problems are tackled by alternative capital structure theories.
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in...
Modigliani and Miller (M&M) hypothesized that both dividend policy and capital structure policy are irrelevant in determining the value of a firm. Outline the arguments they used to reach their positions, including the assumptions underlying those arguments. With reference to relevant academic literature, discuss at least one reason why the M&M hypotheses might not hold in practice for BOTH dividend and capital structure policy.
Modigliani and Miller developed a theory describing a firm’s optimal capital structure, ranging from a basic...
Modigliani and Miller developed a theory describing a firm’s optimal capital structure, ranging from a basic model assuming no corporate taxes, to an intermediate model including corporate taxes, and ultimately a model providing for costs of financial distress. Do you agree or disagree that "all three models are practically applicable in the real world". Justify your comment
1. Explain Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Theory of Capital Structure under three special cases with the...
1. Explain Modigliani and Miller (M&M) Theory of Capital Structure under three special cases with the equations?
Modigliani and Miller demonstrated that capital structures policy is irrelevant. what are the basic for their...
Modigliani and Miller demonstrated that capital structures policy is irrelevant. what are the basic for their arguments. what are their proposition I and II need help please
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT